Yeah! this makes sense, because the Yosemite Public Beta worked to iron out the bugs before the full release, didn't it.[url=http://cdn.macrumors.com/im/macrumorsthreadlogodarkd.png]Image[/url]
Following up on the public beta program used for OS X Yosemite that allowed non-developers to try out and offer feedback on the operating system before its release, Apple will be launching similar programs for iOS 8.3 next month and iOS 9 later this year, reports 9to5Mac.iOS 8.2 is still in developer testing as Apple gears up for an April launch of the Apple Watch, but the company has also begun seeding iOS 8.3 to developers. The update includes a number of tweaks including support for wireless CarPlay, two-step verification on Google accounts, a new emoji picker, and Apple Pay through China UnionPay.
After a dramatic visual overhaul with iOS 7 in 2013 and a number of new features such as Continuity in iOS 8 last year, iOS 9 will reportedly focus on stability and optimization, although some new features are likely to be included.
Article Link: Apple to Launch Public Beta Testing Programs for iOS 8.3 and iOS 9
It's definitely the major issue with public beta programs, some use them to get access to the latest and shiniest features, but either don't understand or don't want to understand that it's beta, may not work as intended, that it may even brick their device in the worst cases.
And the feedback, in my experience, isn't all that useful - it generates a ton of noise to filter through and manage for the QAs.
But hey, public betas are gold for PR and tech sites.
And even if MacRumors designates forums for beta testers there will still be people who insist on posting in every thread that "it's a beta" and that somehow discussing bugs is "complaining." Can't wait.
Further proof that Apple is stretched so thin that they don't have the chops to squash bugs like they used to. Either that or their competence in software engineering is going dowwwwwwwn hill. Usually .0 releases are the public betas.
Very very odd. Let the customers help us figure it out while we let Wall Street control our company.
Perhaps you're confused... this is a forum. It's a place where people with similar interests communicate. So, sometimes people do that, and it's, well, perfectly acceptable.
I must admit, I never thought they'd do this for iOS, but I'm glad to hear it!
I unfortunately don't have time to test unreliable beta software anymore (though I always enjoyed it), but it makes me excited to think about the bugs that will get ironed out before the official release. Especially the little ones like the menu bar sticking to the top of the photos app, or iPads getting suck in one orientation, or UI lag on new devices.
I am part of the public beta for OSX and will look forward to being part of it for iOS. Don't really have the time either, but was happy to be in front and playing with the latest release. The reality is that the public beta release is usually after several dev betas, so I do not expect serious issues.
For example for Maverick, the major issues I found and reported was applications that did not work properly. Most were small things that were address by the app vendor or Apple before the official release.
Yosemite is great.
You just know people are gonna do this with their primary or only iPhone, have all kinds of bugs and apps not working, and then the Apple Store employees are gonna have to deal with it.
I have that concern as well. An everyday user will sign up for the beta not completely grasping what they're getting into and then will get mad at Apple for "crappy software," which could potentially hurt their reputation.
I suppose they can try to avoid this by forcing to user to acknowledge (multiple times) that this is test software that will contain issues, but some/many people just tap "okay".
Perhaps they could require the install via iTunes, that would weed out many non-techy people since many of them probably just use OTA updates.
You realize that 'the public' is going to be going around installing this. The public generally doesn't know what is going on until they have that little update badge the morning GM is released.
This is targeted at the 'enthusiast' crowd who can handle betas.
And the "it's for developers. Are you a developer?" entitlement nonsense.
Calling the AppleSeed program "public" is inaccurate. True it's beta s/w tested by non-devs, but it's an invitation only program unlike last year's OS X public beta which was open to anyone who signed up before a stated time.
It's 95% of the way there
Wifi, DNS and DiscoveryD issues plague it
Just look at Apples own discussion forums, the Wifi thread is 2600+ posts
OSX Yosemite Wifi issues
Aaaaaaaand commence all high schoolers installing iOS 9 on their phones when it's simply not ready yet. Then they all throw their iPhones off a bridge, say that they've "Gone Galaxy" and are "never going back to iPhone" and then, when iOS 9 comes out, everyone is too scared to upgrade and then adoption is slow and Apple is doomed and then oh wait they're making a car?
----------
But in all seriousness, I ain't about that beta life no mo. It's overrated.
Apple is clearly not responding to customer feedback on usability and design.
All the beta program does is force developers to have to rewrite their apps for yet another API/SDK unecessary change and ensure they will only have to release 5 app patches in the first week after an iOS update instead of 10.
Lastly, 98% of the people getting these beta's are people wanting to run the newest version of iOS so they can appear cool to their peers and have absolutely no intention to contribute to feedback or bug reports, which is why the program is an absolute failure IMHO.
When people go camping or hiking and get bit by mosquitos, they will probably complain about the mosquitos. Because they are annoying. It doesn't mean they shouldn't go outside, and it doesn't mean they weren't aware that there would be mosquitos. It just means that sometimes bugs are annoying and as a communicative species, we like to talk to share experiences in conversation.
I'm pretty sure whether it comes to running betas, or camping/hiking, nobody EXPECTS it to be bug free. It would be naive to think people expect otherwise.
But how will people know I'm better than them if they can get the beta too?
![]()