Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Apple to Charge Up to $1 Million for iAd Placements?

MacRumors

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster



104632-iad_icon.jpg


The Wall Street Journal reports that Apple is reportedly looking to charge up to $1 million to companies interested in participating in the company's forthcoming iAd mobile advertising platform. Those companies looking to be launch partners could be looking at sums of up to $10 million.
Apple is making waves on Madison Avenue with its price tag, which comes with initial demands for greater control over advertisers' marketing campaigns.

"It's a hefty sum," says Phuc Truong, managing director at Mobext, a mobile marketing business owned by Havas SA whose clients include Sears, Choice Hotels, Amtrak and Volvo. "What Apple is trying to do is certainly above and beyond what's been done in the past."
Click to expand...
The rumored premium pricing agrees with previous comments made by ad agencies who have received pitches from Apple's iAd team, and confirms that Apple will be targeting major corporations for participation in the program rather than smaller entities frequently seen in mobile advertising in many apps on the iPhone today.

According to the report, Apple will be charging one cent per banner displayed and two dollars per interactive ad viewed.
Apple is planning to charge advertisers a penny each time a consumer sees a banner ad, ad executives say. When a user taps on the banner and the ad pops up, Apple will charge $2. Under large ad buys, such as the $1 million package, costs would rack up to reach $1 million with the various views and taps.
Click to expand...
The report also notes that Apple itself will build the ads over the first few months in order to ensure proper functioning and aesthetics. But Apple does have plans to release a developer kit that will permit ad agencies to create their own ads down the road and submit them to Apple for approval.

While some ad directors have expressed reluctance at giving up control of ad creation during the initial stages, it hasn't stopped a reported landslide of interest from agencies, who have participated in numerous pitch sessions from Apple's iAd team around the country and have begun gearing up with ideas for their campaigns.

Article Link: Apple to Charge Up to $1 Million for iAd Placements?
 
Article Link
https://www.macrumors.com/2010/04/29/apple-to-charge-up-to-1-million-for-iad-placements/
In 1984, Apple Computer dropped $1 million for their infamous superbowl ad. Amazing that they are now charging that amount to have ads on their devices. My have the tables turned...
 
Every time everyone complains about Apple's pricing policies, and every time everyone ends up making a mint. I'm confident this will be the same.
 
lol

I'm going to click on every single interactive ad, and never buy a darn thing 😀

That will show them! Wait, who is "them?"
 
im not quite sure what to think on this one. its a totally new look at advertising and will completely disrupt google mobile and admobs advertising structure. go apple? yes, i think so..
 
This may sound like a lot of money. But they are reaching millions of people with these ads. The good thing about this, we should see only high quality ads.
 
That puts things slightly out of my advertising budget. I would hope the One million dollar campaigns would last more than a day or two. I would also hope someone actually purchases a product after clicking at least once.

Also hoping one of my competitors makes a big buy and getting ready to click lots of their adds.
 
These big fees will mean that payers will want something for their money; which will likely be more intrusive ads eventually.
 
miketcool said:
In 1984, Apple Computer dropped $1 million for their infamous superbowl ad. Amazing that they are now charging that amount to have ads on their devices. My have the tables turned...
Click to expand...

Not really comparable for a couple of reasons. Inflation means that the ad actually cost around $2m in today's dollars, and the audience for the SB was a lot smaller then than it is now. Plus iAds are a pay-[Apple]-per-view system, which is completely different from the pricing structure television commercials use.
 
So this pretty much leaves out all those (smaller) developers who were clapping when Steve introduced iAds... unless they can pony up a cool million. This seems to be targeting the larger, corporate "evil" companies. $2 bucks for a view? If I don't like a company, I'll keep on viewing their ads just to hit them with a loss.
 
Full of Win said:
These big fees will mean that payers will want something for their money; which will likely be more intrusive ads eventually.
Click to expand...

This might end up being the case -- Apple has had some patents recently related to technologies to interrupt device functioning to make sure ads are seen, etc....

I'm hoping mostly it heralds an improvement in the quality of ads. The problem for me personally as a consumer continues to be a mismatch. When I buy an issue of GQ, I spend a good amount of time looking at the ads, because they're ads for things I want. On the web, most of the ads continue to function as if they have no bloody idea what I want, or worse are perversely trying to spam me about things they are almost certain I do not want.

I personally don't see the idea of "quality ads" as sarcasm. I have no problem with advertising, and I benefit from it, as long as it is meaningful to me...
 
furi0usbee said:
This seems to be targeting the larger, corporate "evil" companies. $2 bucks for a view? If I don't like a company, I'll keep on viewing their ads just to hit them with a loss.
Click to expand...

Did you even read the article? Seriously.

MacRumors said:
The rumored premium pricing agrees with previous comments made by ad agencies who have received pitches from Apple's iAd team, and confirms that Apple will be targeting major corporations for participation in the program rather than smaller entities frequently seen in mobile advertising in many apps on the iPhone today.
Click to expand...
 
Rodimus Prime said:
Mix this with apple pretty much blocking out other ad companies is it gets pretty out of hand for pricing.
Click to expand...

Apple will not block other ad companies (Google). Developers can use anyone they want for their ads. But they are going to use who pays the best.
 
miketcool said:
In 1984, Apple Computer dropped $1 million for their infamous superbowl ad. Amazing that they are now charging that amount to have ads on their devices. My have the tables turned...
Click to expand...

Was it really infamous? Check dictionary.app.

The ad may be better described as memorable or notable, but not infamous.
 
miles01110 said:
Did you even read the article? Seriously.
Click to expand...

Um, yeah... which is why I said it's targeting large companies. My concern, as I said, is for the smaller developer not getting exposure for their products, and have to take out a huge loan, or find investors just to place ads.
 
I DO NOT WANT ADS POPPING UP ON MY PHONE.

I'm highly interested in the iPhone 4G but if it will have ads then I will be sticking with my BB.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.
Top Bottom
Back