Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I think if Apple wants to go for the jugular and do some really scientific ego stroking, they ought to include the millions of bloggers in their viral advertising department.
 
Aldi and Dollar General too...

Nein. Aldi ist ein deutsche Firma.

Aldi's founder is the brother of the owner of Trader Joe's. Well, technically they took over their mother's grocery store, kept expanding and eventually split the company in half.
 
and for the folk making $60-$70 a month on their apps in this sustainable "economy" to make a living, can you apply for welfare or iStamps? Let's see some clone solitaire subsidy programs.
 
That's not splitting hairs. It's being factual. "Sorry" if I'm not buying into the Apple PR machine on their loose idea of "job creation." Feel free to buy into it as much as you want.

As a PR/Marketing professional for over 20 years - I can not only read between the lines - but spot spin a mile away.

You don't have to be sorry. You are obviously one of those people who will go out of his way to find fault with whatever news - spin or not - comes across your computer monitor. You can't admit there is more than one way to look at this. I see that Apple really created an industry with small app development, and I'm not alone in that belief. Indeed, it's a $4 billion dollar a year industry. "BUT THEY DIDN'T CREATE JOBS" you scream. So be it. You can only see the half empty side of things. You must be a fantastic PR person.
 
I just have to know - was LTD counted or not in this tally?

Kidding.. sincerely...

----------

You don't have to be sorry. You are obviously one of those people who will go out of his way to find fault with whatever news - spin or not - comes across your computer monitor. You can't admit there is more than one way to look at this. I see that Apple really created an industry with small app development, and I'm not alone in that belief. Indeed, it's a $4 billion dollar a year industry. "BUT THEY DIDN'T CREATE JOBS" you scream. So be it. You can only see the half empty side of things. You must be a fantastic PR person.

Now you're just twisting what I said out of some emotional response you're having.

I never said they didn't create jobs. Nor did I say they didn't create any job. And you have no idea what I can and can't admit to. Take a deep breath and try not to get so heated about something that really shouldn't be "personal" to you.
 
And a lot of jobs would disappear if it weren't for opportunities.

Almost all jobs (outside the government sector) are because some businessman took a risk that some opportunity would pay off more than the cost of hiring people to do the work.

Yeah but apple isn't hiring anyone for the app store???!?!?!?!! They are not employing people based on risk and opportunity.

They are getting paid to run the app store and offer people the opportunity to develop at their own risk. What's guaranteed for apple is that they don't have to pay to run the app store since they offload the cost to devs to cover their own expenses. What's also guaranteed for them is that they get 30% cut so they are also making a profit besides the running cost. They are also able to sell boatloads more ipads and iphones by virtue of the creative capital devs are creating for them. But they don't seem to be interested at all if the price is driven too low for developers to survive, and yet they claim they are offering all 200,000 of them jobs. How more hypocritical can one be?

Your example is that of the entrepreneur who says I am employing people and I am taking the risk of my investment in them and our enterprise. Apple is saying cover my expenses for the store, offer me a cut off of your labour, help me sell more devices, and I don't care to create a business plan on how many of you actually survive or sponsor or control the market to ensure that most of you with something worthwhile do survive in the end...cause to apple the app store is a "free market", but a free market in which the market owner isn't taking any financial risk, just the participator in that market. How convenient...

----------

$10/day earns you more money than half of the world's population, that's over 3 billion people.
The purchasing power of $10/day is as I am sure you know quite different for each one of those 3 billion people...
 
a) you didn't PAY to get hired, did you? What you're describing is different altogether. IF Apple is counting everyone that has paid to be a developer as an "employee" (a job they created) it's incredibly dubious. They can call them customers - not employees.

Why are you not acknowledging the obvious difference between a job created and an "employee"?

And many, many people have jobs where they pay to get hired. I'm not sure what you are getting at here.
 
None of those institutions claim they are creating jobs. They are issuing certifications.

Just try to get a job as a medical doctor in the U.S. without your board certification. Many jobs and business opportunities have entry and start-up costs. Many significantly higher than getting into iPhone development.

For the iOS dev game: $3B+ payed out versus $99 * 250k to get in the game sounds like positive betting odds to me. Add buying a Mac and the odds are still way positive, better than you'll even get counting cards in Vegas.
 
From what I've read paying US worker wages would add about $65 to the manufacturing costs of the devices which isn't that big a deal compared to things like the increased logistics of more transoceanic shipping and finding mid-level engineers in the quantity they need. I read one report that said it took Apple 2 weeks to hire all the mid-level personal they needed in China and if they would've tried the same thing in the US the search would have taken around 9 months. The US has bigger hurdles to overcome right now than blue collar wages.

Cost of manufacturing in the U.S. is a big enough deal, I would think, to make a substantial dent in margins -- and consequently something Apple would not seriously consider. Is anyone assembling consumer electronics products in the U.S. anymore? That work started moving to Mexico long before it went to China. At the risk of turning this thread into even more of a food fight, I'd have to say that U.S. workers have been getting drop-kicked for over 30 years now. We talk a good talk about education and training, then continue to cause it to become steadily more difficult to actually attain.
 
Please sir, I want some more.

If I thought Apple was going to leave that money in the bank for the benefit of the US citizens I would agree with your disagreement.

Do the basic elements of an economic system allow for loans to the unemployed?

I would like to see Apple open a manufacturing plant here in the US. Keep the oversees plants going, but offer a choice to customers. I would pay more for something that said "Made in the USA" if the quality was just as good. Doubtful it would be I suppose.


B






$100B in the bank means $100B more that banks can loan out to people starting businesses, buying houses and cars, and other things, which all means more job growth and more tax income for the government. Do you think banks give out interest because of magic? Banks are profit-making enterprises, using your money to make more money, then they give you back a cut.

Don't argue about economics if you are so ignorant of the basic elements of an economic system.
 
I just have to know - was LTD counted or not in this tally?

Kidding.. sincerely...

----------



Now you're just twisting what I said out of some emotional response you're having.

I never said they didn't create jobs. Nor did I say they didn't create any job. And you have no idea what I can and can't admit to. Take a deep breath and try not to get so heated about something that really shouldn't be "personal" to you.

Personal? Hardly. You can spin your words all you like, but you claimed Apple was wrong for claiming to create those jobs.
 
a) you didn't PAY to get hired, did you? What you're describing is different altogether. IF Apple is counting everyone that has paid to be a developer as an "employee" (a job they created) it's incredibly dubious. They can call them customers - not employees.

I paid to get my diplomas, and I wouldn't have been hired without them. I also didn't need to go to school to learn what I did. I could have done it myself. The only thing I got out of my schooling at the University level was expensive pieces of paper.

Oh, and I should add, I also only got those diplomas because when I inquired how to get a job at the University, they told me I needed a few diplomas. So I paid to get the diplomas needed to get my job at the University which then hired me (created my job).
 
Last edited:
Nein. Aldi ist ein deutsche Firma.

Aldi's founder is the brother of the owner of Trader Joe's. Well, technically they took over their mother's grocery store, kept expanding and eventually split the company in half.
Oh I know. It is hard to miss when you see where some of the products are imported from or the Medion computers for sale on rare occasion.
 
$100B in the bank means $100B more that banks can loan out to people starting businesses, buying houses and cars, and other things, which all means more job growth and more tax income for the government. Do you think banks give out interest because of magic? Banks are profit-making enterprises, using your money to make more money, then they give you back a cut.

Don't argue about economics if you are so ignorant of the basic elements of an economic system.

If it was not in the bank where would it be?

Possibly in the hands of consumers, workers, etc. if they paid less for the products or paid the workers more.
 
PR....

First - App developers have to PAY to get into the program. When was the last time you paid for a job? Not to mention - most developers aren't really developing apps as a job. Many are - or trying. But most are hobbyists (of that 200k+ figure)

Second - How come people are OK lumping in employees of Samsung, UPS, FEDEx, etc with THESE numbers - but when FoxConn is under the microscope everyone points out that those employees are NOT Apple employees but FoxConns.

Can't have it both ways. I'm not saying Apple doesn't have influence and hasn't supported jobs. But this is such blatant PR "crap" that it makes my eyes want to bleed.

You're mistaken. This is definitely a PR message but cannot be attributed as crap.

There are companies of more than 10-15 people (per company now developing apps for iOS/Mac OS X). You're only taking into account some 300k-500k developers whom Apple have sold iOS Developer license to. Apple is not counting all of those people. There are hundreds of companies and some companies employ more than 50-60 to develop high grossing games on the app store. If not 200k, Apple has generated well more than a 100k jobs in the US alone.
 
that's why

256px-Outsourcing.jpg
 
I believe it wouldn't be feasible due to higher labor and production costs. It'd have been worse.

Build in US and keep costs the same or lower than present Foxconn builds by Using the Obscene cash reserves apple has :D
 
Last edited:
More pr bs from Tim Cook's apple...

How about to get foxconn to reduce working hours (from about 12-14 a day) to something more akin to humans instead of human slaves Tim? We know you are not much of a visionary, so about being decent instead?

I get so tired of comments like these. You think working 8-5 or less is how you do better for yourself? I work from 8AM to at least midnight most days of the week. Millions of others do too. People are acting like it's some sort of human rights violation for a 15yo to work a 12hr day. Give me a ****ing break.
 
Obviously not enough people give a damn about whether Americans have jobs, hence why companies like Apple are seeing record profits/growth each year.

The chinese have set the standard of salary expected for that kind of factory work. So if you don't want to accept that standard, either retrain or get prepared to live in a tent.
 
That's not splitting hairs. It's being factual. "Sorry" if I'm not buying into the Apple PR machine on their loose idea of "job creation." Feel free to buy into it as much as you want.

As a PR/Marketing professional for over 20 years - I can not only read between the lines - but spot spin a mile away.

So? I don't want to put words in anyone's mouth. So, my question to you and others once again ragging on Apple, MR, anyone nearby is....

So? What's your point?
 
There are a lot of people who don't seem to understand the difference between paying for a job (that's counted as much) and paying for a license.

None of the associations claim they've created jobs. They claim they have certified x amount of doctors. That's different. That's my point.

When you pay for education - the school doesn't take credit for how many jobs it's created counting all the students that have graduated. So again - it's different.

Poor analogies/examples.
 
$10/day earns you more money than half of the world's population, that's over 3 billion people.

Maybe so, but I'm not talking about myself relative to the world, I'm talking about myself relative to other US citizens. Before anyone brings up me being close minded or something, keep in mind that Apple is advertising how many US jobs they have, not worldwide.

Minimum wage in the US is $7 an hour. I make $10/day programming, or $70 a week. Thus it's the equivalent of working a minimum wage job 10 hours a week. To be equal to a full time minimum wage job, I'd need to be making at least 3 times as much as I do. Not up to a minimum wage, full time job means I'm unemployed by most standards, I think.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.