Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Makes Sense. If Apple wasn't planning less expensive Macs, why would they make Snow Leopard at all?

A more efficient, sleeker operating system is not exactly necessary for high-end computers, which gain more and more CPU power, RAM and HDD space with every new model.

It would still be nice to have a faster OS :)
 
Re: Apple to Introduce Cheaper Macs?

It would be very easy for Apple to cut the price of both Mac Mini models and the lowest price MacBook by $100-150 each without giving away the store.
That would boost immediate sales of "entry-level" Macs and set up future purchases of more expensive models down the road.
 
If Apple were bothered why did they put the price of the Mac Mini up during a recession?

Q-are they selling any?

Apple sales seem to be down, I would guess that the mini is suffering more than MacBooks.

In this recession, they will not be able to count on Mac users to upgrade as often as they might once have. So they are going to need to convert Microsoft users to Mac and this segment is under pressure from fewer potential consumers (private and professional) willing to spend less money.
 
Makes Sense. If Apple wasn't planning less expensive Macs, why would they make Snow Leopard at all?

It remains to be seen whether Snow Leopard will fulfill everything Apple has promised for it.

I could see Apple cutting prices a bit. That would likely result in a noticeable increase in sales, and clearly Macs have been overpriced for what you get for a while now. But then again, Apple may not want to give the impression that they're being hurt by Microsoft's ad campaign.
 
steve jobs is rolling in his grave right now.
Steve Jobs is ROFL right now.

Q-are they selling any?

Apple sales seem to be down, I would guess that the mini is suffering more than MacBooks.

In this recession, they will not be able to count on Mac users to upgrade as often as they might once have. So they are going to need to convert Microsoft users to Mac and this segment is under pressure from fewer potential consumers (private and professional) willing to spend less money.

On the other hand, a price adjustment for the Minis and iMacs would seem appropriate as well as welcome
 
Something no one really mentions...

is that the resale value of any product with an Apple logo on it is vastly superior to any other similar product from different vendors!

I always buy my Mac's used/referbished and within 1 year old, add Applecare if needed and use it until my heart is content to buy another. I then sell it for nearly what I paid for it! I've done this with nearly each product in my signature.

This means I only needed to spend a few hundred bucks to upgrade every few years. This is something most PC users do not get.

I compare it to my 99 Hyundai that I bought brand new for 20k and today it's 1k and my used 04 BMW that I paid 27k for and could easily sell it for 20k anytime I want!

Lower prices... raise prices... doesn't matter because I(we) will still make out in the end.
 
Apple needs a $999 iMac, a $499 Mac mini and an $899 MacBook. Whether that's introducing lower-end models or price cuts doesn't really matter.
These price points are somewhat more palatable.

http://macmall.com

$947 iMac's
$479 MacMini's
$929 MacBook's

Sure, many of those are last generation, but they are new and carry a full warranty.
Someone paying Apple's retail prices isn't trying very hard to find a better deal. Those are prices on current hardware.
 
Still WAY TOO MUCH!

Dropping the price to $1,150 "puts a considerable dent into the cost of owning or switching to a Mac"? You're kidding me, right? That's still twice as much as it would cost to buy a more powerful PC. Absurd. Apple needs to start allowing 3rd parties access to its hardware configurations, then maybe we will see some real price point drops.
 
Want it to happen but it wont. And even if it does ... by the time the reduction, say $150 has gone through Apple's magic currency converter ... 10€ is neither here nor there.:(:mad:
 
Get 'em in cheap!

It would be very easy for Apple to cut the price of both Mac Mini models and the lowest price MacBook by $100-150 each without giving away the store.
That would boost immediate sales of "entry-level" Macs and set up future purchases of more expensive models down the road.

This is assuming people are going to like what they see. I know I bailed on Macs the minute I turned the power on. The OS works well for a phone, though.
 
If Apple wants move to the next level, they have to lower their prices. Perhaps, they have convinced 10 to 15% of Americans and 5-10% of the world to have a Mac, but if they keep the same prices they will never dominate the computer market. They'll keep doing well, but slowly. Furthermore, linux and Apple had a chance to break Microsoft during the Vista period. It is going to be a lot more difficult for some people to go mac when they can have Windows 7, which is very good, by the way.
Microsoft had a chance to break themselves with vista and they did. they just had their first quarterly loss in something like 20 years.
 
Well, admittedly, I read that piece on AppleInsider.

That being said, I've said basically the same thing for years! I've been trying to get my mom to switch (maybe if I tell her about Parallels she'll start considering it... heh heh heh).

The main problem: Price. If Apple were to have their prices more in line with comparable Windows machines (like the ads from Micro$oft have been trying to say), then things would be a lot better looking for Apple (and for my mother getting a <5 yr old computer without forcing me to do too much tech support).

BJ
 


AppleInsider reports that Apple is preparing to introduce cheaper Macs as soon as this spring. The move reportedly comes in response to consumer buying patterns shifting toward cheaper computers, including those in the netbook category.The report presumes that the pricing changes would appear in the consumer MacBook and iMac lines, although exact details on models and price points remain unknown.AppleInsider claims that the MacBook could see price reductions as part of a minor revision to Apple's notebook lines in the near future.

Article Link: Apple to Introduce Cheaper Macs?

Silly talk. Apple is a premium product. Premium products demand premium pricing. There's no such thing, nor will there ever be, a "cheaper" Mac. When it comes to Apple, you will always get what you pay for, and you pay for and get a premium computer product.

What's next? $300 Rolexes and $12,000 BMWs? Not likely.
 
I love how naive we are...

MacBook versus MacBook Air...the air has LESS but costs more.

MacBook versus MacBook Touch... the touch will have LESS but cost more.

It's just not in Apple's DNA to put out an inexpensive product. Never have, never will. Look at their brand identity...
 
Hold on, hold on everyone...

Can you not see that it makes sense? Doesn't a netbook present the ultimate in portability?

Look at this setup...30inch Cinema Display (or pick your size) at home attached to the netbook by the cable with a couple external eSATA hard drives driven from the Express 34 card in your netbook.

When you are ready to go out and about, just disconnect, through the netbook in your proverbial wallet and away you go with Mac in hand.

The new netbooks will have the connections for this type of ultimate hybrid desktop/mobile setup.

Likely, this will all cost less than your average macbook with similar peripherals.

Can you not see it?
Good but I would like a good CPU, RAM, and GPU. :)
 
Kewl, I can't w8 for a reduce in cost and a little upgrade :) to the current MacBooks.

I'm coming to the USA in less than a month and I wanna have a MacBook!!! I'll work my a$$ of for a MB or MBP this summer. I wanna replace my Hackintosh...
 
If Apple wants move to the next level, they have to lower their prices. Perhaps, they have convinced 10 to 15% of Americans and 5-10% of the world to have a Mac, but if they keep the same prices they will never dominate the computer market. They'll keep doing well, but slowly.
Maybe domination was never the plan. Maybe making more money every year was the plan.
Furthermore, linux and Apple had a chance to break Microsoft during the Vista period.
Not a chance. The same was said with virtually every new Windows release over the last 20 years, all of which had problems. Microsoft will continue to dominate if only by inertia. Apple offers consumers a choice, not a New World Order.
 
I think you want too much. Millions of people outside the United States would love to buy macs at the US price.
 
Microsoft had a chance to break themselves with vista and they did. they just had their first quarterly loss in something like 20 years.
Might this be also referred to as shooting one's self in one's own foot?
 
I really hope Apple don't cut their prices because I would hate to see the UK Mac prices get even higher. ;)

Yes, I know it's because of our worthless currency!
 
I prefer to have kinda 2 speed in Apple:
a) Lower price and lower quality-specs
b)Same price as now and same quality-specs.

I think most of mac users (me included) turned away from windows cause we got sik of it's probs-instability-and fomatting at least once a year.

I got an iMac 24" as a beginning and after a month I sold all my PC's and got me a macbook pro. I enjoy them a lot cause thei quality is superb and they work fine everyday-all day!

So...I hope apple will keep going with quality and no pc's for the masses :)
 
The word "cheaper" is not a good word to use.
How about "less expensive"?

Regardless, consumer perception is:

cheaper = lower quality
less expensive = good or same quality but lower price.

making somethng less expensive forces a company to make things cheaper
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.