Certainly not. I am mostly happy with my Apple devices. The DMA will make them even better.It seems the those in favor of the dma mistakenly think it means (dismantle apple).
Certainly not. I am mostly happy with my Apple devices. The DMA will make them even better.It seems the those in favor of the dma mistakenly think it means (dismantle apple).
Overall they won’t, imo, but we will all see in a fair amount of time.Certainly not. I am mostly happy with my Apple devices. The DMA will make them even better.
Already made them worse. And will continue to do so.Certainly not. I am mostly happy with my Apple devices. The DMA will make them even better.
That's pure speculation. But even if it was the case. It's Apple's fault if they don't know how to prioritize their resources. They can just postpone some new thing like mirroring or the silly tinting features, which nobody really asked for.Bugs were not fixed and new features were not implemented because engineering resources had to be diverted to support all of these requirements. It didn’t just happen magically, significant engineering resources were used to do that. Also introduced more complexity and technical debt into the iOS codebase. So by definition, iOS is worse because of the DMA.
The EU forced Apple to write code to support these features. Not sure why that’s so hard for you to understand.
This is code that will be used in different jurisdictions as well. It's just a matter of time.Are you seriously claiming that the EU has not required Apple to make changes to support third-party app stores? The changes they've made to support third-party app stores would beg to differ.1
A rational person would also find it ridiculous to compare smartphones to game consoles. There are good reasons why iOS and Android are subject to the new rules. Everyone is using them, and you need them to organize your daily life.You said that your argument is that "not allowing 3rd party stores anti-competitive regardless of the circumstance." If you believe that, then every platform no matter how big or small should have to support third party stores. Any rational person would find that ridiculous.
Anything more complicated than "Don't lockdown the phones you make."?Are you seriously claiming that the EU has not required Apple to make changes to support third-party app stores? The changes they've made to support third-party app stores would beg to differ.
Well, hot dog, that's exactly my point.Seems like plain language to me. I see an obvious difference between doing something and not doing something.
That was me clarifying what the common position is regarding what counts as anri-competitive. My reason for supporting a ban on lockdowns is user freedom.You said that your argument is that "not allowing 3rd party stores anti-competitive regardless of the circumstance."
Yeah. And?If you believe that, then every platform no matter how big or small should have to support third party stores.
Okay? I'm not sure what your point is in the context of the discussion.This is code that will be used in different jurisdictions as well. It's just a matter of time.
Again, what does that have to do with the conversation I was having? The person that I was responding to said no platform should be able prevent third party stores on their platform. I disagree. It appears you do to.A rational person would also find it ridiculous to compare smartphones to game consoles. There are good reasons why iOS and Android are subject to the new rules. Everyone is using them, and you need them to organize your daily life.
Yes.Anything more complicated than "Don't lockdown the phones you make."?
Yep. I just think no reasonable person could agree with you.That was me clarifying what the common position is regarding what counts as anri-competitive. My reason for supporting a ban on lockdowns is user freedom.
Maybe put a little thought into all the platforms that exist and how ridiculous it would be to expect all of them to add support for third party stores.Yeah. And?
They can just postpone some new thing like mirroring or the silly tinting features, which nobody really asked for.
Tinting maybe 😉.Actually, I would say, that much more customers, even in EU, is asking for mirroring or the silly tinting features, than for 3rd party app stores. I for one, would much prefer mirroring, than 3rd party app stores, so it isn't nobody anymore![]()
Mac OS desktop EU marketshare is 16%.Tinting maybe 😉.
But to use mirroring you would need a Mac. I'm pretty confident, that the overwhelming majority of iPhone users does not even own one.
I suspect many people are overrating the short-term benefits (third party app stores) while underrating the possible long-term ramifications of the DMA (disincentivising Apple from offering the integrated platform that they are so renowned for within the EU).Certainly not. I am mostly happy with my Apple devices. The DMA will make them even better.
But to use mirroring you would need a Mac. I'm pretty confident, that the overwhelming majority of iPhone users does not even own one.
Mac OS desktop EU marketshare is 16%.
Mobile OS EU marketshare is 31.5%.
So just over half of the iPhone users probably have a Mac... hardly "overwhelming majority" as stated.
It's not my case I own almost all Apple devices, but maybe we would have to do a census to see the penetration it has in the market that Apple users at least have two different devices!Tinting maybe 😉.
But to use mirroring you would need a Mac. I'm pretty confident, that the overwhelming majority of iPhone users does not even own one.
US iPhone owners are a higher percent I believe than EU.I'm not sure if percentages are similar in the EU but according to U.S. CIRP data from 2021, around 37% of iPhone owners own a Mac.
![]()
iPhone users drawn to iPad but not Mac or Apple's home devices, study finds | AppleInsider
With a sticky software and services ecosystem, iPhone has proven to be an effective gateway device to other Apple products, but that pull has its limits, a new study shows.appleinsider.com
US iPhone owners are a higher percent I believe than EU.
overwhelming is a vague termIf 37% is still accurate and U.S. iPhone owners are even a higher percentage of Mac owners than EU, that would make the other poster's comment about "the overwhelming majority of iPhone users does not even own one [a Mac]" fairly accurate.
No. I'm saying that device manufacturers should not be allowed to lockdown the devices they make. That is not "forcing a platform to support third-party stores".So you're argument is that I should be able to force any platform to support third-party stores? Holy crap! I can't imagine any rational argument to support that.
What about operating system developers locking down the OS they make?I'm saying that device manufacturers should not be allowed to lockdown the devices they make
I would disagree. I see no reason game consoles should not also be forced to open up and allow normal software installation.A rational person would also find it ridiculous to compare smartphones to game consoles. There are good reasons why iOS and Android are subject to the new rules. Everyone is using them, and you need them to organize your daily life.
I care less about that since software that features signature checks can be patched.What about operating system developers locking down the OS they make?
Please re-read my comment. it’s still true.Basically everyone does, in many countries around the world.
you're just arbitrarily drawing the line.A rational person would also find it ridiculous to compare smartphones to game consoles. There are good reasons why iOS and Android are subject to the new rules. Everyone is using them, and you need them to organize your daily life.