Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Now I dont have to use one of my friends dev accounts. Nothing to be scared about all I have never had that big of an issue with any of the beta’s. My phone has always worked except a few games now and then.
 
Good! This has been needed for a very long time. Apple cannot expect a limited test of the product to fish out all the bugs.
 
If I'll be able to downgrade both my devices through iTunes if necessary then sign me up! I'll do the same thing that I did with Yosemite: install on my 2nd device until the kinks are ironed out (iPad) then once I find its stable enough I'll install in on my primary device (iPhone).

Sign me up! I don't mind beta software and can handle it.
 
Why?

It's not like the public beta program is improving quality in iOS. Every release is slower and buggier and less secure than the last. Also Apple is clearly not responding to customer feedback on usability and design.

All the beta program does is force developers to have to rewrite their apps for yet another API/SDK unecessary change and ensure they will only have to release 5 app patches in the first week after an iOS update instead of 10.

Lastly, 98% of the people getting these beta's are people wanting to run the newest version of iOS so they can appear cool to their peers and have absolutely no intention to contribute to feedback or bug reports, which is why the program is an absolute failure IMHO.
 
[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]


Following up on the public beta program used for OS X Yosemite that allowed non-developers to try out and offer feedback on the operating system before its release, Apple will be launching similar programs for iOS 8.3 next month and iOS 9 later this year, reports 9to5Mac.iOS 8.2 is still in developer testing as Apple gears up for an April launch of the Apple Watch, but the company has also begun seeding iOS 8.3 to developers. The update includes a number of tweaks including support for wireless CarPlay, two-step verification on Google accounts, a new emoji picker, and Apple Pay through China UnionPay.

After a dramatic visual overhaul with iOS 7 in 2013 and a number of new features such as Continuity in iOS 8 last year, iOS 9 will reportedly focus on stability and optimization, although some new features are likely to be included.

Article Link: Apple to Launch Public Beta Testing Programs for iOS 8.3 and iOS 9
Yeah! this makes sense, because the Yosemite Public Beta worked to iron out the bugs before the full release, didn't it. :rolleyes:
 
It's definitely the major issue with public beta programs, some use them to get access to the latest and shiniest features, but either don't understand or don't want to understand that it's beta, may not work as intended, that it may even brick their device in the worst cases.

And the feedback, in my experience, isn't all that useful - it generates a ton of noise to filter through and manage for the QAs.

But hey, public betas are gold for PR and tech sites.

Well, it depends what they release as a Beta though. If they release something akin to IOS 8 (which probably was at a public beta level of completeness....) well, they won't get more crud than releasing this same OS to 100M device in 4 months would :). Doing so though means they'd have to have a feature freeze on IOS 9 quite earlier then in the last few years.
 
And even if MacRumors designates forums for beta testers there will still be people who insist on posting in every thread that "it's a beta" and that somehow discussing bugs is "complaining." Can't wait.

That's not what people mean when they say others are "complaining." It's the people who come on the forums and rail about how unstable a "release" of iOS is, when they're running a developer build, or who incessantly complain about features not working on those same developer builds. The problem with that is two fold:

First, you should not be running developer builds on your daily driver, and even if you do you should take the inherent instability and glitches as part of the territory.

Second, as part of the developer program you agree to an NDA. You're not supposed to be disclosing details of the release in public forums, but should be discussing them in the Apple developer forums.
 
Last edited:
Further proof that Apple is stretched so thin that they don't have the chops to squash bugs like they used to. Either that or their competence in software engineering is going dowwwwwwwn hill. Usually .0 releases are the public betas.

Very very odd. Let the customers help us figure it out while we let Wall Street control our company.

Yeah...
And Microsoft must be VERY stretched thin since they announced their public beta of Windows 10 a few months back.
So sad to see all these companies competence in software engineering go dowwwwwwwwn hill at the exact same time.
Very very odd. You know, unless you are being ridiculous & this is a standard & useful way to ramp wildly popular software.
 
Great news. I said this would happen, back when they announced it for OSX last year, wonder where all the people that were adamant this wouldn't happen now.

It's good, as it means more feedback potentially. The program does advise not to put betas on primary devices, so in the end, it's down to the user. If they choose to ignore it, they only have themselves to blame.
 
Perhaps you're confused... this is a forum. It's a place where people with similar interests communicate. So, sometimes people do that, and it's, well, perfectly acceptable.

Yes, and sometime people do the other thing and dissagree with people who don't understand that when they test a beta software, they will be facing bugs which take time to be ironed, and if dealing with bugs frustrates and makes them sick, then they probably should quit testing and stick with the official public releases.

So yeah, sometimes people do that too and it's perfectly acceptable.
 
I must admit, I never thought they'd do this for iOS, but I'm glad to hear it!

I unfortunately don't have time to test unreliable beta software anymore (though I always enjoyed it), but it makes me excited to think about the bugs that will get ironed out before the official release. Especially the little ones like the menu bar sticking to the top of the photos app, or iPads getting suck in one orientation, or UI lag on new devices.

I am part of the public beta for OSX and will look forward to being part of it for iOS. Don't really have the time either, but was happy to be in front and playing with the latest release. The reality is that the public beta release is usually after several dev betas, so I do not expect serious issues.

For example for Maverick, the major issues I found and reported was applications that did not work properly. Most were small things that were address by the app vendor or Apple before the official release.
 
I am part of the public beta for OSX and will look forward to being part of it for iOS. Don't really have the time either, but was happy to be in front and playing with the latest release. The reality is that the public beta release is usually after several dev betas, so I do not expect serious issues.

For example for Maverick, the major issues I found and reported was applications that did not work properly. Most were small things that were address by the app vendor or Apple before the official release.

The issue for me is that I was able to install Yosemite on a separate partition.

I can't afford to have my iPhone be unreliable at all because I must stay in communication. I take my iPad to school and use it thought the day for notes and storage. I can't afford for that to crash either.

If I could partition iOS devices I would, but it's an all or nothing approach.
 
You just know people are gonna do this with their primary or only iPhone, have all kinds of bugs and apps not working, and then the Apple Store employees are gonna have to deal with it.



I have that concern as well. An everyday user will sign up for the beta not completely grasping what they're getting into and then will get mad at Apple for "crappy software," which could potentially hurt their reputation.

I suppose they can try to avoid this by forcing to user to acknowledge (multiple times) that this is test software that will contain issues, but some/many people just tap "okay".

Perhaps they could require the install via iTunes, that would weed out many non-techy people since many of them probably just use OTA updates.


This will be done the same way as the Yosemite Beta was done last year. It will be via sign up only. Limited number of applicants. When you sign up, there's warnings and disclaimers. It states that Apple Store Employees will not be able to assist. The successful applicants will have to download the IPSW and install via iTunes for the first public beta. It will not be a free for all, offered over OTA. Just like the developer betas. Beta 2 onwards will be OTA to those running Beta 1. Additionally, Public Beta will be when the Developers are on Beta 3 or 4.

So really, it's not going to be the nightmare you expect.

You realize that 'the public' is going to be going around installing this. The public generally doesn't know what is going on until they have that little update badge the morning GM is released.



This is targeted at the 'enthusiast' crowd who can handle betas.


Exactly this. Well 95% will be this. The remaining 5% will be the ones that think they can, but screw it up. Which is the same as before, when people did it 'unofficially'.

----------

And the "it's for developers. Are you a developer?" entitlement nonsense.


That's what I hate about this forum in the summertime. They're just trying to be obtuse. They contribute nothing useful and want to either cause aggro or appear superior.

----------

Calling the AppleSeed program "public" is inaccurate. True it's beta s/w tested by non-devs, but it's an invitation only program unlike last year's OS X public beta which was open to anyone who signed up before a stated time.


Last years Public Beta was via AppleSeed for signup and distribution.
 
It's 95% of the way there

Wifi, DNS and DiscoveryD issues plague it

Just look at Apples own discussion forums, the Wifi thread is 2600+ posts

OSX Yosemite Wifi issues

While I agree that some have this issue; not everyone had it. My girlfriend and her bff have no issue at all on their Yosemite devices.

Also, 2600+ posts when tens of millions of users have a sofware is not conclusive proof that this is pervasive. Seeing as it has been so hard to solve the issue, I'd argue that this is probably a rarer bug than people think. They do have to reproduce these issues, and their various circumstances to actually solve them.

I think the changes they made for continuity is what has messed the network stack for some.
 
Aaaaaaaand commence all high schoolers installing iOS 9 on their phones when it's simply not ready yet. Then they all throw their iPhones off a bridge, say that they've "Gone Galaxy" and are "never going back to iPhone" and then, when iOS 9 comes out, everyone is too scared to upgrade and then adoption is slow and Apple is doomed and then oh wait they're making a car?

----------

But in all seriousness, I ain't about that beta life no mo. It's overrated.

Children. Not everyone is like that. I have 8.3 installed on my primary phone and it is working great; I looked at potential bug reports before doing it and the risk didn't seem that high. I think it is all about researching and understanding potential issues before diving in. For instance on beta 4 of 8.2 there was a Facebook app issue; since I think Facebook and its app are utter garbage, I decided I was fine with that bug.

Also I would give my left foot to have a reliable 3rd party keyboard API... It is much improved on for 8.2 and 8.3 imo.
 
Apple is clearly not responding to customer feedback on usability and design.

Got any facts to back that up? Or are you projecting your opinion as fact? Majorities are what counts. If there's something you don't like, odds are, you're in a minority, thus nothing gets done.




All the beta program does is force developers to have to rewrite their apps for yet another API/SDK unecessary change and ensure they will only have to release 5 app patches in the first week after an iOS update instead of 10.

Unnecessary change?! I'm starting to think you're either trolling, being obtuse or just do not understand the point of software updates, bug fixes and the reason for betas.





Lastly, 98% of the people getting these beta's are people wanting to run the newest version of iOS so they can appear cool to their peers and have absolutely no intention to contribute to feedback or bug reports, which is why the program is an absolute failure IMHO.


You contradict yourself by giving a fact, then end the post stating its your opinion. It can't be both. I personally know about 30 people that run betas and provide feedback. I know 10 others who develop and also provide feedback. None try to appear cool. Have you got any evidence to back up that the program is a failure? Or is that more opinion falsely presented as fact.
 
This is a step in the right direction, yet like anything else it's not without its drawbacks. Depending on how it's managed, it could prolong shipping a final version by months.

However by implementing a very long delay before finally giving the public a large screen iPhone, Apple created a massive backup of buyers who waited years, then set record sales numbers making Apple look good. Only Apple has that kind of control over their user base.
 
When people go camping or hiking and get bit by mosquitos, they will probably complain about the mosquitos. Because they are annoying. It doesn't mean they shouldn't go outside, and it doesn't mean they weren't aware that there would be mosquitos. It just means that sometimes bugs are annoying and as a communicative species, we like to talk to share experiences in conversation.

I'm pretty sure whether it comes to running betas, or camping/hiking, nobody EXPECTS it to be bug free. It would be naive to think people expect otherwise.

Not disagreeing at all! But like the Yosemite public beta showed, a lot of people were cursing Apple for releasing something with bugs, saying it broke their laptop, etc. how can Apple do this, blah blah blah... Those are the people that shouldn't be downloading the betas...

Discussing and pointing out the bugs is the whole point of the betas, so that's a very good thing!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.