Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
67,671
38,120


Apple will pay $95 million to settle a proposed class action lawsuit involving Siri spying accusations, reports Reuters. The lawsuit alleges that Apple recorded conversations captured with accidental Siri activations, and then shared information from those conversations with third-party advertisers.

siri-glow.png

Two plaintiffs claimed that after speaking about products like Air Jordan shoes and Olive Garden, their devices showed ads for those products, while another said he received ads for a surgical treatment after discussing it privately with his doctor.

The lawsuit dates back to 2019, after a report outed the private conversations that contractors were privy to when Siri was accidentally activated. Apple was using contractors to evaluate Siri recordings to make improvements to the service, and employees claimed to have heard confidential medical information, drug deals, intimate moments, and other private data.

Apple was never secretive about the fact that some Siri recordings were analyzed by humans, but the company's privacy terms at the time did not explicitly state that there was human oversight of Siri. The customers that filed the lawsuit said that Apple did not inform consumers that they are "regularly being recorded without consent," and they claimed they would not have purchased Apple devices had they known about the Siri recordings.

While the lawsuit initially focused on Apple's lack of disclosure, the first filing was dismissed in February 2021 because it did not include enough concrete data about the recordings that Apple allegedly collected. An amended complaint that focused on Siri recordings used for "targeted advertising" was refiled in September 2021, and that was allowed to move forward.

There has been no evidence that Apple ever provided Siri recordings or information from Siri recordings to advertisers, and Apple's privacy policies have long made it clear that any data collected from Siri for the purpose of improving the feature is anonymized and not associated with a specific user.

In the settlement filing, Apple says that it "continues to deny any and all alleged wrongdoing and liability, specifically denies each of the Plaintiffs' contentions and claims, and continues to deny that the Plaintiffs' claims and allegations would be suitable for class action status." Apple is settling to avoid further costs of litigation.

The settlement has received preliminary approval from the court. According to the filing, all current or former owners or purchasers of a Siri device in the United States whose confidential or private communications were obtained by Apple between September 17, 2014 and December 31, 2024 are considered class members and could be eligible for a payment.

A settlement website will be set up to identify those eligible to participate within 45 days, with Apple required to share contact information for customers who purchased a device with Siri capabilities. Claim information will be collected until May 15, 2025, after which time the settlement will be finalized and payments will go out to eligible customers. Each class member will be able to submit claims for up to five Siri devices, receiving up to $20 for each one. The actual settlement payment will depend on the total number of valid claims that are submitted.

After the 2019 scandal about contractors listening to accidental Siri recordings, Apple temporarily suspended its Siri evaluation program, stopped using contractors, and implemented options that allow users to delete Siri recordings and block them from being listened to. In later updates, Apple moved some Siri processing on-device, reducing the content that's uploaded to its servers.

Update: In a statement provided to MacRumors, Apple made it clear that Siri data has never been used for marketing purposes or sold to any company for any reason.
Siri has been engineered to protect user privacy from the beginning. Siri data has never been used to build marketing profiles and it has never been sold to anyone for any purpose. Apple settled this case to avoid additional litigation so we can move forward from concerns about third-party grading that we already addressed in 2019. We use Siri data to improve Siri, and we are constantly developing technologies to make Siri even more private.
Apple aims to do as much Siri processing on-device as it can, and in these situations, no data is uploaded anywhere. Reading a message aloud, for example, is done on-device with no content sent to Apple's servers. Data that is processed on Apple's servers, such as a request that requires location information, is assigned a random identifier and is not tied directly do an Apple Account.

Transcripts of Siri conversations can be used to improve Siri, Dictation, and Search, but any audio sharing is opt-in and has been since 2019, plus transcripts can be deleted at any time.

Article Link: Apple to Shell Out $95 Million to Settle Siri Spying Lawsuit [Updated]
 
Last edited:
"After the 2019 scandal about contractors listening to accidental ‌Siri‌ recordings"

accidental. Right. lol.

back in the day when I worked for Leapforce, as a subcontractor for Google, I must have listened to endless thousands of recordings (sometimes brief phrases, sometimes several seconds of dialogue). 100% of those recordings were clearly and obviously when the phone was just in the room. Zero of them were deliberate queries. Interesting how Google escaped a similar scandal when they were doing the same thing.

btw: There was one company (can't recall its name of the top of my head) that recruited "raters" for Apple. They did the same work we did, for the most part.
 
Apple was never secretive about the fact that some ‌Siri‌ recordings were analyzed by humans
.. and still Siri is dumb AF.

My wife and I get ads for things we were talking about all the time, even though we weren't searching for it on our computers. I don't think it's Apple, but Google tracking the tar out of us. They have their hands in so many things it doesn't surprise me.
 
"After the 2019 scandal about contractors listening to accidental ‌Siri‌ recordings"

accidental. Right. lol.

back in the day when I worked for Leapforce, as a subcontractor for Google, I must have listened to endless thousands of recordings (sometimes brief phrases, sometimes several seconds of dialogue). 100% of those recordings were clearly and obviously when the phone was just in the room. Zero of them were deliberate queries. Interesting how Google escaped a similar scandal when they were doing the same thing.
This is a case of being judged by your own standards. Anyone remember the old Red Dwarf episode The Inquisitor?
Apple is Kryten and Lister. Google is Rimmer and the Cat.

With Google there was no scandal as everybody knew Google's MO.
 
How do they know this came from Siri? I think it’s highly unlikely Apple would do this. I’d be more suspicious of Facebook/Insta/Snap, etc having microphone access and being allowed to run in the background. I don’t give any social media apps mic access and I’ve never had any of these weird targeted advertisement moments

Apple would have relatively little to gain and a lot to lose if they did this
 
It was direct Siri recordings. Apps don't have access to that.

But...

Two plaintiffs claimed that after speaking about products like Air Jordan shoes and Olive Garden, their devices showed ads for those products, while another said he received ads for a surgical treatment after discussing it privately with his doctor.

In these types of cases, are we to believe that Siri was accidentally triggered, recorded what was said AND Apple then sold that to advertisers causing ads to be shown? Seems unlikely.

There has been no evidence that Apple ever provided Siri recordings or information from Siri recordings to advertisers, and Apple's privacy policies have long made it clear that any data collected from Siri for the purpose of improving the feature is anonymized and not associated with a specific user.

I believe there is no doubt that Apple provided recordings to third parties for Siri research, but how are we to make the jump to advertisers?

Apps can and do have access to the microphone, were the plaintiffs perhaps mistaken about how their talk of Air Jordans etc were disseminated to advertisers? This is far more likely.
 
I feel vindicated slightly for my pedantic action of disabling Siri on all my devices and disabling camera, microphone, photo, contacts and location access to almost every app.
I’m pretty sure this lawsuit and controversy is why you now get asked if you want to “help improve Siri” by sharing recordings.

Something I always say no to.
 
The voice recording for ads is everywhere. Meta apps (instagram, facebook, etc) are notorious for it. The mic is constantly on and the AI listens for keywords that then go to your profile and show up in your google ads, youtube ads, amazon recommended, etc.

If apple cared, they would add the "ask next time" or "just this once" dialog box whenever an app asks to use the microphone the same way they ask to use location. So you can set it to "always" or "never" or "ask next time"

Literally nothing in your life is private- anything around you with IO is being used to track and collect data about you and send it back to a server to monetize
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.