Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
QUICK!

Where can I get a 64-bit kext for my old ATI X1600? I want to install this on my 2006 MacBook Pro!!!

You and me are in the same boat here. As much as I am not a fan of apples direction lately, The fact that my perfectly fine (and still quite snappy) 2006 macbook pro won't get the new OS (when I know it would run just fine on it) is starting to make me consider moving away from apple again. The whole obsoleting hardware via software thing makes more sense on the iPhone, because it's still relatively new and the hardware performance is scaling fast every year. In this case, adding the new features does push the boundaries of relatively young hardware. But in the computer world, processors have been pretty fast (arguably fast enough) for most users once Dual Core processors started becoming the norm. The performance is still scaling, but much slower than it used to. My 2006 macbook pro still runs great and does everything I want my mac to do, I don't want to be forced into upgrading the hardware just because apple decided to not write some video drivers. Seriously... It's one thing to do this with phones, but when I spend $2000+ on a laptop, I expect to be able to run new OS's on it until the hardware literally can't handle it. I am also not so much a fan of the faster OS release cycle.
 
Didn't the 2006 MacBook Pros only have 32-Bit Core Duo CPUs? I know that later 2006 iMac models were upgraded to 64-Bit Core 2 Duo processors, but I don't recall if there were also re-configured MacBook Pros in that year - it's too long ago. If you only have a machine with a 32-Bit Core Duo processor, you can't install ML on that machine anyway.

If I were you, I'd probably put Windows 8 or a Linux flavor on that machine instead of wasting my time on an unreliable Mountain Lion hack.

They released Core 2 Duo versions in late 2006, I have the 17" version of it.
 
Down Vote

Where did the down vote option go?

To see that a post is unpopular you now need to look over all pages of the thread to kind of determine what the average upvote is and see if a certain post falls below that. Plus, real stupid posts might get people to log in and cast a vote but now they cant so it still doesn't reflect on the post..

Strange change.
 
It is always amazing how people post questions anywhere pretending they can't google. (or lazy comes to mind)
Amazing? Yes. Surprising? Sadly, no.

Then again, I've been on the World Wide Web since 1993. There's a lot more mindless behavior on the Internet than thoughtful reflection and careful research.

The typical person doesn't seem to care if he/she comes off like a blathering idiot. Go visit Yahoo Answers. One of the most amazing displays of typical Internet behavior.
 
Where did the down vote option go?

To see that a post is unpopular you now need to look over all pages of the thread to kind of determine what the average upvote is and see if a certain post falls below that. Plus, real stupid posts might get people to log in and cast a vote but now they cant so it still doesn't reflect on the post..

Strange change.

Yeah, interesting... maybe it's just a glitch.
 
I've always been slow to adopt apples newest os and os updates. Only retarded or new os x users adopt early updates. But I will never upgrade to mountain lion. I don't need sand boxing or fewer features or iOS like options. Screw apple.

Why do people uprank this trash?
 
I've always been slow to adopt apples newest os and os updates. Only retarded or new os x users adopt early updates. But I will never upgrade to mountain lion. I don't need sand boxing or fewer features or iOS like options. Screw apple.

if you have this big of a problem with apple then why do you have a Mac?
 
It's happened a few times in which a model is refreshed but has no announcement or keynote. Just looking at last year alone - the early 2011 Macbook Pros, 2011 iMac, 2011 Macbook Airs, and 2011 Mac Mini - all received their 2011 hardware bumps without much fanfare outside of the Apple Store website being updated.


Forget last year, this year apple is doing things differently. U mention MacBook pros as a first example. This year we had a keynote that focused on the updates. With that alone I'm going to say significant updates to iMac range that will start off the next keynote.
 
The fact that my perfectly fine (and still quite snappy) 2006 macbook pro won't get the new OS (when I know it would run just fine on it) is starting to make me consider moving away from apple again. [....] processors have been pretty fast (arguably fast enough) for most users once Dual Core processors started becoming the norm. The performance is still scaling, but much slower than it used to. My 2006 macbook pro still runs great and does everything I want my mac to do, I don't want to be forced into upgrading the hardware just because apple decided to not write some video drivers.
I have a 2006 C2D iMac, which also won't take Mountain Lion. To be honest, it is getting a bit slow for the tasks I do -- but you're right that it will still do most things reasonably well, like surfing, watching videos, typing up email or Word docs. It even runs Creative Suite, at a push.
So ... why the need for 10.8? Your hardware will keep running Lion as long as the hardware holds together. No one is forcing you to upgrade.

As for whether "you know" that your Mac will cope with ML -- well, who knows? It may be that there is a valid technical reason relating to the graphics cards in those machines. As far as I know, Apple hasn't actually explained the rationale for their decision: it is sites like this that have drawn their own conclusions.
 
I really do hope there's a better release than the current GM. There's loads of problems with it on both my late 2011 MBP, and my 2011 iMac. Both fresh installs as well.

Mostly graphics, some stability issues too.

It's not as snappy as Lion either :confused:
 
CDN - content distribution network

I'm running the GM so I'll probably wait until a week or two after ML is officially launched to get OSX 10.8.0... no point in waiting for an 8 hour download when it could take just 30 minutes a week later.

I can't wait, but I know that I wouldn't be able to get it the day it comes out because Apple's servers would be pounded, and it would take 8 hours to download.

Apple uses Akamai, so most people will download a copy from a cache server at a nearby ISP. Few people will get it from any Apple-owned server. (And even fewer if Apple is able to push copies out to the cache servers before release.)

The order processing servers may get hammered, though.
 
Last edited:
Lion was released on a Wednesday as well. Wednesday the 20th. I figured it'll probably be the 25th, the day after the Q3 conference if they repeat what they did last year.
Not quite. Last year they didn't have something called "The Olympic Games". They have this year and it starts 27-7-2012..2 days later which means that they get 2 days at the utmost of exposure for Mountain Lion because after that the entire world is aimed at the Olympics. If you want everybody to adopt ML and therefore also dropped its price then it is less likely that it'll be released on 25-7-2012. 19 or 20-7-2012 is more likely in this scenario. On the other hand...most people will buy it anyway, price is very low. The rumour isn't as strong as it was last year.
 
damn less then 2 weeks ago i finally upgrade from snow leopard to lion on my mid 2007 black macbook, I figuered it wouldn't be supported in ML however Iam now really hooked on messages beta, Iam hoping apple doesn't close messages beta for lion users or better yet maybe they will add it as a feature later on, but I doubt it. btw this old black macbook seems to run lion faster then some newer macs as it has a intel ssd in it.
 
I've always been slow to adopt apples newest os and os updates. Only retarded or new os x users adopt early updates. But I will never upgrade to mountain lion. I don't need sand boxing or fewer features or iOS like options. Screw apple.

Those that don't evolve with the rest of the world get left behind.

So, what option are you eventually going to take? Moving to Windows 8? Good luck! In a few years you're going to have to switch back to reading hardcopy books and newspapers, and sending letters via snail-mail since nothing will run on your old hardware.
 
Those that don't evolve with the rest of the world get left behind.

So, what option are you eventually going to take? Moving to Windows 8? Good luck! In a few years you're going to have to switch back to reading hardcopy books and newspapers, and sending letters via snail-mail since nothing will run on your old hardware.

I still use 10.4 and 10.5 daily.
 
Do you have any tests to back up that statement? The few people I've talked to about it say it's about the same in performance.

---

Please Apple, please release Logic X soon. Logic is unreliable on Lion, and from what I've heard the performance is not up-to-par on Mountain Lion. It's pretty ridiculous that Apple's professional software is not tuned to work with their latest operating systems.

Benchmarks are about the same but the interface feels much much faster on ML. Not sure if there are ways to quantify that.

Logic has been fine for me on both Lion and ML so far. Seems like maybe Logic is more finicky on the newer OS, seems like some people have problems while others are fine.


Apple has a major design flaw in Gatekeeper - you CANNOT leave it turned on and simply add exception for that one application that does not run when Gatekeeper is turned on. It's either all or nothing.

But that's not a problem, if you need an exception just right click the app to open it the first time.

there's no big difference between SL, Lion and ML in responsiveness.

Not the case here, Lion is much less responsive than SL on the same hardware.
 
I've always been slow to adopt apples newest os and os updates. Only retarded or new os x users adopt early updates. But I will never upgrade to mountain lion. I don't need sand boxing or fewer features or iOS like options. Screw apple.

I'm retarded and proud, computer-redneck. :D

I tried the "golden master" version of Mountain Lion. It's actually better than I expected, and I expected it to be slightly better than Lion. The Notification Center is such a great replacement for Growl, which has broken at this point for me. Messages is just iChat but slightly better. The Dock looks way better.
 
The order processing servers may get hammered, though.

Would dev downloads of the ML beta have gone through this? Will dev downloads of the release version of ML go through this, too? (My understanding is that devs get the release versions for free... IDK, I only signed up for the Mac dev program in January of this year.)
 
Not the case here, Lion is much less responsive than SL on the same hardware.

Not on my hardware which is two different machines from 2008 and 2009. Although SL is much less responsive than Leopard in this hardware.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.