Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
oh how as if it was yesterday people here poking at intel for doing the same thing.
 
Good. Seems like they can't manage it and really they don't need it. They just want it to save money and not have to pay Qualcomm. Best put people to work on something else and stick with Qualcomm. 99% of users won't notice or care what modem they use.
I’m pretty sure they just hired some people from Qualcomm. Sucks to be them right now.
 
Thats the strange part. Why can Qualcom do it and Apple cant? Its not magic. It just comes down to people. They can build the M series chips and blow intel away but cant make a modem? Just seems strange.

yes. this.

im not an engineer. but nobody in this thread has been able to articulate why modem development is so difficult.

i understand the following:

1 qualcomm likely has some great people
2 qualcomm likely has recognised patents that maybe are very broad, and therefore difficult to get around

so, in a nutshell, are the reasons why apple cant succeed in a credible 5G modem just attributable to these two factors?

dont waste time commenting if you attribute any part of it to some kind of apple internal management problem. im not buying that. sorry.

is the technical knowledge needed for modems advancing so quickly that companies newer to the field haven't been able to skate to where the puck will be? whereas qualcomm is so strong that its able to continually develop newer ways that move the goal posts even further? is it a case where whatever apple's group has been able to develop that its still a generation or two behind qualcomm?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveN and alfonsog


Apple is discontinuing in-house modem development after several unsuccessful attempts to perfect its own custom 5G modem chip, according to unconfirmed reports coming out of Asia.

Apple-5G-Modem-Feature-Triad.jpg

According to the operator of news aggregator account "yeux1122" on the Naver blog, supply chain sources related to Apple's 5G modem departments claim that the company's attempts to develop its own modem have failed so far, and that Apple is in the process of winding down its years-long investment in the project. Separately, the leaker known as @Tech_Reve today said they had heard similar reports from a Japanese supply chain source.

It's too early to say if the latest reports are accurate, but according to a September Wall Street Journal report, Apple's attempts to develop its own modem chip have been hampered by major issues related to unrealistic goals, an inadequate understanding of the challenges involved, and unusable prototypes.

Apple's plan to design its own in-house modem led to the hiring of thousands of engineers: Apple acquired the majority of Intel's smartphone modem business in 2019, and as it filled the project's ranks with Intel engineers and others hired from Qualcomm, company executives set a goal to have the modem chip ready for fall 2023.

Earlier this month, Bloomberg's Mark Gurman reported that Apple was continuing to run into troubles in its attempt to develop a 5G modem to replace Qualcomm's 5G modems in the iPhone and other products. The modem chip launch was said to have been postponed until the end of 2025 or early 2026, but Apple was reportedly still planning to introduce the technology in a version of the low-cost iPhone SE.

Development on a modem chip was said to be in the early stages, and it "may lag behind the competition by years." One version in development does not support faster mmWave technology, and Apple has also run into issues with the Intel code that it has been working with. Rewrites have been required, and adding new features has been causing existing features to break, plus Apple has to be careful not to infringe on Qualcomm patents while developing the chip.

Despite delays, the company was thought to be continuing development because it is eager to end its expensive deal with Qualcomm. In 2017, Apple sued Qualcomm over alleged anticompetitive practices and $1 billion in unpaid royalty rebates. The two companies settled the lawsuit in 2019.

Apple's first modem chip was expected to be a standalone chip, but the company hoped to eventually develop a system-on-a-chip that would also cut out suppliers like Broadcom and give it more control over component development.

Article Link: Apple to Discontinue Custom 5G Modem Development, Claim Reports
They should buy chips from Motorola or whoever Motorola used a few years back. My workgroup has a diverse set of phones that used to include Motorola. It was always kind of embarrassing to me (iPhone user) how much better the modems in the Motorola phones were. They could make calls, use data, etc. in places others could not. And this was not just a one time thing. We saw it over and over in many areas that had less than great signal. They were in another league.
 
Downtown louisville, 4G (LTE) I get 120mbit, 5g UC/UW, 120mbit.. same for my coworkers. I have a personal iPhone on T-Mobile and a work-issued iPhone on Verizon and speeds are similar between the two.

At home over the years. 3G, 60mbit down, LTE, 60mbit down, 5G UC, 60mbit down.

Edit: I think it's just my area. Haven't ran speed tests when I travel because I don't really care, but it's still interesting.
Must be your problem. In LA I can consistently get 600mbps (5g uc)
 
Good. Seems like they can't manage it and really they don't need it. They just want it to save money and not have to pay Qualcomm. Best put people to work on something else and stick with Qualcomm. 99% of users won't notice or care what modem they use.

Oh, a lot of people knew it every time they got an iPhone with a "not Qualcomm" modem.
 
If Apple wasn’t intending on paying or cross-licensing patents with Qualcomm, they wouldn’t have bought Intel’s modem unit. Intel’s design is all about cross licensing.

The idea that Apple was pursuing some mythical clean sheet design is romantic, but was never the case from day one. Were people seriously expecting Apple to redesign how to implement LTE, 4G, 3G, etc.?
So what do you think Apple is really trying to accomplish?
 
My personal opinion is just let Qualcomm do it. They are the best at it and it would have been hard to beat them, knowing how much Intel struggled. I hate all this, "lets make a custom chip in house" crap. Yeah I know... everything made in house would work even better since it's going into their own products, but you can't do that for everything. It's like Apple saying they will make their own screens. Just leave that to companies that are pros at it, like Samsung.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
Maybe not directly by Apple but Qualcomm sure could use some competition. They’re essentially a monopoly on high-end 5G modems.
Qualcomm do seem to have a monopoly now, which is a problem. I can't see how that monopoly could be broken if even Apple can't do it despite spending billions on it. How are Samsung getting on with their modems??
 
My personal opinion is just let Qualcomm do it. They are the best at it and it would have been hard to beat them, knowing how much Intel struggled. I hate all this, "lets make a custom chip in house" crap. Yeah I know... everything made in house would work even better since it's going into their own products, but you can't do that for everything. It's like Apple saying they will make their own screens. Just leave that to companies that are pros at it, like Samsung.
You can't quite compare screens to modems, as Qualcomm have the industry bent over a barrel.
 
You've totally missed the prevailing wisdom of these forums... Competition with Apple is good, competition by Apple is bad. Monopoly means Apple's 30% market share in smartphones, and 10% share in personal computers. Qualcomm has their 75% share because they're very good at what they do which doesn't count as a monopoly.
I think you have the monopoly part backwards the rest is correct.
 
So what do you think Apple is really trying to accomplish?

Apple was likely trying to create a regular 5G modem that at least matches Qualcomm's n-1 product, using industry patents. I doubt they were trying to reinvent the wheel with a clean sheet design.

For whatever reason - poor leadership, lack of technical, or infighting - Apple wasn't able to meet the project requirements.

Looking at the big picture, 5G alone doesn't sell. Consumers don't choose iPhone for fast 5G. Android phones have faster 5G speeds, but so what? Cameras, security, and other software features sell. So why invest all this money and effort into developing a 5G baseband? Imagine if Apple had used this effort towards creating Siri-style ChatGPT or a folding iPhone instead. Johny Srouji's team would rather make the best chips for Vision Pro. Leadership made a painful but a correct decision to disconnect the modem project.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dabotsonline
But not the patents that matter because otherwise please explain how Intel have always made inferior modems to that of Qualcomm if Intel have had access to ALL of Qualcomm's modem patents due to cross license agreements. I therefore have no doubt cross license agreement did exist between the two companies but not with the patents that matter to Apple.
"please explain how Intel have always made inferior modems to that of Qualcomm", really, because Intel got lazy and management did not understand how fragile their position in the market was. They thought they owned it.

Oh boy, that sounds like Apple too. Hmmmm.
 
Yeah poor Apple. They are too greedy to pay for parts from companies that actually know what they are doing.
Why are you even here then? This, if true, is terrible news. Apple was attempting to integrate the modem into the SoC, and the power savings would have been HUGE. Moreover, they thought they could produce a better product and save money.

Yes, greed too. Greed is good, it’s what pushes companies to make newer, better products.
 
So now please focus on the Apple Car and at least finish that. 🤣
Exactly. I guess if they can’t do a 5G modem, there’s absolutely no hope for the Apple Car. It’s for the best really. They need to continue to focus on what has worked for years, producing Macs, iPhones and the rest. Their streaming service seems to be working well too. Let the experts like Samsung, SONY and Qualcomm do the rest to make those iPhones perform at their best.
 
Last edited:
IMO a concerning trend with Apple.

They aren't able to expand into new technology segments anymore, they haven't been able to successfully develop a new category in almost a decade (Apple Watch).

The car is done for, modem might be cancelled as well.

The only new tech they have right now is Vision Pro.

If this turns out to be a flop, which I honestly expect it to at this point, Apple's ability to expand into new fields to counter falling demand for smartphones is questionable at best.

Maybe time to exit the stock after all and invest in different companies with more growth potential.
 
5G was not a flop, 4G was more of a flop on promises never kept. I get over 900 mbps speeds easily, must be a you problem
5G became mainstream quickly and improved speeds/latency, so I agree that 5G wasn't a flop.

However, 5G had very little impact on how people use devices, it didn't expand the current possibilities at all.

Remember all the 5G hype articles about how it will change automotive, live events, allow for remote surgery etc? Literally nothing happened. Your cat pictures now take 0.3 to send instead of 0.6 seconds.
 
IMO a concerning trend with Apple.

They aren't able to expand into new technology segments anymore, they haven't been able to successfully develop a new category in almost a decade (Apple Watch).

The car is done for, modem might be cancelled as well.

The only new tech they have right now is Vision Pro.

If this turns out to be a flop, which I honestly expect it to at this point, Apple's ability to expand into new fields to counter falling demand for smartphones is questionable at best.

Maybe time to exit the stock after all and invest in different companies with more growth potential.

Apple... Doomed again. Because they'll need to purchase modem chips from Qualcomm. Like they've been doing in the past.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.