Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
All I am saying is when I purchase a product at Apple premium prices I expect it to last.

And Apple products do last multiple years, for example my MacBook Pro from 2011 is still working that’s 7 years this year more than a reasonable amount of time, in fact I’ll be looking to see what Apple announce this year so I can upgrade at some point, the same with my 2012 iMac.

iPads and iPhones I tend to upgrade every 2 years at the latest, the 7 Plus I had and then upgraded to the iPhone X for example.
 
I’m skeptical of this report for a couple of reasons:

1. The AirPods are already resistant to water, ie sweat, which is roughly equivalent to “a splash of rain or water.” Does anyone here seriously believe that every time the AirPods get wet you have to replace them? Lol, no.

2. While I could certainly see Apple producing a new and substantially improved AirPod in a couple of years, Apple does not tend to “burn” early adopters so much these days. I suspect it will get updated about as often as the Apple Watch or the Apple TV, for precisely the same reasons: they’ve made such a substantial change that new hardware is required.

1. Early iPhones were also resistant to water before they got the official water resistant badge from Apple. No doubt apple was using the AirPods to field test their waterproofing methods. Maybe they feel confident enough to put the badge there, now, or have further improved the water resistance. :)

2. Series 0 Apple watch users would like a word with you -- the S0 watch is quite painfully slow, doesn't support swimming, and doesn't have the extensive waterproofing. It struggles to run basic apps and is slow af nowadays. I feel especially bad for anyone who got the $10k Gold Edition watches. Ouch.
 
“Hey Siri” made sense when it only existed on one or two devices. Now with 5+ Hey Siri capable devices around me, I really need a way to specify a device. Instead of general “Hey Siri”, a very simple fix would be to be able to say, “Hey Phone” or “Hey HomePod”.
Apple wants very much for Siri to work with "natural language", but there are cases where it would be REALLY helpful if Siri could expose some more structured syntax and sort of a meta language. The most frequent case for me where this would help is when Siri obstinately misspells something, no matter how you pronounce it - it'd be terrific if you could say, "Siri, you're mishearing the restaurant name, let me spell it for you" "Okay, Carl, spell it for me" "R-U-D-F-O-R-D-S" (taken from a recent case where I was on my way to meet some people across the street from "Rudford's Restaurant", and Siri kept giving me directions for an hours-long drive to some restaurant that had "Redford's" in its name; the restaurant I meant was 15 minutes away, I just wanted the fastest route considering traffic - Siri was useless, there was no way to get her to give me what I needed, because they insist on having a natural-language conversation).

(As a separate answer to your original point, Apple is working to make it so your various devices converse with each other, and use various rules about which is closest to you - measuring travel time for the sound - and which you interacted with last, to decide which single device should answer your "Hey Siri" request, but it's not entirely clear how well or how often this works, particularly if you don't have the latest devices and OS's.)
 
How would the Autoswitch work? On my bedside I have my phone and both of my iPads in close proximity. How would the AirPods know which device to connect to? Obviously they connect to the device they connected the last time. I have no choice but to go through the setup menu of the device I wish to use and connect manually. It only takes a few seconds, no big deal.

I agree auto switch might be too difficult, which is why I suggested there should be a voice command to tell the AirPods which device to connect to. I think it’s a more feasible solution and would be significantly (to me) faster/easier than manually going into control center.
 
The newest Apple product I use on a daily basis is a 2011 iMac and the oldest a 2005 Mac mini G4 both of which are user repairable.
Explain to me how the user is to repair a modern MacBook or iMac without sending it to Apple then being charged almost as much as it would be for a new Mac.

And my grandmother kept chickens in her back yard for eggs and meat and owned one stove for 50 years. Eventually she couldn't even get used parts for it and had to replace it with a modern one. Times change whether we like it or not. The era of the repairable anything is past. We live in a disposable society. I'm not loving it either but it's accept it or run for the hills. I'm not much of the camping type myself.
[doublepost=1519329832][/doublepost]
SIRI isn't smart enough to do a lot of basic stuff so adding her to airpods hands free isn't going to help.

Siri is Apple's red-headed stepchild I agree. But she gets a bad rap she doesn't deserve. With AirPods she's plenty capable of "Call X," or "lower volume," or "what time is it," ... the kind of basic things at least I ask her when wearing AirPods without issue.
 
Apple wants very much for Siri to work with "natural language", but there are cases where it would be REALLY helpful if Siri could expose some more structured syntax and sort of a meta language. The most frequent case for me where this would help is when Siri obstinately misspells something, no matter how you pronounce it - it'd be terrific if you could say, "Siri, you're mishearing the restaurant name, let me spell it for you" "Okay, Carl, spell it for me" "R-U-D-F-O-R-D-S" (taken from a recent case where I was on my way to meet some people across the street from "Rudford's Restaurant", and Siri kept giving me directions for an hours-long drive to some restaurant that had "Redford's" in its name; the restaurant I meant was 15 minutes away, I just wanted the fastest route considering traffic - Siri was useless, there was no way to get her to give me what I needed, because they insist on having a natural-language conversation).

(As a separate answer to your original point, Apple is working to make it so your various devices converse with each other, and use various rules about which is closest to you - measuring travel time for the sound - and which you interacted with last, to decide which single device should answer your "Hey Siri" request, but it's not entirely clear how well or how often this works, particularly if you don't have the latest devices and OS's.)

Yeah the tech is just not where Apple wants it to be, and who knows how long it will be before it’s there. Until this unknown day maybe years in the future, we have these slightly to majorly frustrating experiences that could easily be better now if Apple goes with a less “technologically sexy” ideal and goes with a more realistic/straightforward approach for the time being. But I understand that’s not who they are—that they want to push technology forward even if it’s uncomfortable. But at a certain point the frustration is too apparent. There is a balance, but I guess my idea of balance is different than Apple’s.
 
2. Series 0 Apple watch users would like a word with you -- the S0 watch is quite painfully slow, doesn't support swimming, and doesn't have the extensive waterproofing. It struggles to run basic apps and is slow af nowadays. I feel especially bad for anyone who got the $10k Gold Edition watches. Ouch.


I sold in my Series 0 for a 3 in Nov when BB offered me 10% off. I can't say the Series 0 was painfully slow. But I didn't really use the apps. I still don't use them because they are faster on the 3, but not instant. Some like the Delta app are still sluggish. Series 0 was fine for notifications and catching a phone call. I don't swim with my watch, so never a problem. Series 0 is certified water resistant including showers though (IPX7).
 
I agree auto switch might be too difficult, which is why I suggested there should be a voice command to tell the AirPods which device to connect to. I think it’s a more feasible solution and would be significantly (to me) faster/easier than manually going into control center.

On my old sony bluetooth headphones it would play from whatever device i hit play on
 
Great, now Hey Siri can work improperly in my ears/earbuds as well as my hand/iPhone.
 
All I am saying is when I purchase a product at Apple premium prices I expect it to last.

So let me understand this. You're unhappy with 13 years performance with a TECH DEVICE?? It's not fine furniture, where you buy quality once and it lasts decades. Tech industry is dynamic and in a continual state of flux.
 
Great. Still a "one size fits less than half the population" design that will fall out of our ears, leaving a billion dollars lying on the table from people like me who will never, ever buy them.
 
All I am saying is when I purchase a product at Apple premium prices I expect it to last.

The limiting factor in the Airpods will likely be their tiny batteries. Don’t think it’s realistic to expect the Airpods to last beyond three years (that’s how long I am giving myself), but colour me surprised if they do.
 
What I'd really like are some soft silicone tipped AirPods. That hard plastic is just too uncomfortable for me. :(

I agree 100%. My ears are not in working alignment with the air pods as-is; so I needed a solution.

Enter “rubber tips” I purchased on a amazon for about $5 for 3 pairs. They are silicon that slide over the ends of each ear piece. They work AMAZING; keep everything held tight without fear or worry of them coming out. And super comfortable as well.

Only drawback is they don’t fit back into the charging case with the rubber tips on them. Simple enough solution; I keep the charging case and a lightning cable in a little plastic zip bag. When I am not using them, or charging them, the tips stay IN the bag as well. Keeps everything together for convenience (things don’t get lost in my bag), protects the pods from weather and elements, and always know where the tips are when ready for pod use.

Easy solution and now I’m never without them.

YMMV


Best,

USVet
 
  • Like
Reactions: Foxknowsbest
Water resistance is a welcome development -- should have been part of the initial release IMHO. For everyone saying AirPods are sweat resistant, Apple does not make any claims about that. Officially, they are not certified as sweat resistant. I've been though many pairs of AirPods which Apple replaced on warranty. There is no (easy) way for Apple to determine if AirPods are water damaged so they just replace them. I'm more than 50/50 that my Pods were ruined because of my sweat.

Hey Siri is unnecessary. It's easy enough to double tap. Ironically, you still can't officially "Hey Siri" on a Mac or control HomeKit on a Mac w/ Siri.

Rather than Hey Siri, what AirPods really need is more tap commands. The reality is, when I'm running it's more comfortable to tap than have to "Hey Siri." Normally I love "Hey Siri," but not in this application. Also when in pubic I'd rather be more discrete and tapping accomplishes that better than "Hey Siri." I also wonder about battery drain. I mean isn't that why the A8 devices have to be plugged in for "hey Siri" to work?

Would also love to see AirPods be available in black or gray. Inductive charging is a given since Apple had an AirPod case on the demo AirPower.

I’ve always assumed they’re water resistant so I’ve been using them for swimming and almost every day in the shower to listen to music. I’m still using the initial pair I bought almost a year ago and they are working fine!

However, I’m not using them to workout so they are usually not exposed to a lot of sweat. Perhaps the salt causes them to stop working. This might sounds crazy but perhaps you don’t have to swap them so often if you just rinse them after your workouts ;-)
 
Last edited:
I'm still in shock these things actually sell. Uncomfortable, poor sound quality, poor design, poor fit, you name it. Ear buds used to be free with devices, now people shell out hundreds of dollars for them because they're wireless, which means you now have the privilege of charging both a phone and a headphone case?

I cringe hard when I see people walking around with two sperm shaped pieces of plastic dangling from their ears.
 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: MDePew24
I love my Airpods so this is good news to me. I'd like a black pair with wireless charging. If they could make them a bit smaller too that would be great.
 
oh goody,,!This will give users further reason to say "my hands are dirty" more, so now i can use this feature..

Convenience aside, it's only because that way after you use it, but the habits only change because they can... doesn't mean they must, even at the expense of "This is a good feature"

We did that with iPhone as well

Still good hands-free on Siri on Airpods..
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.