Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is what I am excited about along with the iPhone 17 Air phone that most likely will have this C1 chip inside of it - only way Apple can produce a thin phone like that while having similar cellular connectivity options for users, IMHO.
 
When that arrives, I'll bet it will be eSIM only option on Mac lineups. Not a bad thing, just my wild guess.
Dude - think about if this future were to come to fruition:
  • We already know that Apple is working on releasing the next-gen MacBook Pros with OLED displays
  • add to it the possibility that Apple removes the notch
  • ...and then add the C1 cellular chip to it as well?!??!?!
If all 3 of these things were to pass in the next-gen MacBook Pro release???? I will be quickly trading in my M1 Pro MacBook Pro for it in a heartbeat!!!
 
A lot of people don’t realise that the M chips are the same. Performance per Watt is excellent but raw performance has always been beaten by competitors. For most people it makes no difference and battery life is probably more useful and probably the same here.
Right, I never realised competitors shipped faster chips than Apple M series. I thought Apple was the single-threaded king, with very few exceptions…
 
I’ll be checking out the review just for new cellular modem. If it functions the same, or better, I’d like to see it.
 
I'm fully assuming when they roll this out in their normal/Pro phones it will have mmWave

I'm also glad for Apple to roll this ou tin this phone to work the bugs out before a brand new phone launch.

What's the latest on what's going in the 17/17 Pro, Apple or Qualcomm?
 
  • Like
Reactions: bumblebritches5
A lot of people don’t realise that the M chips are the same. Performance per Watt is excellent but raw performance has always been beaten by competitors. For most people it makes no difference and battery life is probably more useful and probably the same here.
Yes the SE crowd don’t care about modem performance and will be more interested in the battery 🔋 life
 
Because Gigabit cellular speeds with Qualcomm modem isn't fast enough for your phone? I have no idea what anyone needs faster than Gigabit over cellular for other than gloating. Keep in mind apart from Speedtests, real speed depends on BOTH ENDS supporting super-fast >Gigabit speeds.
Speed improvements are much more important on cellular than many initially think.

The faster the cellular connection then the faster things like images and other large assets download. For the end user that means the web page or app appears more responsive which is good, but for everyone else it means their phone is taking up less "airtime" than it otherwise would (taking up hypothetically 15 seconds versus 60 or 90 seconds or something). The less airtime a device occupies the less congested towers are and the better the entire network operates for everyone.
 
I wonder if there are any stories of them beta testing this modem with older iPhone employee devices.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.