Thanks NBC, that just decided me on buying an EyeTV hybrid... Refurbished, some are available for less than $100 at OWC.
altho I came down on different conclusion, but your analysis is very nice indeed.I think NBC (Universal) is going to be the bigger loser in this ultimately, though, I would caution Apple not to display too much hubris going forward, because there is a growing perception that partnerships with Apple benefit Apple more than anyone else. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but it's the perception that counts. In that regard, Apple's press release was a wise and timely move.
I still wonder if Apple should not have just bitten the bullet on this one. For one thing, NBC could not have honestly wanted there episodes going for $4.99 while every other network remained at $1.99. It sounds like it was the first move in a game of hardball negotiating that Apple was simply not willing to entertain. In terms of big picture though, Apple could have afforded to take less profit, or even a slight loss, because they are not really in the business of selling music and tv shows, they are in the business of making iPods (and Macs, and iPhones...and one day AppleTVs). iTunes only exists to support the realm of downloadable content, because the more people there are out there downloading music and video, the more iPods Apple is going to sell. Let's face it, if I'm going to watch video on the go I'm probably going to do it on an iPod. As a percentage of revenue, everything Apple makes off of iTunes is pocket change, so why they would want to play hardball with profit sharing kind of confuses me. They are going to punish NBC over this, and have them come back with their tails between their legs, but it'll probably just make other content providers nervous about who they are currently in bed with, and thus explore the option of other alternatives.
In any event, NBC should have known better. For one thing they got a hell of a lot of free advertising through iTunes, and I am almost certain that shows like Heroes would not have been as successful had it not been for iTunes, and people's ability to catch up on eps they missed, or get into the show late into the season. They are completely overplaying their hand, but I guess my point is, so might Apple...
I think i have noticed that networks are starting to make their own websites available to sell and view their shows.So NBC might just decide their episodes on their own website for $5?!?!
THat sounds smart![]()
I will laugh my ass off ..
I think NBC (Universal) is going to be the bigger loser in this ultimately, though, I would caution Apple not to display too much hubris going forward, because there is a growing perception that partnerships with Apple benefit Apple more than anyone else. I'm not saying that this is the case here, but it's the perception that counts. In that regard, Apple's press release was a wise and timely move.
I still wonder if Apple should not have just bitten the bullet on this one. For one thing, NBC could not have honestly wanted there episodes going for $4.99 while every other network remained at $1.99. It sounds like it was the first move in a game of hardball negotiating that Apple was simply not willing to entertain. In terms of big picture though, Apple could have afforded to take less profit, or even a slight loss, because they are not really in the business of selling music and tv shows, they are in the business of making iPods (and Macs, and iPhones...and one day AppleTVs). iTunes only exists to support the realm of downloadable content, because the more people there are out there downloading music and video, the more iPods Apple is going to sell. Let's face it, if I'm going to watch video on the go I'm probably going to do it on an iPod. As a percentage of revenue, everything Apple makes off of iTunes is pocket change, so why they would want to play hardball with profit sharing kind of confuses me. They are going to punish NBC over this, and have them come back with their tails between their legs, but it'll probably just make other content providers nervous about who they are currently in bed with, and thus explore the option of other alternatives.
In any event, NBC should have known better. For one thing they got a hell of a lot of free advertising through iTunes, and I am almost certain that shows like Heroes would not have been as successful had it not been for iTunes, and people's ability to catch up on eps they missed, or get into the show late into the season. They are completely overplaying their hand, but I guess my point is, so might Apple...
Thanks NBC, that just decided me on buying an EyeTV hybrid... Refurbished, some are available for less than $100 at OWC.
Looks like I'll be downloading "The Office" and "30 Rock" from other (free) sources.
mark your words and lets wait and see.
Is there anyone besides clevin who actually believes NBC will sell their shows at a LOWER price than $1.99 per episode?
Anyone?
Fine with me, I didn't watch any shows on NBC anyways. In fact, besides sports, I could do without the channel on my cable box. I wish I could just choose the handful of channels I actually watch and then just not pay for the rest. Discovery, History, SciFi, AMC, National Geographic, FX, HBO, Cinemax, Starz.
This is way off, and it's something many people have gotten wrong in this thread.
Once and for all, this is the NBC-Universal breakdown:
NBC was bought be the GE Corporation some time back (in the 80s, I think). They were the sole owners until 2004 when Universal took a 20% stake in the company.
Universal itself is owned by French conglomerate Vivendi.
So NBC-Universal is owned 80% by the GE Corporation and 20% by Vivendi SA.
NBC and Universal are NOT the same company, never have been, and don't plan to be anytime soon...
Go to this link: http://www.nbc.com/Footer/Contact_Us/
Write NBC and tell them not be be greedy like the record biz.. Do it today!!!! Be creative, tell them how much you buy legally and that they will only push their paying customers to download free somewhere.
So, who is going to sell NBC shows online, if not Apple?