Gold and platinum don't mix with consumer and disposable devices. When your
Watch becomes obsolete, what will you do? Send your watch for melting?

While you're amusing yourself with your own version of comedy....I'm sure Apple won't be displaying watches for people to try on that aren't available for months.
So? You buy it for the fact that it never tarnishes, not because flawless platinum looks the same as flawless aluminum. The difference is that the flawless platinum will still be flawless in 100 years. The aluminum will have flaws within a year.
It could be a new formulation, however. Metallurgy is an ongoing science. They did get a patent last December.
So? You buy it for the fact that it never tarnishes, not because flawless platinum looks the same as flawless aluminum. The difference is that the flawless platinum will still be flawless in 100 years. The aluminum will have flaws within a year.
Platinum would be to polished aluminum what Sapphire would have been to Gorilla Glass: visually unnoticeable while dinging the wallet in a very noticeable way. Both would look silver and require you to verbally tell people that it's the platinum edition if you want to distinguish your watch from the multitudes of cheaper aluminum versions in the wild.
Gold will at least be obviously not aluminum, though, even there, gold electroplating the cheaper model would yield a visual effect very close to if not unnoticeable to the "real" gold model. I expect to see shops pop up offering to electroplate the aluminum version right away (much like the shops that can make Macbook aluminum pretty much any color you want)...
Image
Good luck Specialists, you poor bastards.
It's quite sad to me that your thoughts go to having to announce to other people that you have the more expensive model.
Purchasing any item should be justified by your own desire to own it... not by whether others will perceive it as an "expensive" model rather than a "cheaper" one that looks similar.
Really sad.
It's quite sad to me that your thoughts go to having to announce to other people that you have the more expensive model.
Purchasing any item should be justified by your own desire to own it... not by whether others will perceive it as an "expensive" model rather than a "cheaper" one that looks similar.
Really sad.
Hmmm, I seem to remember the 6 Plus being back ordered in different models for months at the beginning. Pretty sure that's what OP is referring to.
It's quite sad to me that your thoughts go to having to announce to other people that you have the more expensive model.
Purchasing any item should be justified by your own desire to own it... not by whether others will perceive it as an "expensive" model rather than a "cheaper" one that looks similar.
Really sad.
While you're amusing yourself with your own version of comedy....I'm sure Apple won't be displaying watches for people to try on that aren't available for months.
So, about that gold....
I wouldn't be a bit surprised if an iPhone in the near future would be made of it as well. Cost would probably be staggering, but meh. If Vertu can make a go of it, Apple could as well.
I love how some Apple sites announced Apple's invention of a new type of gold... It's an alloy folks, something jewelers have been doing for years.
Ouch. That was a bit harsh.
Yes!!! Unfortunately how most of our experiences will be!"Ok great yes I decided I like this 42mm with this bracelet in this color. I'll take it"
-----
"Ok sir that model is on backorder for 6 weeks, and that strap is on backorder for 2 months"
-----------
"uhhhh"
isn't that why people buy watches? "mine is more expensive than yours" "oh u wear an Hublot watch? feel free to use the VIP entrance into P1"