Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
??? Actually, those first versions of Windows were the only ones with names based on the version number.

Although, I can't make out what either of you are saying.

Egad. No sense of humor around here at all. I'm not 'saying' anything, just making a jab at the wording of a previous poster's wording (i.e. Windows7 took 7 years to get right, which is silly sounding when OSX has been at that 'version' for 10+ years. Now do some of you get it? Ragging on Windows7 (based on 'vista' which is only 5 years old by release date, although obviously started earlier internally (i.e. the 7 year old date makes no sense to begin with) and it's really based on NT which is 18 years old) when OSX is older (released for 10+ years and based on NeXT Step (NOT OS9) which is MUCH older (1985) than Windows period and that's based on Unix which is literally ancient in the tech world (1969). So no matter how you look at it, a comment that makes fun of Windows7' age versus OSX is ironic/funny/silly. That's the joke I saw. How silly of me to think people would 'get it'. :rolleyes:
 
v3: Windows 3.x, Windows NT 3.1
v4: Windows 95 (4.0.x), Windows NT 4 (also 4.0.x), Windows 98 (4.1.x), Windows ME (4.9)
NT is a different OS. And, ME is more unlike 95 than 7 is unlike Vista.

As far as the leather goes... it's horrid. Only one person here likes it. Everyone else should complain to Apple.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.