Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I suspect that this project was too ambitious, and that led to its apparent failure. Perhaps it would have been more fruitful if they had tried to make an LTE modem for the Apple Watch (which does not have 5G) to get the software and manufacturing pipeline in place, then upgraded their chip designs with 5G support.

But it's worth mentioning that these are rumors. Maybe the project has actually seen some success, and they're spinning down one part of the project to make room for the next one.
 
I’d guess the biggest issue, has more to do with working around IP, which by the way, Qualcomm does not own 5G, they do have a ton of IP in the standard (as do many other companies - including Apple) but they do not own it.

Not only that, but serious work has already begun on 6G IP, and Qualcomm doesn't hold these. If Apple knows this, in who's right mind would one claim they're out of the modem business ?

Maybe out of the 5G modem business, as the article's title claims, but in no way out of the modem business; that's just ridiculous.
 
Last edited:
5G was not a flop, 4G was more of a flop on promises never kept. I get over 900 mbps speeds easily, must be a you problem

Downtown louisville, 4G (LTE) I get 120mbit, 5g UC/UW, 120mbit.. same for my coworkers. I have a personal iPhone on T-Mobile and a work-issued iPhone on Verizon and speeds are similar between the two.

At home over the years. 3G, 60mbit down, LTE, 60mbit down, 5G UC, 60mbit down.

Edit: I think it's just my area. Haven't ran speed tests when I travel because I don't really care, but it's still interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It’s the right move to disconnect. Four years after buying Intel’s 5G business and patents, they have nothing to show for it. Intel had a working modem and Apple couldn’t make it happen after copying Intel’s homework and with access to 3nm.

6G is all about terahertz and satellite communications. 6G patents are being filed and test satellites are already being launched. If Apple can’t figure 5G today, they have no chance at keeping up.
 
Yeah poor Apple. They are too greedy to pay for parts from companies that actually know what they are doing.
What do you mean when you talk of a publicly-traded, for-profit company being “too greedy” that differentiates it from any other? Companies generally have an obligation to shareholders to make as much money as they possibly can.
 
Last edited:
i’m sure Qualcom is rolling when reading this article.

27” iMac
Apple Car
Apple Card
5G modem
Time Capsule
AirPort Express
MacPro (gutted)
Final Cut Pro (neglected)
Siri (from bad to unusable)

As I’ve been saying for a while:
1. Hubris born of success
2. Undisciplined pursuit of more
3. Denial of risk and peril
4. Grasping for salvation
5. Capitulation to irrelevance

Apple is still selling, and making money, but the sales are getting lower as the product quality diminishes and more and more longtime, loyal customers feel that Apple products no longer “just work.”
I see that others are jumping at your comment but I see some merit in it. The list of failed products (outright crap or, even worse, the gradual realization of failure) is long and growing. Now, whether that observation links directly to the later part of your comment is questionable but is a strong working hypothesis. If I were at Apple HQs, I would have been very mindful of the trends and looking to address these worrying signs if not ASAP but soon. The Apple compass is not pointing to the true North anymore. This is in contrast to recent advancements and adaptations of their competitors who, while not having such an intertwined universe of devices, soft and cloud services, are much more labile and eager to adapt to trends and customers' needs (instead of telling the customers what they want). Sometime I feel that Apple needs to break up into more independent entities to become a more agile company for this century.
 
Maybe not directly by Apple but Qualcomm sure could use some competition. They’re essentially a monopoly on high-end 5G modems.
I doubt Apple is giving up, they really don't want to be at the mercy of their vendors — could turn sour at any moment.

They're like looking at the following options:
  • Find a start up with a completely different hardware approach to modems (no patent infringement) and acquire them. why didn't they do this before? it's been a few years, might not have existed back then.
  • Start from scratch using a different base technology where the design is practically guaranteed to be different enough to avoid patent infringement. For example, an optical-computing based modem or something.
  • Decide if its worth trying to get certain patents invalidated to unblock their own modem. Apple has done this before, most recently with some of the sensor tech in the Apple Watch.

Good. Seems like they can't manage it and really they don't need it. They just want it to save money and not have to pay Qualcomm. Best put people to work on something else and stick with Qualcomm. 99% of users won't notice or care what modem they use.
IMHO They could use Mediatek for the Modem if they, understandably, want to reduce reliance on Qualcomm.
They could have used a mix of them, this would have given them leverage as well in negotiations.

I am not sure how things got that bad to go for such extreme measures but when you do you need to be sure that you can play the game and win it, they clearly were not and likely are not.

Mediatek would be more than happy to license the design so that Apple could include it in their SOC, see https://www.mediatek.com/technology/5g/5g-modem


What Beats me if why of why Apple felt compelled to do it in-house, These Modems require such a crazy amount of expertise that you can't simply hire a few people and expect to do it. It is order (or even orders) of magnitude more complex than what they pulled off doing the transition to Arm, and it shows, sadly.

And even if you could get something that works enough keeping up with the evolution is an insane amount of work besides the fact that if you don't have a gazillion patents on your belt then it is not even worth it anyway.



PS: No, I do not work or have any affiliation with Mediatek whilst I currently work in the industry
 
Time to dig out all the Macrumors comments

Ha yep. A couple years ago I predicted Tim Cook would look back on buying Intel’s modem business as having been one of his biggest mistakes. People downvoted it.

Rumors for years were that they basically had to scrap everything they bought anyway. Seems like it was not a very good investment now.

Don’t mistake that for thinking he made a mistake in trying to make their own 5G modems, just in trying to start from what Intel had.
 
i’m sure Qualcom is rolling when reading this article.

27” iMac
Apple Car
Apple Card
5G modem
Time Capsule
AirPort Express
MacPro (gutted)
Final Cut Pro (neglected)
Siri (from bad to unusable)

As I’ve been saying for a while:
1. Hubris born of success
2. Undisciplined pursuit of more
3. Denial of risk and peril
4. Grasping for salvation
5. Capitulation to irrelevance

Apple is still selling, and making money, but the sales are getting lower as the product quality diminishes and more and more longtime, loyal customers feel that Apple products no longer “just work.”
As long as they keep selling a zillion iPhones per year they’ll be fine, but that could change the minute they apply the same standards of care and attention to the iPhone.
 
IMHO They could use Mediatek for the Modem if they, understandably, want to reduce reliance on Qualcomm.
They could have used a mix of them, this would have given them leverage as well in negotiations.

I am not sure how things got that bad to go for such extreme measures but when you do you need to be sure that you can play the game and win it, they clearly were not and likely are not.

Mediatek would be more than happy to license the design so that Apple could include it in their SOC, see https://www.mediatek.com/technology/5g/5g-modem


What Beats me if why of why Apple felt compelled to do it in-house, These Modems require such a crazy amount of expertise that you can't simply hire a few people and expect to do it. It is order (or even orders) of magnitude more complex than what they pulled off doing the transition to Arm, and it shows, sadly.

And even if you could get something that works enough keeping up with the evolution is an insane amount of work besides the fact that if you don't have a gazillion patents on your belt then it is not even worth it anyway.



PS: No, I do not work or have any affiliation with Mediatek whilst I currently work in the industry

Mediatek modem is at least three generations behind Qualcomm based on speed alone. It has the same speed as Qualcomm X60.

Apple already played that game by using Intel. It doesn’t work because Intel couldn’t keep up.
 
As long as they keep selling a zillion iPhones per year they’ll be fine, but that could change the minute they apply the same standards of care and attention to the iPhone.
Millions of iPhone customers are also Mac customers

Smart phone sales are maturing as technology matures and people don’t see the need to upgrade as often.

It’s ridiculous to take so many products that people love, and just ignore them in favor of a single product that the public opinion on can turn on with one bad release.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.