I know what a straw man is, I was just pointing out that you like to defend apples position, hence the condoning. Nothing to do with a stawman argument.
That makes much more sense. You phrased it very differently to begin with. I defend them because I agree with them (on most things) and really seriously do not believe they are trying to screw people. You might; that's fine. But if you insinuate that I am actively defending their intent to screw people, that's where we get into the logical fallacies.