Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I was merely referring to an ideological convolution.

And dropped the "real" off my previous post as it presumes a degree of absolute which I am not willing to concede.

We live in a society that is based on a certain degree of consensual domination. Deal with it.
Deal with domination? Drop your fascism!

We live in a free society with a free choice. Deal with it.
 
We live in the freest society*, interpersonal interaction implies dominance (albeit fluid).

there is no room for that sort of nuance with this person

they can’t comprehend it

they don’t even seem to understand that they are actually the one pushing the far right nazi fascist agenda

it’s a lost cause
 
  • Like
Reactions: JahBoolean
I gave up with the idea of imparting any kind of wisdom, purely masturbatory at this point.

The little things
 
Fascism can use any idea as a vehicle. Most ideas used by fascism appear to be “decent in nature” and this is how you easily get good people on board. Medical and “green” are perfect examples.
That's a non-sequitur. Like I said, your posts would suggest that you don't understand what fascism is. Fascism isn't requiring something through a democratic and/or constitutional process. A speed limit isn't fascism.
 
That's a non-sequitur. Like I said, your posts would suggest that you don't understand what fascism is. Fascism isn't requiring something through a democratic and/or constitutional process. A speed limit isn't fascism.
Who said that the speed limit is fascism? Violence in the streets is not fascism either.
And yes your life is much more in danger when driving a car than while walking around the unvaccinated.
 
Who said that the speed limit is fascism? Violence in the streets is not fascism either.
And yes your life is much more in danger when driving a car than while walking around the unvaccinated.

Violence in the street is facist when enacted by facists ...

I believe that the word you are looking for is a tyranny, accounting for your lack of logic one could see how you would get the two mixed up.
 
Who said that the speed limit is fascism? Violence in the streets is not fascism either.
It was what we call an analogy.

And yes your life is much more in danger when driving a car than while walking around the unvaccinated.
No, it's not. Around 40,000 people die in car accidents each year in the US.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
Deal with domination? Drop your fascism!

We live in a free society with a free choice. Deal with it.

As much as I want to believe it, I pretty much gave up on that thought. The blatant democide actions by the world in 2020 opened my eyes to that reality. It’ll only get worse from this point
 
  • Like
Reactions: avz
Anti vaxxers are calling to exclude pro vaxxers from participation in jobs and life in general?
Your logic would be somewhat passable if pro vaxxers and anti vaxxers had the same freedom of choice without any punishment.
One is calling for safety and better chance of life back to normal. Anti are calling for chaos. You are being played like cheap banjo.
Bye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
One is calling for safety and better chance of life back to normal. Anti are calling for chaos. You are being played like cheap banjo.
Bye.
You are still side stepping the fact that anti vaxxers are not being treated the same as pro vaxxers and being punished in a most fascist way for the choice they make in a "free" society. All for the delusional potential of unvaccinated person being "highly likely" to spread the virus maybe sometime in the future.

Same old manipulations that are easily seen right through. Thanks for not saying "it is for the safety of the children" and it is "for the democracy". At least the other poster honestly said that it is all about domination and some sort of masturbatory consensus in society(or between him and another poster).
Keep safe.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cbautis2
You are still side stepping the fact that anti vaxxers are not being treated the same as pro vaxxers and being punished in a most fascist way for the choice they make in a "free" society.
No one is "side stepping" the fact. We just understand that it's perfectly normal to treat people differently based on their decisions. Again, mandatory vaccination has existed since Washington. Again, that's not fascist.

All for the delusional potential of unvaccinated person being "highly likely" to spread the virus maybe sometime in the future.
There is an actual increased likelihood of unvaccinated people spreading the virus.
 
You are still side stepping the fact that anti vaxxers are not being treated the same as pro vaxxers and being punished in a most fascist way for the choice they make in a "free" society. All for the delusional potential of unvaccinated person being "highly likely" to spread the virus maybe sometime in the future.

Same old manipulations that are easily seen right through. Thanks for not saying "it is for the safety of the children" and it is "for the democracy". At least the other poster honestly said that it is all about domination and some sort of masturbatory consensus in society(or between him and another poster).
Keep safe.
*mastrubatory consensus* I'll pin that term for further use.

Stay safe though.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
You are still side stepping the fact that anti vaxxers are not being treated the same as pro vaxxers and being punished in a most fascist way for the choice they make in a "free" society. All for the delusional potential of unvaccinated person being "highly likely" to spread the virus maybe sometime in the future.

Same old manipulations that are easily seen right through. Thanks for not saying "it is for the safety of the children" and it is "for the democracy". At least the other poster honestly said that it is all about domination and some sort of masturbatory consensus in society(or between him and another poster).
Keep safe.

pretty sure the masturbatory part was making fun of your ignorance and inability to actually comprehend what anyone is saying, including, it seems, yourself

you are capable only of parroting the most elementary far right conspiracy theories at the shallowest level and don’t even seem to understand what they mean and where they come from

because you either cannot or chose not to understand what anyone else is saying you respond with non-sequitors and comments that belie your inability to comprehend the comments you are responding to

as has been said, it’s the anti-vaxers that are actually aligned with the fascists, nazis, tyrannically anti-democratic elements and hyper-capitalists. the idea is to both create chaos and to test how far they can push people in to believing and acting against their own interests

in your case that seems to be pretty far

you are either knowingly one of them, or being played

in the case of the former, **** off; if it’s the latter, we are here to help dig you out if only you would listen
 
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge on Nov. 15 to give it until the year 2076 to fully release the documents in its possession tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

55 years? Why? Not only are they shielded from liability, but from transparency?
 
as has been said, it’s the anti-vaxers that are actually aligned with the fascists, nazis, tyrannically anti-democratic elements and hyper-capitalists. the idea is to both create chaos and to test how far they can push people in to believing and acting against their own interests
I may add that expressing qualms with the current rollout of sanitary measures is quite natural and healthy.

And I (at the very least) do not mind rational and reasonable debate on the application of said measures.

The opinions you seem to have espoused are none of the above and merely the internalization of said qualms by the far-right yoke of society.
 
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge on Nov. 15 to give it until the year 2076 to fully release the documents in its possession tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

55 years? Why? Not only are they shielded from liability, but from transparency?

you know the epoch times literally just makes things up right?

or at best conflates things to seem like they are something they are not

to be fair, since i can’t actually read the articles i can’t address them specifically
 
Last edited:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge on Nov. 15 to give it until the year 2076 to fully release the documents in its possession tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

55 years? Why? Not only are they shielded from liability, but from transparency?

At least you showed us which faucet is dropping that sewage water in that big empty bowl of yours =).
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) asked a federal judge on Nov. 15 to give it until the year 2076 to fully release the documents in its possession tied to the approval of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine.

55 years? Why? Not only are they shielded from liability, but from transparency?
Could you post a link to the court documents? They will probably answer the question you are asking.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nathansz
More that 400,000 last year?!?!
There is an actual increased likelihood of unvaccinated people spreading the virus.
Some of those who died walked around the vaccinated. Vaccines do suppress the immune system in case you did not know and increase the likelihood of transmission. Actual increased likelihood still means that you are punishing people for something that never yet happened around a particular unvaccinated person who ALREADY lost a job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.