Indeed, the OS is worth some of the premium, and I love the look of the unibody. The question is, is it worth the extra £££ you pay? I guess to some people it is, others no...
Are you suggesting that being self-serving when buying products is bad?....and as long as it is to some people, the market exists for exactly what Apple is doing, and few, if any, other PC makers are.
With that being the case, how can any call for Apple to change not be viewed as obviously self-serving, to the detriment of those who like what Apple does and want them to continue to be able to do it?
The latest round of PC ads is a two edged sword, I think. While they do show that by comparison the prices on PCs are significantly lower, it also raises the question, "Why are they lower?" .
Yet this remains MS's style of blatant deception. BTW, do you recall seeing the 1st gen 30G Zune being advertised in the paper, side by side with not the 30G, but the 80G iPod, as if to state that the Zune was comparably a better deal since it cost $249 instead of $299?they also raise the question "do they think the public are idiots". this last ad was just sad. the store employee sounded like an idiot and this so called filmmaker was a joke line. even if she was a student, I can't see any film school that wouldn't be pushing final cut on the students as it is one of the small handful of programs that actual studios use. and Final Cut is Mac only. AVID is the other big program and it runs on both. plus the macbook pro was under $2000 since they never consider tax in those ads, had a faster processor, only a half an inch less in a screen, movie editing and dvd mapping software as well as scoring options suitable for a hobbyist film maker, and so on. in many ways it is the better machine and fit the bill on the price as anyone listening heard. and if she is an actual student there's a discount with Apple making it more like $1700
Are you suggesting that being self-serving when buying products is bad?
Do you think Apple is being altruistic in their pricing model?
Well...with the recession and all, I think it would be wise if Apple introduce an affordable Mac. Perhaps something like the eMac, but not limited to the educational market and with a 17" flat-screen all-in-one like the iMac.
I've often wondered what the phrase "hardware and software integration" meant from the mac users. I have a hackintosh with all the features of a mac (and some they dont have), and it runs perfectly. What makes the mac hardware so much more special, other than perception?
Why have you had to do this?+1 Hardware and software integration and all that premium hardware talk just means that people have been fooled or don't know what they are talking about. Most macs are just last year's pc in a nice coat. Only reason I'll be buying a mac is that I don't have to download some illegal cd and tweak it to run with all my components.
BMW has a higher failure rate than Toyota, but BMW customers are more satisfied. Customer satisfaction is a very broad term that could mean anything. For example, they could be so thrilled with OS X that even though the machine breaks, they still give a higher satisfaction rating than if they had used a Windows PC that didn't break. Customer satisfaction ratings are very far from an ideal measure of hardware build quality.
Why have you had to do this?
What does that have to do with your previous statement?I didn't *have* to do anything. I just wanted to use Lightroom. It runs on Windows and Mac. I used Windows, but got annoyed with it, so I decided to try out OS X and I liked it. So I'll be getting a Mac, despite the somewhat disappointing hardware.
I have used Vista before on a core 2 duo, 2GB ram machine (DDR2), it runs slower than my p4 computer with XP(DDR1). Vista froze when we are working on an important project, when we are checking email with my friends, and load slightly slower than my XP counterpart.I have an iMac and an HP quad-core that I've been using for the last year and a half... My HP kicks the iMac ass in every possible thing I can compare with...
For example: I was very frustrated that on Friday, I tried to write an email for get sponsors for my jog-a-thon. I opened up Safafi on my iMac since the iMac seems to use less power than my PC because I have tons of stuff on my PC. After using Gmail to write the email, the damn thing froze! I couldn't send or even edit the email. I then went to use yahoo mail thinking that since gmail is in beta, it'd have that problem. SAME RESULT!!! I went to my HP and retype the email and send it. Then go back and send it again and again and again since I needed lots of sponsor. No problem on my PC AT ALL. AND YES! I'M USING WINDOWS VISTA with NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER!
So with the frustration I've gotten from my iMac over the period that I own it compared to the problems I get with my PCs, I only kept the iMac because it was FREE. Otherwise, it would have gone back to the store the week I got it.
Here's my list of problems with the iMac...
1. It comes out of sleep EVERY TIME it loses connection with my bluetooth mouse.
2. I have to re-pair my bluetooth mouse EVERY TIME I shut down the system.
3. Using Safari is a bitch! I can't copy and paste as easily as PC. I have to be extremely precise in choosing the EXACT CENTER of a form in order to do any pasting.
4. It automatically download craps onto my computer. On a PC, when something wants to download anything onto my computer, I get a warning that says this program wants to download or run something... But NO, I saw in my download folder a whole bunch of crap that it automatically downloaded... AND THEY'RE VIRUS FILES!!! Good thing I didn't let it run!
5. Safari is NOT safe to use on the Internet at all! Automatically downloading virus files in executable form in UNACCEPTABLE!
6. OSX has NO defense against viruses. Don't tell me your crap that it needs no virus protection because it DOES! Wait until people start developing viruses for OSX and you'll come crying to MS for their well protected OS.
For those of you who keep saying that Vista is this and Vista is that... Have you even remotely tried using Vista? I have NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER using Vista... and I've been using Windows since Windows 3.1... Sure... windows 95 has a few bugs and that was fixed. Windows 98 had bugs that were fixed. Windows ME has bugs too and they were fixed... Same with Windows NT, Windows XP and Windows Vista. I LOVE Windows 7 so far. Not a single problem except for device drivers since it's just a release candidate and no driver has been develop for my hardware yet. But that's not a problem... I still have Win Vista which has all the drivers I need.
Does OSX have bugs? YES! That's why it's been released to developers and testers all this time. APPLE just release their OS when THEY think there's no bugs left... But from my experience... It's still buggy as hell. That's why there's updates... just like MS. MS's OS only has bugs on release because MS rushes Vista out to the public. They clean up, however. Apple isn't free from whatever you dreamers think. It's time to wake up and stop worshipping your false idol Apple... It's only a FRUIT people! It won't grant you any prayers... Maybe it keeps the doctor away as they say, "An apple a day keeps the doctor away." I like to see my doctor, thank you very much!
Which model iMac do you have? A freezing issue could be related to a graphics card problem - a firmware update may eliminate this problem. I have an iMac 3.06, which continuously runs over nine intensive apps simultaneously, without experiencing a hiccup. Running nine intensive apps on Vista does not garner anything close to the same results.For example: I was very frustrated that on Friday, I tried to write an email for get sponsors for my jog-a-thon. I opened up Safafi on my iMac since the iMac seems to use less power than my PC because I have tons of stuff on my PC. After using Gmail to write the email, the damn thing froze! I couldn't send or even edit the email. I then went to use yahoo mail thinking that since gmail is in beta, it'd have that problem. SAME RESULT!!! I went to my HP and retype the email and send it. Then go back and send it again and again and again since I needed lots of sponsor. No problem on my PC AT ALL. AND YES! I'M USING WINDOWS VISTA with NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER!
Which bluetooth mouse are you using? Sounds like a signal problem from the mouse itself.Here's my list of problems with the iMac...
1. It comes out of sleep EVERY TIME it loses connection with my bluetooth mouse.
Ditto.2. I have to re-pair my bluetooth mouse EVERY TIME I shut down the system.
However, dragging and dropping objects and URLs directly from web pages is a breeze, compared to Windows. Dragging URL addresses directly onto the Safari icon in the Dock opens it without typing. Copy cmd tab Paste is a breeze, with most URL forms, and autofill works with most of them as well.3. Using Safari is a bitch! I can't copy and paste as easily as PC. I have to be extremely precise in choosing the EXACT CENTER of a form in order to do any pasting.
This is simply not true - OS X will never download anything without permission. If you saw items in your download folder, they were very likely components of a previous download.4. It automatically download craps onto my computer. On a PC, when something wants to download anything onto my computer, I get a warning that says this program wants to download or run something... But NO, I saw in my download folder a whole bunch of crap that it automatically downloaded... AND THEY'RE VIRUS FILES!!! Good thing I didn't let it run!
Ditto with Safari5. Safari is NOT safe to use on the Internet at all! Automatically downloading virus files in executable form in UNACCEPTABLE!
Unix has been around for 35 years, with security as its foundation. The reason Macs are “safer” is because OS X is based on BSD Unix. Unix was designed to deal with mutiple users. The numours security issues encountered in dealing with multiple users have been mitigated by design, over the years, for the secure system we have today. Windows, on the other hand, was originally a single-user system with mutliple-users bolted on as an extra feature back in the Windows 95 days. Security was then bolted on top of that for Windows Xp. Even more security was bolted on the top for Vista and Vista 2 (Windows 7). The difference here is, that OS X is designed with security as a foundation. Window has it grafted on the top. Guess which is more secure…?6. OSX has NO defense against viruses. Don't tell me your crap that it needs no virus protection because it DOES! Wait until people start developing viruses for OSX and you'll come crying to MS for their well protected OS.
True, Vista runs quite smoothly when executing tasks of minimum intensity i.e. emailing, surfing, typing documents. This is not the case, however, while running several memory intensive applications at once, or while dealing with large files. OS X is far more reliable, efficient, and powerful when it comes to productivity at this level, as releases of OS X tend to be far more refined, with far fewer bugs, than any releases of Windows.For those of you who keep saying that Vista is this and Vista is that... Have you even remotely tried using Vista? I have NO PROBLEM WHATSOEVER using Vista... and I've been using Windows since Windows 3.1... Sure... windows 95 has a few bugs and that was fixed. Windows 98 had bugs that were fixed. Windows ME has bugs too and they were fixed... Same with Windows NT, Windows XP and Windows Vista. I LOVE Windows 7 so far. Not a single problem except for device drivers since it's just a release candidate and no driver has been develop for my hardware yet. But that's not a problem... I still have Win Vista which has all the drivers I need.
4. It automatically download craps onto my computer. On a PC, when something wants to download anything onto my computer, I get a warning that says this program wants to download or run something... But NO, I saw in my download folder a whole bunch of crap that it automatically downloaded...
AND THEY'RE VIRUS FILES!!! Good thing I didn't let it run!
Windows, on the other hand, was originally a single-user system with mutliple-users bolted on as an extra feature back in the Windows 95 days. Security was then bolted on top of that for Windows Xp. Even more security was bolted on the top for Vista and Vista 2 (Windows 7).
Indeed, the OS is worth some of the premium, and I love the look of the unibody. The question is, is it worth the extra £££ you pay? I guess to some people it is, others no...
Let's be serious, when has Apple pricing *ever* been affected by outside forces?