Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Great, I guess this is the new
Btw: I own an iPad and find it truly useless for anything than games. I can't multitask with it (switching apps is not multitasking) and there is no real workflow possible. I find it troubling that the CEO of Apple uses his iPad 90% of the time, as me and most people I know work much faster than an iPad can allow, even for basic task, more advanced task is not possible on an iPad at all...

You're doing it wrong.
 
Wow, this is the silliest thing I've read on the internet all day, and I was reading the comments section of some yahoo sports articles. Nice job.

iSee a fanboy, posting around like regular people. They don't know they're fanboys.
 
Seems to me that this would kill the 64 GB model. If you're the kind of person who would need 64 GB and are willing to spend $699, it seems like a no-brainer to add $100 to get another 64 GB. I wonder which memory size hits the margin sweet spot.

Well the 64 Gb model never killed off the 32 Gb model. So I doubt that the 128 Gb would kill the 64Gb.
Some people will only want 64 Gb. For them that is plenty. Power users (personal or business) will probably go for the 128 Gb because it will suit their needs.
 
But why so early February 5?:confused:
Companies tend to do strange moves when they don't know what to do. This 128GB iPad, released with such a hurry, clearly looks a silly reaction to the stock roller coaster.

----------

Really cant see that happening. Not with iOS at least.
Fasten your seatbelt. Yes, iOS won't replace laptops in the real world, but however, the iOS product line is likely to replace the Mac product line on Apple, mainly because people tend to use computers less for work and more for entertainment. It's clear that we, people who use computers for work, won't be using Apple stuff 10 years from now.
 
Companies tend to do strange moves when they don't know what to do. This 128GB iPad, released with such a hurry, clearly looks a silly reaction to the stock roller coaster.

You don't seriously imagine that Apple has developed this new SKU and organized the whole supply-chain for the roll-out in couple of weeks, do you?

:rolleyes:
 
The pricing is consistent and to be expected, but I hope that improving memory costs will allow a price reduction across all the iPad models at the next update.

This is about time. 16gb iPad is still a great deal. 32gb less so, and so fourth.

$800 for 128 GB is horrible -- it's almost double the price of the ipad itsself, only to get more (albeit much more) flash storage.
 
I would love to see these price points for the iPad 5 and iPad mini 2:

iPad 5
32GB - $399
64GB - $499
128GB - $599

iPad mini 2 retina
32GB - $329
64GB - $429
128GB - $529

(16GB iPad mini non-retina @ $229)

Maybe I'm dreaming for 2013, but eventually...

Soon I hope.
 
Why more expensive?

Moore's Law and also price per gigabyte has dropped by 50% in the last 12 months should mean the 128GB should be cheaper than the 64GB retina model when it launched.

16GB iPad is pretty useless even for a none power user. 8GB iPod is similar too.

At this point the 128GB should take the price point of the 64GB. The 64GB should replace the 32GB, and the 32GB should replace the 16GB. They should drop the 16GB completely.
 
Honestly this makes me a little excited and not directly because of this upgrade itself. It means there is a potential for the iPhone/iPod Touch to FINALLY see some capacity updates from this 4 year streak of charging the same price for the 64GB capacity.

Flash prices have crashed since 2009, to be honest the line should see a price drop with 128GB taking the place of the 64GB pricing and 32GB being the entry point.

Its funny, part of the reason Apple has developed such a market was because they were ahead in capacities against the competition. At some point that changed and now the competitors offer more space through microSD slots. Really wish Apple would go back to competing on a capacity level..even if they don't add external ports.
 
Apple needs to make the price breaks more in line with cost of components.

16GB - $499
32GB - $549 (+50)
64GB - $624 (+75)
128GB - $724 (+100)

or

32GB - $499
64GB - $599
128GB - $699
 
At this point the 128GB should take the price point of the 64GB. The 64GB should replace the 32GB, and the 32GB should replace the 16GB. They should drop the 16GB completely.

I think they will with the iPad 5 - it'll seem like a "price drop" and it'll also be something else to differentiate it from the mini (especially if the mini gets retina).
 
Ten bucks says prices drop across the board for storage capacities in the next generation. They'll drop 16 gb and make 32 gb the entry level at $500.

this:D


i definitely will be selling my iPad 3 if this happens

especially since the iPad 5 is going to be as light as the iPad Mini
 
Price gouging

Apple need to realise that not everyone who purchases its products does so out of fashion trends or fads.

Given the iPod Touch was launched many years ago with 64G, it would seem sensible that 128G would cost the same as 64G given the collapse in flash memory prices.

I'm sick of Apple price gouging and getting the market wrong, not to mention its production issues with new slim 'fat' iMac.

Given the limitations of iOS and the iPad, I'll be getting a ASUS tablet next once they upgrade the Infinity with hopefully a 128G storage option.

I love Apple products but presently they are overpriced toys - time to concentrate on the computer side of the business and not fads.:eek:
 
I dreamed a dream dream.

This is progress but I really want a terabyte iPad. I want everything with me all the time. What is happening to me? 16GB, 32GB even 128GB is just not enough anymore. We need better storage technology and fast.
 
This is progress but I really want a terabyte iPad. I want everything with me all the time. What is happening to me? 16GB, 32GB even 128GB is just not enough anymore. We need better storage technology and fast.


Terabyte flash they showed at CES was like very expensive ......

That'll happen .... :eek:

Apple would then be advertising as "never need to backup again" ... A totally un-cool Apple. :cool:

It will probably happen, just not anytime soon.
 
that'll neverrrr happen.

mainly because people will buy the iPad regardless of price. I don't know if they chose that pricing scheme if it would entice THAT much more customers.

Yeah the $50 difference won't happen...just because many more people would upgrade to the larger capacity versions, which would cause problems with keeping stock of all the models.

But I think dropping the 16 for 32 will happen at some point. They dropped the 8GB iPod Touch and now start at 16GB. As the iPad gets more features and more uses they will want the baseline to be higher so that apps can become more complex.
 
Funny, local paper "announced" an "iPad 5 with 128GB" for almost £800 (UK) ...

Wonder where they got their information from.
 
From 16GB to 32GB = 16GB --> 100$
From 32GB to 64GB = 32GB --> 100$
From 64GB to 128GB = 64GB --> 100$

Now i am thinking 100$ for 16GB more is a little bit overpriced :eek:

Apple should ditch the 16GB model, which is useless, and start with the 32GB for the price of the 16GB and so on up to 64GB. It's been over 3 years now, memory keeps dropping in price. the 128GB model should take the place of the 64GB model.
 
Apple should ditch the 16GB model, which is useless, and start with the 32GB for the price of the 16GB and so on up to 64GB. It's been over 3 years now, memory keeps dropping in price. the 128GB model should take the place of the 64GB model.

doesn't match Apple's MO
 
Apple should ditch the 16GB model, which is useless, and start with the 32GB for the price of the 16GB and so on up to 64GB. It's been over 3 years now, memory keeps dropping in price. the 128GB model should take the place of the 64GB model.

I'm perfectly happy with my 16GB iPad mini
 
Apple need to realise that not everyone who purchases its products does so out of fashion trends or fads.

Given the iPod Touch was launched many years ago with 64G, it would seem sensible that 128G would cost the same as 64G given the collapse in flash memory prices.

I'm sick of Apple price gouging and getting the market wrong, not to mention its production issues with new slim 'fat' iMac.

Given the limitations of iOS and the iPad, I'll be getting a ASUS tablet next once they upgrade the Infinity with hopefully a 128G storage option.

I love Apple products but presently they are overpriced toys - time to concentrate on the computer side of the business and not fads.:eek:


Limitations of iOS? i dont know what you're talking about, Objective-C is so powerful you can pretty much accomplish anything you want, besides flash crap, which isnt imperative in business.



the iOS is THE operating system for businesses wanting to use mobile devices.
you know how crappy eclipse is compared to Xcode? and of course all the different sized devices that use different resolutions

when u compare the iOS and Android OS, its like comparing a rolls royce to a camry.


yes the individual device can be better than the iPad, but the OS isn't, managing of devices for businesses isn't, and just look factor of having an iPad, wether you're in retail, manufacturing, etc etc. it looks better for your customer and it impresses them giving them a good impression.


lol toys? these devices have far more worth in the business "computer side" than the entertainment side.

these are hardly toys, these devices are going to effect every working industry and the iOS is Windows to businesses as Android is to Everything else "Mac OS, Unix, Linux" etc etc etc
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.