This is the GSMA standard for E2EE. Google may have to modify Google Messages to be compliant with this standard.
What would be the point of that? iMessage is encrypted, iDevices and Macs can use iMessage and get E2EE. One can only assume this is for communication with Android users, there's no point otherwise.Will Apple implement E2EE the same way? Meaning only between iDevices and not with Android?
ExactlyNo one cares.
"The rest of the world"This is truly embarrassing for a so-called computer and telephone company to not support these basic building blocks. iMessages is dead, Tim Apple. The rest of the world moved on a long time ago.
I'm guessing you don't understand the meaning of "E2EE for cross-platform RCS messages" because cross-platform means E2EE between iOS and Android devices. The only reason that Google uses a software extension (based on the Signal protocol) on top of the universal profile for Android to Android E2EE is because E2EE was never part of the RCS universal profile until now. With RCS 3.0 E2EE using MLS will be part of the standard and it'll be adopted. This is good news.Will Apple implement E2EE the same way? Meaning only between iDevices and not with Android?
You mustn’t live in the US where no one uses WhatsAppI turned this off immediately after updating the year it was released. I don’t know a single person using Android that uses the plain messaging app, it’s all WhatsApp.
Ulitmately it'll only be an issue if Apple goes with the standard and Google sticks with their current "do it themselves" implementation (or does that already match the standard?)What would be the point of that? iMessage is encrypted, iDevices and Macs can use iMessage and get E2EE. One can only assume this is for communication with Android users, there's no point otherwise.
It would be convenient for me, gotta use Signal for talking to Android users now.
That‘s part of UP 2.7.Does the latest version of the RCS spec that includes encryption, also include the ability to edit and unsend messages?
Yup, Android already has support for MLS so it should be ready when Apple decides to push the 3.0 UP-date. LolI'm guessing you don't understand the meaning of "E2EE for cross-platform RCS messages" because cross-platform means E2EE between iOS and Android devices. The only reason that Google uses a software extension (based on the Signal protocol) on top of the universal profile for Android to Android E2EE is because E2EE was never part of the RCS universal profile until now. With RCS 3.0 E2EE using MLS will be part of the standard and it'll be adopted. This is good news.
The specifications make it mandatory otherwise you cannot claim to be UP X complaint.That‘s part of UP 2.7.
No one knows whether Apple actually implements these features or keeps their RCS more basic than others.
And, for those that don’t want to look up old iOS images, there were a number of years where texting on the iPhone was SMS only (and then SMS/MMS only, in the beginning the iPhone did NOT support MMS!). It was green because phone related communication apps were green (that’s why the icon for making a voice call was green as well). When Apple created iMessage the goal was to indicate “this message is treated differently by your carrier from the other one”. The default green stayed green and the app icon stayed green, they just removed SMS from it, and just the iMessage bubbles were blue.People should try to keep in mind the original purpose of bubble colors.
SMS is green, because it (used to) cost money. Green is the color of money. Carrier plans would include a small number of texts with pay-per-message billing after that number was exceeded. It was a thing. It was horrible.
iMessage is blue, because it is freeeee. Any data plan - and postpaid data plans in the US at the time universally included unlimited data - can easily absorb the amount of data used by text only messaging. Apple wanted to make it clear that these messages are different, even though you use the same app to send them. These messages don't cost you money.
These days, the bubbles work for Apple in encouraging young people to harass their friends into getting iPhones, so Apple will leave things the way they are.
No other manufacturer had "figured it out" except for Google who was using a proprietary standard to get E2EE. Google wanted Apple to hand over their data and user data to them in order to use Google's implementation of E2EE on RCS. I get that it's confusing, especially when so many people are using their own confustion to grind an axe they have against Apple.Headline that basically covers everything Apple is doing currently:
"Apple to implement beta version of basic functionality years after every other manufacturer on the planet has already figured it out."
Agree, Whatsapp is a (like it or not) worldwide standard except US, China and probably couple of countries using telegram.I turned this off immediately after updating the year it was released. I don’t know a single person using Android that uses the plain messaging app, it’s all WhatsApp.
Agree, Whatsapp is a (like it or not) worldwide standard except US, China and probably couple of countries using telegram.
Google does not use a proprietary standard for E2EE. They rely on the open-source Signal Protocol, the same encryption standard used by popular messaging apps like Messenger, WhatsApp, Instagram, and Skype.No other manufacturer had "figured it out" except for Google who was using a proprietary standard to get E2EE.
It's one thing to be unaware of a situation, but it's entirely different to fabricate false information out of ignorance. Google does not own the Signal Protocol. It is an open-source protocol maintained by the Signal Technology Foundation.Google wanted Apple to hand over their data and user data to them in order to use Google's implementation of E2EE on RCS.
Apple chose to implement an outdated 2.4 UP profile when they could have adopted the newer version and incorporated the Signal extension for E2EE. However, I’m certain that Apple’s adoption of RCS ultimately pushed them to accelerate the process of adding E2EE to the standard. The real issue with Apple is that they seemingly waited until government pressure forced their hand before taking action on cross-platform text communication with Android.I get that it's confusing, especially when so many people are using their own confustion to grind an axe they have against Apple.
Do you have a source on that because... while it sounds plausible, I think I would have heard it before.People should try to keep in mind the original purpose of bubble colors.
SMS is green, because it (used to) cost money. Green is the color of money. Carrier plans would include a small number of texts with pay-per-message billing after that number was exceeded. It was a thing. It was horrible.
iMessage is blue, because it is freeeee. Any data plan - and postpaid data plans in the US at the time universally included unlimited data - can easily absorb the amount of data used by text only messaging. Apple wanted to make it clear that these messages are different, even though you use the same app to send them. These messages don't cost you money.
These days, the bubbles work for Apple in encouraging young people to harass their friends into getting iPhones, so Apple will leave things the way they are.
Actually that’s incorrect all the main networks apart from Vodafone do. o2,three and ee all doA pity only EE and BT use RCS in the UK. A lot of providers still don't do Visual Voicemail
Even on a 25gb plan, for the five people who had the new ATT plans that I forgot rolled out around the same time....the amount of data iMessage used was not material. Maybe if you sent videos.Do you have a source on that because... while it sounds plausible, I think I would have heard it before.
AT&T ended unlimited data for iPhones in 2010. iMessage didn't launch until 2011. So the messages always consumed data which always cost money. And I think AT&T iPhone plans have included free unlimited texting and calling from the start. So... you kind of have it backwards. Texting may have cost the recipient depending on their plan, but it was free to the iPhone user. And iMessages would have only been free if the iPhone was on Wifi.