I never understood how, at Microcenter, you can buy a 32 GB flash drive for $50 but can't buy a 32 Gb iPhone for $300...
I think there's other stuff inside the iPhone that the 32 GB flash drive doesn't have inside it.
I never understood how, at Microcenter, you can buy a 32 GB flash drive for $50 but can't buy a 32 Gb iPhone for $300...
That's good news.
Apple will pass the savings on to the consumers in a year or two, I'd say.
are there any chances they decrease the iphone prices soon?
such as eliminate the 8gb and drop th 16gb to 200 and add on a 32gb?
my plan ends on decemeber 7, probably wont happen then, but i wont feel good about it if they update it during the mac event thing in jan.
Given the tradeoffs between SSD and conventional hard drives, would there be reason for Apple to use both flash drives and hard drives in a single computer, with the flash memory used as an extra level in the storage hierarchy or as a RAID-type mirror device? I'm talking about the possibility that suitable hardware and software could produce improved performance, for an additional expense, by relying on the advantages of both types of storage while letting each compensate for the disadvantages of the other.
That's good news.
Apple will pass the savings on to the consumers in a year or two, I'd say.
Given the tradeoffs between SSD and conventional hard drives, would there be reason for Apple to use both flash drives and hard drives in a single computer, with the flash memory used as an extra level in the storage hierarchy or as a RAID-type mirror device? I'm talking about the possibility that suitable hardware and software could produce improved performance, for an additional expense, by relying on the advantages of both types of storage while letting each compensate for the disadvantages of the other.
Other companies actually drop their prices and alter components slightly when hardware prices do down.
Maybe with falling flash memory prices maybe Apple will finally see it fit to produce a 32 GB 4G iPod nano? I'd buy one in no time flat!![]()
I was looking at the SSD Air Book in an Apple store a few weeks ago. It's darn impressive. I would LOVE to own that, but at $2000+ for a small SSD... not likely.
Which Apple are you talking about?
Why would you feel bad about it. Just continue your current plan (out of contract) until the new cone gets released. It's not like they cut off your service or automatically renew you for two more contract years when the contract ends.
In general, SSD's differences are said to be:
- Faster random reads (since it doesn't have to move a physical drive head around)
- Slightly slower sequential reads
- Slower writes
- Lower power draw
- Less likely to "crash"
In practice, the advantages don't seem to be dramatic at this time, though I think the most recent SSD benchs have been better.
arn
Once the iPod Touch breaches 128GB of flash memory, it's goodbye to the iPod Classic![]()
Once the iPod Touch breaches 128GB of flash memory, it's goodbye to the iPod Classic![]()
Once the iPod Touch breaches 128GB of flash memory, it's goodbye to the iPod Classic![]()
It's nice to see Apple adopting SSD drives but many customers are in the creative field and stupid Adobe doesn't allow them to run their programs on SSD drives.
I just hope that one day some competition will take over Adobe's main market. Adobe is a bad company.
you are confusing SSD flash drives with SSD hard drives.
Not likely. Capacities will increase, prices won't decrease.
People, as evident by the MBA, weight is just as important as performance... Why is no one focused on weight? is there a real difference in weight one way or the other?