I mean they give away 3+ month trials like they are candy, so not surprised 1. people aren't sticking around and 2. surprised they are making any money on it.
Maybe making stuff people want to watch while also stopping overspending on Hollywood cliché shows will bring some viewers to platform.
Why should i waste time of some boring Morning Show while I can watch House of Dragons or other top tier TV show for less money.
*(Maybe just buy HBO for this billions that were spend on crappy Apple shows to capture some viewer-base and let them <HBO> create shows for you was the move. Right now there are like 3/4 TV shows worth watching on Apple TV why should people waste time on boring, repetitive and copy-paste titles?)
They are still stuck with that Covid mindset with huge budgets because "no matter what it will make a billion dollars." People aren't stuck at home and with the prices of everything, people have switched their habits.You really don’t need a huge budget to make something entertaining…
The whole industry needs a major realignment.
Tim Cook decided to get Apple into Hollywood just as people stopped watching that stuff in favor of YouTube. It was a bad move, and it’s good that he’s decided to start cutting back on the amount of investor money he’s wasting.
original content is great but honestly if they want to bring in eyeballs they should just buy a franchise like Disney did with Marvel and Star Wars. Or just buy Disney all together. I mean they could get controlling interest in Disney with a hostile takeover for like 90 billion and they already pissed away 20 billion on content people didn't really care about
original content is great but honestly if they want to bring in eyeballs they should just buy a franchise like Disney did with Marvel and Star Wars. Or just buy Disney all together. I mean they could get controlling interest in Disney with a hostile takeover for like 90 billion and they already pissed away 20 billion on content people didn't really care about
The shame of it is… Netflix content is mostly garbage. It’s a firehose of reality and true crime junk. But I guess that’s what people want. Apple on the other hand has a lot of really great original shows. I think the problem is they also have a lot of stinkers and they spend just as much money on the stinkers (i.e. ridiculous sums) as they do on the good shows.
My test is this: “Would Apple publish ____ (any show you can think of: Breaking Bad, Entourage, etc). Even though Apple’s shows can be profane, their brand’s value and guidelines put them in a box.
Plus the product placement is a bit overkill. Do we really believe Rusty Sabizch has a HomePod?
The problem is that they don't have any sort of back catalog of older movies & shows. not everyone wants to watch "new" stuff all the time. I myself love watching old movies, especially before all the CGI stuff. Can't do that on ATV+.
Apple should have considered to buy one of these studios that have merged with others in the past many years.
I don't think regulators would allow a Apple and Disney merger to go through, nor should they. Absolutely not in favor of bigger and more power companies, regardless of how they behave.
Yes. I use Tubi, FreeVee and Roku’s live TV option to watch older TV shows. I don’t know what’s all available but back catalog stuff could be used to draw people in to new stuff. One reason I signed up for Netflix years ago is because it had The West Wing (now it’s on Max).The problem is that they don't have any sort of back catalog of older movies & shows. not everyone wants to watch "new" stuff all the time. I myself love watching old movies, especially before all the CGI stuff. Can't do that on ATV+.
Apple should have considered to buy one of these studios that have merged with others in the past many years.
They allowed Comcast to buy NBC, they allowed AT&T to re-form into the evil empire, they allow so much. I don't know why they even require regulatory approval anymore.
But yes, I wouldn't put it past them to decide this is where to draw the line.
Which is why you’d think he would be pushing sports. Nothing to worry about content wise there.That 20 billion could’ve gone to NFL and Premier League and they would’ve been uber successful. Of course we are talking about PC heavy Tim Cook overseeing this.
I was about to comment on the same thing. Whenever I tell someone to check out a show (mostly I'm recommending Foundation and For All Mankind) they ask where they can watch them, I say they're on Apple TV and they're like.. oh I don't have one of those thinking its a physical box.The NAME of this streaming service is the main problem. Anyone I talk to thinks you need an Apple device to watch these shows. The lack of content is second to me. They have had hits like Ted Lasso but most people I know who have watched Ted Lasso have pirated it as they don't think they can get Apple TV+.
If they would have named it anything else it would have taken off better. It wouldn't have been in the big leagues, but it would have helped. Same situation with Nintendo when they named their new system the 'Wii U'. Everyone thought it was just an add-on to the Wii, not a brand new next-generation console.