I've edited my comment to make it obvious that I made a joke.if they can’t make a credit card work the car isn’t happening
I’m pretty sure they just hired some people from Qualcomm. Sucks to be them right now.Good. Seems like they can't manage it and really they don't need it. They just want it to save money and not have to pay Qualcomm. Best put people to work on something else and stick with Qualcomm. 99% of users won't notice or care what modem they use.
This reminds me of all that money they gave to GT Advanced to make sapphire screens for the iPhone...
and then people wonder why Apple products cost so much.Yeah poor Apple. They are too greedy to pay for parts from companies that actually know what they are doing.
Thats the strange part. Why can Qualcom do it and Apple cant? Its not magic. It just comes down to people. They can build the M series chips and blow intel away but cant make a modem? Just seems strange.
They should buy chips from Motorola or whoever Motorola used a few years back. My workgroup has a diverse set of phones that used to include Motorola. It was always kind of embarrassing to me (iPhone user) how much better the modems in the Motorola phones were. They could make calls, use data, etc. in places others could not. And this was not just a one time thing. We saw it over and over in many areas that had less than great signal. They were in another league.
Apple is discontinuing in-house modem development after several unsuccessful attempts to perfect its own custom 5G modem chip, according to unconfirmed reports coming out of Asia.
![]()
According to the operator of news aggregator account "yeux1122" on the Naver blog, supply chain sources related to Apple's 5G modem departments claim that the company's attempts to develop its own modem have failed so far, and that Apple is in the process of winding down its years-long investment in the project. Separately, the leaker known as @Tech_Reve today said they had heard similar reports from a Japanese supply chain source.
It's too early to say if the latest reports are accurate, but according to a September Wall Street Journal report, Apple's attempts to develop its own modem chip have been hampered by major issues related to unrealistic goals, an inadequate understanding of the challenges involved, and unusable prototypes.
Apple's plan to design its own in-house modem led to the hiring of thousands of engineers: Apple acquired the majority of Intel's smartphone modem business in 2019, and as it filled the project's ranks with Intel engineers and others hired from Qualcomm, company executives set a goal to have the modem chip ready for fall 2023.
Earlier this month, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reported that Apple was continuing to run into troubles in its attempt to develop a 5G modem to replace Qualcomm's 5G modems in the iPhone and other products. The modem chip launch was said to have been postponed until the end of 2025 or early 2026, but Apple was reportedly still planning to introduce the technology in a version of the low-cost iPhone SE.
Development on a modem chip was said to be in the early stages, and it "may lag behind the competition by years." One version in development does not support faster mmWave technology, and Apple has also run into issues with the Intel code that it has been working with. Rewrites have been required, and adding new features has been causing existing features to break, plus Apple has to be careful not to infringe on Qualcomm patents while developing the chip.
Despite delays, the company was thought to be continuing development because it is eager to end its expensive deal with Qualcomm. In 2017, Apple sued Qualcomm over alleged anticompetitive practices and $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates. The two companies settled the lawsuit in 2019.
Apple's first modem chip was expected to be a standalone chip, but the company hoped to eventually develop a system-on-a-chip that would also cut out suppliers like Broadcom and give it more control over component development.
Article Link: Apple to Discontinue Custom 5G Modem Development, Claim Reports
Must be your problem. In LA I can consistently get 600mbps (5g uc)Downtown louisville, 4G (LTE) I get 120mbit, 5g UC/UW, 120mbit.. same for my coworkers. I have a personal iPhone on T-Mobile and a work-issued iPhone on Verizon and speeds are similar between the two.
At home over the years. 3G, 60mbit down, LTE, 60mbit down, 5G UC, 60mbit down.
Edit: I think it's just my area. Haven't ran speed tests when I travel because I don't really care, but it's still interesting.
even if apple makes their own modems, who the heck would want a gen-1 modem on their phone? Snapdragon is on, like, its 12th versionNo chance Apple are out. Not in the least.
Overstretched resources, maybe, but they're definitely not winding that department down.
Good. Seems like they can't manage it and really they don't need it. They just want it to save money and not have to pay Qualcomm. Best put people to work on something else and stick with Qualcomm. 99% of users won't notice or care what modem they use.
So what do you think Apple is really trying to accomplish?If Apple wasn’t intending on paying or cross-licensing patents with Qualcomm, they wouldn’t have bought Intel’s modem unit. Intel’s design is all about cross licensing.
The idea that Apple was pursuing some mythical clean sheet design is romantic, but was never the case from day one. Were people seriously expecting Apple to redesign how to implement LTE, 4G, 3G, etc.?
Qualcomm do seem to have a monopoly now, which is a problem. I can't see how that monopoly could be broken if even Apple can't do it despite spending billions on it. How are Samsung getting on with their modems??Maybe not directly by Apple but Qualcomm sure could use some competition. They’re essentially a monopoly on high-end 5G modems.
You can't quite compare screens to modems, as Qualcomm have the industry bent over a barrel.My personal opinion is just let Qualcomm do it. They are the best at it and it would have been hard to beat them, knowing how much Intel struggled. I hate all this, "lets make a custom chip in house" crap. Yeah I know... everything made in house would work even better since it's going into their own products, but you can't do that for everything. It's like Apple saying they will make their own screens. Just leave that to companies that are pros at it, like Samsung.
I think you have the monopoly part backwards the rest is correct.You've totally missed the prevailing wisdom of these forums... Competition with Apple is good, competition by Apple is bad. Monopoly means Apple's 30% market share in smartphones, and 10% share in personal computers. Qualcomm has their 75% share because they're very good at what they do which doesn't count as a monopoly.
I mean, there aren’t many ways to do a modem without using existing patents….Trillion dollar company can’t do something like a simple 5g modem hmmm
So what do you think Apple is really trying to accomplish?
"please explain how Intel have always made inferior modems to that of Qualcomm", really, because Intel got lazy and management did not understand how fragile their position in the market was. They thought they owned it.But not the patents that matter because otherwise please explain how Intel have always made inferior modems to that of Qualcomm if Intel have had access to ALL of Qualcomm's modem patents due to cross license agreements. I therefore have no doubt cross license agreement did exist between the two companies but not with the patents that matter to Apple.
Why are you even here then? This, if true, is terrible news. Apple was attempting to integrate the modem into the SoC, and the power savings would have been HUGE. Moreover, they thought they could produce a better product and save money.Yeah poor Apple. They are too greedy to pay for parts from companies that actually know what they are doing.
This sentiment has basically been a quarterly copy/paste for the past 20+ years.
Exactly. I guess if they can’t do a 5G modem, there’s absolutely no hope for the Apple Car. It’s for the best really. They need to continue to focus on what has worked for years, producing Macs, iPhones and the rest. Their streaming service seems to be working well too. Let the experts like Samsung, SONY and Qualcomm do the rest to make those iPhones perform at their best.So now please focus on the Apple Car and at least finish that. 🤣
5G became mainstream quickly and improved speeds/latency, so I agree that 5G wasn't a flop.5G was not a flop, 4G was more of a flop on promises never kept. I get over 900 mbps speeds easily, must be a you problem
IMO a concerning trend with Apple.
They aren't able to expand into new technology segments anymore, they haven't been able to successfully develop a new category in almost a decade (Apple Watch).
The car is done for, modem might be cancelled as well.
The only new tech they have right now is Vision Pro.
If this turns out to be a flop, which I honestly expect it to at this point, Apple's ability to expand into new fields to counter falling demand for smartphones is questionable at best.
Maybe time to exit the stock after all and invest in different companies with more growth potential.