The iPod classic is dead in Europe anyway. I bought every iPod until the EU volume cap came along, and now the devices simply don't produce enough volume to be usable. I won't buy another one.
It's one thing stopping me from damaging my hearing (which I am capable of looking after myself, thanks), but when I can't hear quiet passages in classical music on full volume while walking up a street with traffic, there's something wrong.
In fact any music which wasn't mastered particularly well can be almost inaudible. So that's most of my late sixties and early seventies collection then.
The older iPods have plenty of power available in those situations, and pandering to the EU cap rather than adding some kind of compression has ruined a once great device.
The iPod touch does not suffer the EU cap, and is presumably classed as a different type of device and thus exempt. This is, to coin a phrase, beaurocracy gone mad!
Is all this right? Can someone confirm please? It sounds just astounding! In which case I will buy my iPods from overseas from here on in
Not a Windows user. The application is awful on the Mac. You must not actually use it.
That's not much use to those of us who play a lot of music away from home. My classic is playing music from 8:00am until 5:00pm everyday while I'm at work.
I'd blast through my entire monthly data allowance on the morning of the first day of the month if I was streaming. I'll stick with my classic thanks.
Both of my daughters (aged 4 and 6) have shuffles. They're ideal, not only for working out, but for those with little but less well co-ordinated fingers.Not a big deal.
Nano>Shuffle
If this rumor turns out to be true Apple will have to change the iPod icon in iOS.
![]()
I'm happy with iPod touch, but if still there are people that like iPod classic then i see no reason to axe it.
It is not in Apple's interest to force people to make more use of iCloud than necessary. iCloud serves to make Apple's products more attractive, not the other way around. Apple sell things, not services.Apart from if it really did loose money, which the chart doesn't show, then why would you need to stop it? ... Oh yes iCloud. Lower the storage capacity of the devices so people will use the cloud services more... clever
We are in the post iPod era. It is a thing of the past.
Because iPods are SO crappy, right?![]()
Go ahead and axe shuffle.
iPod nano should not be in 149 dollars range. Bring it down to price it as 49-99 dollars. I see somewhere between 49-99 dollars as a good price range for the iPod nano. We all want something light and portable for running.
iPod nano has a market for this.
Ipod Classic should live for another year or two. I doubt Apple will release 128GB iPod touch this year.
Shuffle costs 49 dollars but iPod nano is what shuffle is now with the screen.
No one wants shuffle. kill it. Drop the price on nano. It costs like 38 dollars for apple to make nano and they want 149 dollars price for this.
Bring it down to 99 dollars.
Marcush1286 said:Screw Apple! They shouldn't have discontinued the ipod. Apple is no longer a company I have any respect for ANYMORE. They have gone too far.. I hope it does crumble under Tim Cooks Totalitarian command.
With Jobs gone(almost), the company might have problems.. as I don't trust Apple anymore. I am about to toss my Apple stuff in the trash.