This isn't the 90's all over again.
Wow, I'm so glad the Macintosh OS didn't take off and create a "monopoly" in the 90's. A monopolizing computing platform really wasn't the answer going forward. That's why we have Microsoft Windows™ which is not a mono.... oh wait never mind.
I get so sick of the Universal/NBC rescueing us from the evil iTunes monopoly schtick. So, one answer is to sell TV shows on XBOX live exclusively? Really? How is that any better. Lets see, to get one episode of The Office on iTunes I need a computer (Mac or PC doesn't mater). I probably already have one of those. Then I download a free copy of iTunes and pay $1.99 to download and watch the episode. If I want I can buy an iPod so I can watch it anywhere, but I don't have to. But NBC has a much better option planned. I'm supposed to buy a $400 XBox then most likely subscribe to XBox live then pay at least $3-$4. Or maybe you won't need the XBox there will be some software you can download to play it. Either way you'll NEED to have Windows. Where is this free market consumer choice Universal/NBC wants to deliver us to?
This isn't Apple of the 90's. This isn't a computer or OS or any product they invented or assembeled. They are just a reseller in this case. They never intend to be the only place in town to buy music, movies an TV shows. The rest of the market is just too incompetent to come up with something better. Imagine if when CDs came out only RadioShack had any sucess selling them by finding the right price and market. Would people say RadioShack had a monopoly? And would the solution be to pull CDs from RadioShack's shelves and let Best Buy sell more expensive versions that don't play on everyone's CD players?
And as for margins, Apple can decide whatever it wants. Charmin doesn't know as much about how much to charge for toilet paper as Walmart does. That's Walmarts job, they figure out what people will pay for a set quantity. Plus they need to maintain shelf space, employees, electricity, etc. to sell the stuff. And maybe they should make a little money on top to of that or why else do it, right? Walmart's really good at selling toilet paper, and they think $1.99 a pack is about right. Charmin is already getting $1 of that but say they want 3. Guess who's not selling Charmin TP anymore? Resellers know the market better then producers when it comes to inexpensive items. Walmart proves this. They tell producers how much of a cut they'll get.
But lets say NBC sells the shows direct. 2 options. No DRM with comercials. If that is true the price will have to be free or less then $1.99. Of course they'll need to set up an online store and pay for bandwith. Ouch, that sounds hard and expensive. But there is option 2, lisence a DRM and online store front. Who has one? Microsoft. But wont that be just like what they had with Apple and iTunes? No, because it's Microsoft and it's okay for them to get royalties from EVERYTHING.
But what makes Microsoft even awesomer is that no only do they get money from licensing the DRM and storefront. They get money from licensing the proprietery WMA/WMV format that they'll forvce you to use. And everyone that wants to play it will have to pay that tax too. I want all that so bad I can hardly contain mysewelf!
Apple just wants to sell you a damn TV show so you can fill your video iPod (which you don't have to buy). NBC made Apple put a lock on it so, yeah, there is a Fairplay device lock in. Why should Apple maintain that for free. But the H.264 MPEG 4 and ACC are both open formats. Apple isn't making money off them. They just want to sell a damn iPod. They don't care what you put on it or where it came from. The only reason they do sell content is because nobody else stepped up.
A lot of other posters with decent critical thinking skill have brought up most of these points. You people are supper cool. Some other people just don't get it. Learn how to THINK not just spout regurgitated soundbytes.
P.S. I'll miss The Office and 30Rock. I'm an American living in the UK and that was my only way to get it (legally).