Uspto...
Did any of you even bother to check this info on the United States Patent and Trademark Office website? A "Mac Pro" trademark already exists since January 2001 (other have existed before but this is the current). And no it's not Apple. I can't link to the actual entry as their site doesn't allow that. But it's filled under registration #2442447 to a Make-Up Art Cosmetics Limited CORPORATION CANADA 233 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario CANADA. Yes that is MAC cosmetics... Yes yes I know Macintoshes are pretty, but it has nothing to do with it. If I'm right this a fairly big cosmetic company. Not that I know anything about cosmetics but I recall hearing ladies talk about it. Definitely not the kind of company that would let go a trade mark they are, probably, using. ianal but this doesn't look good... or maybe it does if you're like most normal people and don't like the MacBook Pro naming and alike.
Did any of you even bother to check this info on the United States Patent and Trademark Office website? A "Mac Pro" trademark already exists since January 2001 (other have existed before but this is the current). And no it's not Apple. I can't link to the actual entry as their site doesn't allow that. But it's filled under registration #2442447 to a Make-Up Art Cosmetics Limited CORPORATION CANADA 233 Carlton Street Toronto, Ontario CANADA. Yes that is MAC cosmetics... Yes yes I know Macintoshes are pretty, but it has nothing to do with it. If I'm right this a fairly big cosmetic company. Not that I know anything about cosmetics but I recall hearing ladies talk about it. Definitely not the kind of company that would let go a trade mark they are, probably, using. ianal but this doesn't look good... or maybe it does if you're like most normal people and don't like the MacBook Pro naming and alike.