This is what I am excited about along with the iPhone 17 Air phone that most likely will have this C1 chip inside of it - only way Apple can produce a thin phone like that while having similar cellular connectivity options for users, IMHO.
Dude - think about if this future were to come to fruition:When that arrives, I'll bet it will be eSIM only option on Mac lineups. Not a bad thing, just my wild guess.
Why do you need a 5G modem in a watch?I wonder if / when we'll see this in cellular Apple Watches. Lord knows those need all the help they can get when it comes to efficiency.
Slower compare to what??it’s more power efficient but possibly also slower?
Likely the MacBook Air and Pro, but I doubt it will in be this year or next, probably might be 2028 or 2029 if it does happen. Can’t see it coming to any of the desktops.Here we go!! This is definitely making it's way to the Mac....I am sure of it!! Can't wait when it happens!!
Makes no sense for the desktops, for sure.Likely the MacBook Air and Pro, but I doubt it will in be this year or next, probably might be 2028 or 2029 if it does happen. Can’t see it coming to any of the desktops.
Right, I never realised competitors shipped faster chips than Apple M series. I thought Apple was the single-threaded king, with very few exceptions…A lot of people don’t realise that the M chips are the same. Performance per Watt is excellent but raw performance has always been beaten by competitors. For most people it makes no difference and battery life is probably more useful and probably the same here.
Source for this?Unlikely to happen. Apple has said they will pay for the few parts of the modem that use something close to Qualcomm technology. This means Apple will pay a lot lower licensing fee than now.
So you’re still on an Intel chip Mac too?ill stick with the proven chips thank you
Yes the SE crowd don’t care about modem performance and will be more interested in the battery 🔋 lifeA lot of people don’t realise that the M chips are the same. Performance per Watt is excellent but raw performance has always been beaten by competitors. For most people it makes no difference and battery life is probably more useful and probably the same here.
Speed improvements are much more important on cellular than many initially think.Because Gigabit cellular speeds with Qualcomm modem isn't fast enough for your phone? I have no idea what anyone needs faster than Gigabit over cellular for other than gloating. Keep in mind apart from Speedtests, real speed depends on BOTH ENDS supporting super-fast >Gigabit speeds.
With that philosophy we'd never see any improvementsThe device it replaces didn’t have mag safe.
Probably on par with the Snapdragon X70, but not the current Snapdragon X80 used on the Samsung Galaxy S25 models.We shall see how it stacks up against Qualcomm modems.
It will definitely be interesting to see.Probably on par with the Snapdragon X70, but not the current Snapdragon X80 used on the Samsung Galaxy S25 models.