Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
If you don't want to pay for baseball, they don't care if you like it or not.

I am paying for baseball though. I’m paying MLB directly, not to mention I paid more this year than last year. I should have access to baseball, at least the Apple TV and peacock games.

The issue isn’t just the RSNs. It’s the fragmentation with their exclusivities.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kostthem
NFL Sunday Ticket is- I believe- the MOST expensive of the streaming offerings... and it has blackouts too.

Those ad-sponsered NFL games you watch have ad-sponsered MLB game equivalents. In fact, there are MORE baseball games because baseball is played on many more days & nights than NFL... over a longer season too. If you have cable/satt or cable-equivalent streaming services, you'll probably drown in "included" baseball games if you seek them out. Watch on FOX, FS1, TBS, ESPN, and MLB Network this year.

I don't know where you live, but there is abundant baseball on television even if you are a cord cutter and have only an antenna for the local networks (FOX). If you dodge the free TV via antenna too, there are sports bars and friends/family homes where you can similarly sample baseball games for free to then decide if you want to watch one in person. Or come on down to Florida or Arizona this time of year and watch MLB for relatively dirt cheap in spring training games.

I'm not really defending their choices as I'm a consumer first(!) thinker (too). However, it's easy to understand WHY they- and all sellers- make decisions that seem anti-consumer. Why? Because the bulk of us just roll over and pay. While you appear to be finding the ability to say "NO" to this, others will just accept it and pay. Apple will take their (presumably) fat cut, MLB will enjoy their new revenue stream, the person/people who forged this deal will probably earn their bonuses, MLB will make more money, Owners will enjoy added profit, etc. EVERYONE in the selling chain WINS because buyers just accept whatever is offered and vote positively for it with their wallets.

Alls I know is, I can watch my local football team every Sunday no problem with just a live tv subscription, no sunday ticket.

Every time I see a game for the local baseball team it says it’s available on mlb but not in my region.

So I just shrug and watch football and reaffirm my opinion that I really don’t care about baseball. If that’s what they wanted, then mission accomplished.
 
  • Like
Reactions: gusmula
Paying for an MLB.TV subscription is looking less and less attractive, even as an out of market fan. ESPN+ is fantastic with most NHL games and that model is what MLB should mimic, even though MLB basically runs NHL streaming media through MLBAM.
 
I watched the broadcasts last year for my team the Blue Jays, and the commentary and analysis was so robotic... These people don't have a clue about the inner workings of the team as the local team broadcaster.

The good news is that we'll have a choice between the "National" commentators and the local radio broadcast!

Fans in the U.S. and Canada1 will also have the option to listen to the audio of the home and away teams’ local radio broadcasts during “Friday Night Baseball” games.

  1. Radio broadcasts for the Texas Rangers are available only for the team’s home games. In Canada, radio broadcasts are available only for Toronto Blue Jays games.
 
Haha, no thanks. Baseball is a regional sport now... I watched the broadcasts last year for my team the Blue Jays, and the commentary and analysis was so robotic... These people don't have a clue about the inner workings of the team as the local team broadcaster.

They expect me to pay $69 to watch 4-6 games of my team per season? That's as much as it costs me to pay for the sports streaming service of my home team's broadcaster for the full baseball season.

Sorry, the value is not there. I'll listen on the radio for those games.
This would be little different than if Netflix decided to carry sports games.

You just need a subscription to the service, it’s not extra if you already have Apple TV+.
 
  • Like
Reactions: compwiz1202
I will tune in. Hopefully, they have better announcers this time around. Outside of that, I really enjoyed the 4K picture.
I like baseball and I was psyched for those broadcasts last year. The announcing just didn’t work for me. I watched it with the sound off. 🫤
 
  • Like
Reactions: KaliYoni
I have zero interest in this and am not happy that I have to pay for the expensive license with my ATV+ subscription frees. Probably one of the reasons why they recently raised the price. Apple should make sports a separate channel subscription.
 
I am paying for baseball though. I’m paying MLB directly, not to mention I paid more this year than last year. I should have access to baseball, at least the Apple TV and peacock games.

The issue isn’t just the RSNs. It’s the fragmentation with their exclusivities.

Don't make the case to a fellow consumer. Make the case to them.

I'm not arguing their choices are right. I'm with you in wanting maximum value for my money as a consumer too.

They get it their way because most of us just allow sellers to do whatever they want to do... and we pay them anyway. Some of us will even rationalize higher prices to each other with words like "inflation" and "supply chain" etc.

You choosing to pay for MLB directly is directly rewarding them for whatever choices they make. You choosing to pay more this year than last year is further rewarding them for the choices they make. Those rewards are the most tangible measuring stick they use to decide if their new higher prices were accepted or rejected by the market. They can't even hear us whining about getting less for our money if we pay them more than last year anyway.

Let them know how you feel and expect nothing to change. Let fellow consumers know how you feel and they can't do anything about this either.

Or vote with your wallet and hope many others do too so that perhaps sellers do notice and care (about the monetary loss) enough to deliver more value for the money. That's the ONLY remedy for ALL of this kind of thing.

Big Bonus: by the masses demonstrating they value the money MORE than the diminishing product offerings, we also resolve the entire inflation issue too. Nothing halts price hikes faster than the market choosing to no longer pay. Nothing deflates inflated prices faster than little-to-no buyers at those higher prices.
 
Last edited:
They expect me to pay $69 to watch 4-6 games of my team per season? That's as much as it costs me to pay for the sports streaming service of my home team's broadcaster for the full baseball season.
I don't know which is worse, your erroneous statement or that at least 10 people gave a thumbs up to this incorrect statement. Let me quote from the initial MR post:

"While the games were free to watch last season, an Apple TV+ subscription is now required, with U.S. pricing set at $6.99 per month or $69 per year."

You aren't paying $6.99 a month for just FNB. It's for all of Apple TV+, which includes Friday Night Baseball. And the Apple hate just keeps on growing, clearly based on ignorance of facts.
 
  • Like
Reactions: burgman
Because we are already paying high premium prices for Apple Products. The prices also seems to go up every year too.
I don't know about your expenses, but all of mine are going up. Groceries are up. My gas bill is up. My insurances are all costing me more. The pet food I buy is more expensive. And on and on and on.

It seems you are suggesting that once a price reaches what you determine is a maximum price, then there shouldn't be any further increases, and if there are, then you are entitled to get something for free because of it. That may be how the economy works on Pluto, but not here on Earth.
 
Haha, no thanks. Baseball is a regional sport now... I watched the broadcasts last year for my team the Blue Jays, and the commentary and analysis was so robotic... These people don't have a clue about the inner workings of the team as the local team broadcaster.

They expect me to pay $69 to watch 4-6 games of my team per season? That's as much as it costs me to pay for the sports streaming service of my home team's broadcaster for the full baseball season.

Sorry, the value is not there. I'll listen on the radio for those games.
Unfortunately pro teams are moving to corporate/network based broadcasting. At least hockey you don't have to listen to countless ridiculous/meaningless stats and empty dribble.
 
I hope their daily wrap-up show is better than last year. They have a weekly MLS wrap-up that gives me some hope. Last year, you had one clip of a woman saying "Welcome to..." at the beginning and a clip of her saying "Thank you for watching..." at the end and nothing but clips in between (same clip every show). No presenter telling you which game was about to be recapped and nothing at the end of a games highlights to give you the final score - so you could go right from a "last out strikeout" to the start of another game and not even realize who won the game you were just watching. It was *awful*. I mean, it was worse than nothing!

MLB Network does a great job with their "Quick Pitch" show and I'm really hoping that Apple puts some effort into THEIR wrap-up show. At least the new MLS show demonstrates they CAN do better.
 
I don't know about your expenses, but all of mine are going up. Groceries are up. My gas bill is up. My insurances are all costing me more. The pet food I buy is more expensive. And on and on and on.

It seems you are suggesting that once a price reaches what you determine is a maximum price, then there shouldn't be any further increases, and if there are, then you are entitled to get something for free because of it. That may be how the economy works on Pluto, but not here on Earth.
Agreed with prices going up all the way. I’ve stopped buying too many groceries, no longer use gas, adjusted insurance services, and pet is not eating as much- food cut in half.

Back to the topic… This seems to be a subscription-based model now. It would have been nice if it was complimentary with Apple TV+. However, in that case, I’m moving to Pluto. 👩🏻‍🚀
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: svish and ratspg
Agreed with prices going up all the way. I’ve stopped buying too many groceries, no longer use gas, adjusted insurance services, and pet is not eating as much- food cut in half.

Back to the topic… This seems to be a subscription-based model now. It would have been nice if it was complimentary with Apple TV+. However, in that case, I’m moving to Pluto. 👩🏻‍🚀
When did they raise Apple TV+ to $6.99? lol in my brain its still $4.99.... I have Apple One Premier anyways LOL
 
When did they raise Apple TV+ to $6.99? lol in my brain its still $4.99.... I have Apple One Premier anyways LOL
Right! I thought prices will remain the same or be lowered but that does not seem to be the case. I really thought Tim Cook taking a pay cut this year would have helped us (Loyal Consumers) However, that does not seem to be the case. Maybe the solar electric bill is too high at Apple Park in Cupertino, California.


 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.