Any word if display replacement will also start applying to the rMPB? There are so many complaints on the forum with yellow screens, that it would be nice if Apple would do this...
I feel like people are so entitled these days. One part of your phone doesn't work so you want a whole new one? I suppose you walk into a dealership with a flat tire and ask for a whole new car too eh?![]()
AC+ is now being used for full phone replacements and not modular repairs. Meaning you can break your screen as many times as you want within 2 years and it will always be $79.
AC+ incidents count ONLY IF the phone in entirely replaced (i.e. the machine that attaches the new screen fails to attach it - they have to offer you a new phone).
Will they ever be able to replace the Touch ID sensor being that it is evidently paired with the A7 SOC?
Sorry if these are stupid questions, but if I have ac+ and crack my screen:
1) does this count towards my two repairs?
2) since I have ac+ and still have to pay $79 for the screen replacement, that brings the total to $179 as opposed to $150,correct?
3) if I do crack my screen can I get a replacement device to get rid of the dents etc from a drop under ac+? Instead of just a new screen?
Thanks.
Good luck with that! If there's a defect, they have to repair or replace it free of charge under consumer law in Australia, for at least two years for an iPhone.
$150 for a display replacement?LOL!
Go to any mall, look for the iPhone repair cart and fork over $50. No lines. Takes 2 minutes.
According to the findings the sensor does not work at all when paired with another A7. That was my understanding at least.
Co-worker just got an iPhone 5S (gold) today. Dead pixels. No way he'll want them to fix it. New phone please.
Meh. I prefer the AppleCare mail-in direct replacement approach.
Didn't it use to cost $49 to replace a phone with AppleCare+? Now it costs $79 just to replace a screen? How is that a better deal?
May not be a deductible if AppleCare+ covers two repairs for $79 each. What happens after the second accident? Does this mean AppleCare+ isn't worth it unless you break your screen twice.This is kind of confusing...
AC+ is now being used for full phone replacements and not modular repairs. Meaning you can break your screen as many times as you want within 2 years and it will always be $79.
AC+ incidents count ONLY IF the phone in entirely replaced (i.e. the machine that attaches the new screen fails to attach it - they have to offer you a new phone).
does this mean they are replacing the rear camera on the iPhone 5? i was just in the store last week b/c i started to get those annoying shadow spots when taking a picture with a light colored background (problem is all over the apple community forums). i am out of warranty. they said they can't replace the rear camera, but this article says they can for the 5S and the 5C.
My concern is how well an applestore employee will be able to replace some of these components and what the quality control be like. If you get your iPhone back with tool marks -- or there's a backup and it takes three hours to get it fixed I can't imagine this will be a popular change.
Apple may have just eliminated an edge they had over competitors but we'll see.
It wouldn't have happened if Jobs was still around and if Jobs was still around they wouldn't have released an unfinished OS.....and for that matter the 5C. Long time to build Apple up and a short time to break it down. It is what it is but it's a fact. Sad. I love my 5S even though it's the 5th one since Sept 20th but the day that I take it in and have a so called "genius" rip it apart instead of hand me a new one is the day that I leave.
I dont think you understand how this works. That would use one of your $79 replacements for accidental damage. Dunking your phone in water is not a warranty issue.
Lots of people seemed to be confused by the hybrid nature of AC+ which does two separate things. 1) It extends the warranty 2) it acts as insurance. 1) is unlimited replacements in the timeframe and 2) is limited to two replacements with a deductible per incident.
If you break the screen and pay the $79 that counts as a replacement. And yes you can only do that twice. If you didn't want it to count toward your apple care, you are gonna pay $129 for the glass or $240 or something for a full phone replacement. As I said in my last post, if you want a full phone replacement through AppleCare + just dunk it in water!
does this mean they are replacing the rear camera on the iPhone 5? i was just in the store last week b/c i started to get those annoying shadow spots when taking a picture with a light colored background (problem is all over the apple community forums). i am out of warranty. they said they can't replace the rear camera, but this article says they can for the 5S and the 5C.
do only select stores replace the rear camera for the 5?
Exhibit A as to why we need the "Jobs wouldn't have allowed this" filter. Thanks for proving my exact point. Unless this is satire. Either way, well done.
If you break the screen and pay the $79 that counts as a replacement. And yes you can only do that twice. If you didn't want it to count toward your apple care, you are gonna pay $129 for the glass or $240 or something for a full phone replacement. As I said in my last post, if you want a full phone replacement through AppleCare + just dunk it in water!
Wrong. Displays are $149. Full units are $269. (http://support.apple.com/kb/index?page=servicefaq&geo=United_States&product=iphone)
That may explain why the 5S 64gb, for example, costs $200 dollars more in Oz, given the current exchange rate. There's no free lunch, my friend.
I have had every iPhone since the beginning. Tried out the Moto X and loved it but came back to Apple because of customer service and AppleCare+. If Apple slacks on customer service then they are going to lose a lot of long time customers. The writing on the wall is putting apple on track with going in the same direction as Microsoft and BlackBerry. I really am starting to wonder what it's going to be like in 5 years. The Moto X has already shown that Google is more than capable of surpassing Apple if they start getting cheap. Everything has been going down hill since Apple lost Jobs. I really wonder if it's already too late for Apple to get back on track. Motorola (Google) has a HUGE opportunity RIGHT NOW. I hope that they succeed.
I don't even know where to start correcting in this post. .
But for some reason you chose to anyway....![]()
Can't just let the ignorance run rampant.
I'm not sure what factors influence their iPhone pricing here, but if you're saying the $122 markup is based on our consumer laws (which extend minimum warranty by one year for the iPhone), what you're really saying is that the iPhone has a very high failure rate between 12 and 24 months from purchase. If that's true, I don't think there's anything defensible about that! Apple has the highest markups in the industry and markets its products as superior-quality. Every customer should expect a $1000 phone to last longer than 24 months.
Mate, look at Apple's obscene profit margins, even in the US, and tell me you can talk about free lunches with a straight face!
AC+ is now being used for full phone replacements and not modular repairs. Meaning you can break your screen as many times as you want within 2 years and it will always be $79.
AC+ incidents count ONLY IF the phone in entirely replaced (i.e. the machine that attaches the new screen fails to attach it - they have to offer you a new phone).
That's not what I'm saying at all. "CONSUMER watchdog Choice has condemned Apple for forcing Australians to pay 14 per cent more for its phones than the US." Gee, now why would that be? Retail prices are set based on a lot of factors, and Australia's liberal return/exchange law is one of them. I don't think Apple just woke up one day and said "Hmm..Let's screw the Ozzies on price." If you like the fact that you have government mandated better consumer protection than the US, you shouldn't be shocked that you have to pay more for products, because it's one of the factors that determines your price.
And what exactly is "obscene" about making a better profit than competitors? No one's forcing customers to pay the "Apple tax".
It's exactly what you're saying! You're saying that Apple needs to charge more to offset the cost of extra returns. But if Apple knows its iPhones last longer than 24 months, then what's the problem?? For you to defend such a decision is to say (though you won't do it directly) that the iPhone has a high failure rate between 12 and 24 months from purchase.