yes wifi has always been required for air play. The only difference is now you wont need a network to connect too which will make airplay in the car much more doable now. Hopefully apple opens up the video standard for car systems.
Since always....
I fail to see how this isn't just bluetooth with a different name now though?
what everyone is missing is that this essentially is like bluetooth, except you don't have to go through your settings to pair a device. if the speakers and your phone are both on and near each other, boom, wireless streaming with the tap of an icon.
I don't think app,e will enter that market. I'm not sure where you live but with Rogers cable, you can get a Rogers one number, One number for your home, cell and VoIP on a pc.
Every iPad has wifi so...... you do the math.
I can't see Bluetooth, in its current form, handling that adequately (the video). I think the max speed of Bluetooth 4.0 is the same as 3.0 (about half of best-possible speed of the older 802.11g wifi). Seems like the enhancements in Bluetooth 4.0 were mostly for low power, low data-rate, applications (e.g., a watch to a smartphone).
As others have noted this is merely using the thing AirDrop uses: wifi. In the case of AirDrop, and the reason it requires later model macs, is that it can communicate peer-to-peer while not touching its usual WiFi router connection.
I think this is going to be a good thing. Sometimes I toss an Apple TV in my bag for trips, in case I want to use Airplay at a hotel. But having to join the dang network, especially with a captive portal as used by most all hotels, is a real pain. Really an unnecessary pain. Why should I have to join a network with my ATV when it and my iPhone--and iPad--all have wifi anyway?
I don't really see the intended purpose of this for automobiles. Bluetooth already handles that fairly OK, and aside from initial pairing there is not much to setup. I look at it the other way around: why don't all cars have wifi now?
Michael
Just wish they'd make it so I could extend the screen to my TV and not mirror it. I dont need two screens showing the same damn thing.
Not really. I'm not that dumb.
Keep in mind that while all Macs have WiFi, only the newer models support AirDrop, so you do the thinking, then do the math.
Good point. But I believe airdrop's older mac limitations are software and not hardware. There's a way to get older Macs to share files through airdrop.
Since all iPads can use airdrop, I'm sure any peer to peer connection through wifi apple will allow would work. I might be wrong though.
Isn't this already called Bluetooth?
Nope, the limitation for full Airdrop functionality lies in the hardware.
There is a way to enable it on an incompatible Mac, but it will not function 100% as it should. It's a partial solution that in the end makes no sense enabling on an old Mac.
.
"According to you" lol...anyway.
Is the PC wired into the network via ethernet? That's your connection. BUT that's not using airplay. That's HOME SHARING. Airplay is wireless technology and specifc to wireless devices.
From the apple site.
Welcome to this site.I think you are very wrong on this. Do this little experiment that I just did:
Start playing music on Airplay speakers/ATV from your iPhone on the same WiFi network. Based on your theory, the speakers/ATV and your iPhone used the WiFi network to establish the initial connection, but are now connected AdHoc via their WiFi radios. So now unplug your wireless router. As you will see, the music stops. That is because your iPhone is connected via the router to your speakers/ATV.
What you are suggesting would be possible if AirPLay Direct existed. Bluetooth works like this, but is not an AirPlay technology even though it looks seamless to a iOS user.
Bluetooth has a maximum data throughput of about 2.5 mb/sec - compared to a (again, theoretical) 600 mb/sec capacity for 802.11. In real world use, I've found Bluetooth-only speakers to suffer from audible distortion and significant lag that was far more noticeable than using Airplay over a wifi network.