Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Yeah, that's not how software has ever worked. Have fun contacting a developer of software you bought 20 years ago and asking them for a Sierra or Windows 10 version of their software for free because you paid for it two decades ago. All software has a limited support window, and that's just the way it is.
Never mind the possibility that the company has been acquired or become defunct through other means, and the software couldn’t be supported even if they wanted to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tnesmith
Yet you cared enough to post a smart aleck response. LOL

Not smart aleck at all. Sadly, it's the way things are here. What I care about is that situation. But I immediately lose respect for people and have no use for their views who find it necessary to sink to using hackneyed juvenile remarks.
 
Never mind the possibility that the company has been acquired or become defunct through other means, and the software couldn’t be supported even if they wanted to.
Yeah, that's the biggest problem people are going to have ... deprecated software that has no possibility of being updated.
 
Mac:

Cons - Very little backward compatibility, works with pretty much Apple-only stuff, third party software needs to stay current. Can be expensive and some features get left behind.

This is different. It's not "we reworked the network library and it's so much more efficient and developers need to use the new API". It's not "We locked down how we handle memory so programs can no longer fiddle with the memory in other apps" (I had a few apps like QuicKeys that never really recovered from that change.) The reason for breaking old software was for a major improvement for the user in terms of performance or security.

This 32/64 bit is for the convenience of Apple.

Oh, and the argument that people are making of "These are the reasons you should be using Windows" - that's NOT a good argument for Apple.
 
Does this means the Appshopper app finally gets a new version? If it's gone anyway they might give it another shot.
 
Nice straw man. What I said totally can be translated as "I don't like open discussion on an open forum." :eek:
Then please, do tell me how my comment was problematic. I was just pointing out that sticking with Apple and expecting them to put any effort towards backwards compatibility is like repeatedly banging your head against a wall and getting mad because your head hurts. I don't have any sympathy for people who aren't willing to consider competing platforms that might be better for their needs over the long term.
 
Because Windows, and Android for that matter, would be far better for someone with your specific set of complaints. Apple will never be the company you want them to be. Ever.

Apple has, in the past, been the environment of "it just works".

Why do you want Apple to push into the territory of "if you're not running the latest version, with the latest hardware, it just won't work"?

When you're talking about an office suite, it's not that big a deal for most people. When you're talking about a $30k medical practice management suite, it's not quite the same ballgame. And when you're talking about $150k+ industrial production machines, you're reinforcing the concept that buying Apple is not a good call.

And yes, in the last 5 years, I dealt with a Mac Plus that controlled a $500k CNC machine. As far as I know, it still does.
 
I have already contacted Thereminator's devs. Such a fun little app that I've even used in live performance. Going to be sad to see that one fade away.

C'mon devs!!
 
I am curious, like what?
[doublepost=1496796453][/doublepost]
You must be new here? Apple has done this for decades. Part of reason Windows has had so much trouble is the complexity of decades of compatibility...

I use a lot of old abandoned fractal graphics programs for special effects that I will loose. I had to abandon tons of PowerPC apps already. I maintain an old MacBookPro just for PhotoGridX. Fontographer is another I don't want to abandon.

As far as being new here, I placed my order on my first Mac on January 25th 1984.
 
Now I don't look so stupid when I said that Apple needs to throw older Mac hardware and iPhones under the bus.
A 2017/18 MacOS should only be supported up to four year old hardware. Otherwise it's a nightmare for Apple to maintain support.
I know how Apple can nix all this legacy code and hardware, drop intel support and move on to Desktops and Laptops that only run on the A12xFusion chipset. Problem solved for Apple.
Maybe 10.13 should be the last macOS for the intel platform. They should make this announcement and get it over with. Let the old hardware and iPhone die from obselesence incompatible LTE versions and expired certificates so it just stops running in the next four years. Just as the original iPhone stopped working last year as Att nixed it from their networks.
 
That's not the point at all. Keeping 32 and 64-bit frameworks around means you pay the resident memory price for both simultaneously when apps use them. If the 32-bit clients go away, several hundred megs of RAM is freed on systems using typical apps.

And I can get 32GB of DDR4 2400 SODIMM RAM for $216.87 on Amazon right now. Several hundred MB of RAM is utterly irrelevant on modern hardware. (Yes, I know I can't get modern hardware in a current MBP, that's why I'm not buying a new one until I can.)
 
Actually apple has abandoned technology for decades. Ethernet ports,serial ports, floppy drives, printer ports, power PC, USB 3 type a ports, and the old iPod connector. Apple provides ways with adapters to still use the retiring tech for a while whether physical or software CPU emulation, but ultimately its gone.

Perhaps they should give more notice but this is not unusual for them in my opinion.


No. Apple has NOT done this for decades.

Do you have any idea how much work Apple put into making 68x00 binaries just work on PowerPC? And do you remember how incredibly seamless that transition was? Stuff JUST WORKED. You didn't even know it was a 68k binary running on your Mac in 1998.

The Mac OS 9 to 10 transition was a pain, but Classic worked beautifully until Apple killed it in 2007. That's right, over 20 years of backwards compatibility for some apps, all the way up until 10 years ago with 10.5.

So yeah, a decade of this is what we've had to endure.

Windows has so much trouble because they use a monolithic database known as the Registry to store a LOT of things that shouldn't be stored in the same database. It was a horrible mistake, a workaround for limitations of their previous versions, and they never saw fit to stop using it for new things. If M$ had decided to contain that mess before XP, they'd have solved a lot of problems, if they'd decided to contain it before 7, they'd still be better off. But no, it's still used in 10.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lexvo
I use a lot of old abandoned fractal graphics programs for special effects that I will loose. I had to abandon tons of PowerPC apps already. I maintain an old MacBookPro just for PhotoGridX. Fontographer is another I don't want to abandon.

As far as being new here, I placed my order on my first Mac on January 25th 1984.

Yes that's exactly my point :). Apple has long history of this thing
 
Add me to the list of unhappy users. I write books professionally, and I have just used Pages 4.3 (which is 32-bit) to do the layouts for ten highly illustrated books (because the 'new' Pages is so dumbed down that it is useless for the task). I also do conference presentations, and use Keynote 5.3 (which is 32-bit) because the new Keynote lacks features and comparabilities I need. I maintain a 10.5 GB website using iWeb (which is 32-bit) because no other website app yet has such a great good a combination of power and ease-of-use. I use MS Office (Word and Excel, which are 32-bit) because I refuse to be sucked into subscription apps. The easy solution is not to upgrade my OS when 32-bit compatibility is killed, but unfortunately even Macs aren't immortal and they need replacing eventually.
 
Now I don't look so stupid when I said that Apple needs to throw older Mac hardware and iPhones under the bus.
A 2017/18 MacOS should only be supported up to four year old hardware. Otherwise it's a nightmare for Apple to maintain support.
I know how Apple can nix all this legacy code and hardware, drop intel support and move on to Desktops and Laptops that only run on the A12xFusion chipset. Problem solved for Apple.
Maybe 10.13 should be the last macOS for the intel platform. They should make this announcement and get it over with. Let the old hardware and iPhone die from obselesence incompatible LTE versions and expired certificates so it just stops running in the next four years. Just as the original iPhone stopped working last year as Att nixed it from their networks.

Yes, you do look stupid when you say that.

Can you make a business case for not supporting 5 year old phones? Sort of.

Can you make a business case for not supporting 5 year old computers? Computers that cost thousands of dollars?

Not if you want to keep selling computers.

Apple sells computers for premium prices. That's fine, IF there's actual value in that. I have always been able to make a case to my clients that their investment in a Mac would pay off, both in lower support costs over the life of the computer and in longevity of the hardware. Old Macs have historically had a higher resale value than any other computers.

Drop support after 4 years? That resale value goes to almost nothing, the business case for spending more money up front goes away, and I can't convince anybody to buy a Mac over the Windoze garbage they're using now.
 
Do we get our money back for our old apps that don't run ?

I get pretty tired of hearing this tight fisted, bitching about small change for apps.
No one thinks anything of chucking that same amount of money at a street beggar or busker.
But ask them to pony up for an app they really want..?
I'd like to see ALL apps having an annual re-charge/purchase because only through proper funding can we expect proper quality and not advert riddle crap-ware.
 
Now I don't look so stupid when I said that Apple needs to throw older Mac hardware and iPhones under the bus.
A 2017/18 MacOS should only be supported up to four year old hardware. Otherwise it's a nightmare for Apple to maintain support.
I know how Apple can nix all this legacy code and hardware, drop intel support and move on to Desktops and Laptops that only run on the A12xFusion chipset. Problem solved for Apple.
Maybe 10.13 should be the last macOS for the intel platform. They should make this announcement and get it over with. Let the old hardware and iPhone die from obselesence incompatible LTE versions and expired certificates so it just stops running in the next four years. Just as the original iPhone stopped working last year as Att nixed it from their networks.
I really hope you're joking.
[doublepost=1496807909][/doublepost]
I get pretty tired of hearing this tight fisted, bitching about small change for apps.
No one thinks anything of chucking that same amount of money at a street beggar or busker.
But ask them to pony up for an app they really want..?
I'd like to see ALL apps having an annual re-charge/purchase because only through proper funding can we expect proper quality and not advert riddle crap-ware.
I get tired of people thinking that everyone has money to throw at things like this.
 
I believe Alice is in steam for windows at least. Got it for like $5

Problem solved. :)

Older games are very likely to not get updated, and some of them are still ones people play:

For instance: American McGee's Alice, I've managed to keep THAT one running with patches from MacOS 9 all the way to x86.... I doubt there will be a 64bit patch.

One of the reasons why OSX hasn't been good for game developers is that, they don't expect to support a game past 1-2 years at most.

I don't exactly use my mac for much gaming, but I have a handful of very well-played titles.

While I don't think people should be screaming at apple to keep 32 bit support, I also think folks should appreciate that every transition has loses, and modern apps don't always replace older ones.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.