I understand your point clearly...
YOU want Apple to impliment Bluray into its systems so that YOU can play your Bluray discs on you laptop.
What YOU don't understand from ME is that Apple have no reason and no need to implement Bluray into its systems.
Yes they do, they have customers who want it, like me. They are a business. They can promote iTunes downloads without snubbing those customers who want Blu-ray support. If they truly believe downloads are already the better option they should let their customers decide that on the merits of the formats, shouldn't they, instead of metaphorically crying and taking their ball home.
Will the world end without Blu-ray support? No, I'd just like it, and it discourages me from buying a new mac. Adding Blu-ray support
as an option, just like they've given CD-ROM / CD-RW, DVD-ROM / DVD-RW options on machines for years and years wouldn't kill them or their lofty download ambitions.
Apple already have a successful and working system of distributing media of the likes of music, video, podcasts to its customers through iTunes. I understand that by rejecting Bluray is doesn't give much option to people who have Bluray discs already and want to watch them on their Macs, but what YOU don't seem to understand is that Apple are not interested in physical media and see more potential for itself as a company and for its customers as a distributer of downloadable media.
Films on SD? No my friend. Most of my films are on DVD or have been downloaded onto the hard drive of my MacBook to then pass onto my iPhone if need be. I have many films such as Rain Man, 50 First Dates and Shawshank Redemption on standard DVD which I am happy to watch on my MacBook as they don't 1080p quality to appreciate. I bought a Bluray player and 42" LCD to recreate the cinema experience with surround sound etc. If I want to watch 1080p movies, I purchase Bluray DVD's worth purchasing and watching in 1080p on my 42" LCD eg. 300, Transformers etc.
As someone else recognised, I mean SD as in Standard Definition, not SD as in Secure Digital card. My bad, I should have been clearer, but I thought the context of your question about watching HD made it clear enough.
The situation is very similar to XBox's HD-DVD drive. Bluray won that battle and XBox has now ditched HD-DVD. But what is interesting is that Microsoft didn't then decide to include a Bluray device into its system but instead concentrate on downloadable media through its Marketplace and Zune.
That would be a reasonable example if it weren't for the fact that Microsoft, who as you say are also selling movie downloads, also support Blu-ray playback through their OS.
"'is its successor mature enough to take over yet?' You seem to think it is, I disagree."
I have never said that it's successor is mature enough. My point is that Apple is working on its "future" successor but you can't just expect a company to click its fingers in 2011 and have 1080p HD content available to the masses. Apple needs to nurture it's format, build a structure and understanding with it's customers. With the way iTunes, Apple TV etc. are going it looks like a very well structured and organised format to me once that first full 1080p movie does become available as a legal download.
I still don't think you know what I'm getting at here though. Apple sees downloaded media as the best way to progress with distributing its content. iTunes is very much what makes Apple tick. Without iTunes and iPod, Apple would not be in the position that they are in today... so why shouldn't they take advantage of this and use iTunes as its base for its customers to access media content?
I'm not stopping them! I completely understand your and their position. I just what the OPTION for playing back Blu-ray discs. Seeing as I'm not going to be touching iTunes downloads with a barge-pole it should make no difference to you or Apple. I'm willing to pay the extra! It feels like they're just being lazy and spiteful because things aren't progressing as fast as they like with downloads. Apple have their vision, I know. But they compromise on it in loads of areas when the demand is strong enough. Otherwise you couldn't run Firefox, or USB would have ever replaced Firewire in iPods, etc etc.
Also if Apple are so opposed to Blu-ray they should stop being hypocrites and resign from the Blu-ray Disc Association board. Right now they just look silly.
The death of discs? You say 7 years, I say 3... The internet has grown rapidly since 2003. I had 512kbps broadband then and now I have 50mbps with companies increasing speeds year on year. Japan's has 1gbps for crying out loud. You really think it'll take 7 years for internet speeds to be sufficient enough to stream or download 1080p HD movies? That long?
Lucky you. Not everyone has 50mbps. The average in the UK is something like 3.5Mbps, which is naturally distorted by the lucky ones such as yourself having speeds up to 50Mbps. It doesn't even matter, because even IF everyone had 50Mbps tomorrow, Blu-ray would have a decent run as a niche format for people who just plain prefer it over what iTunes offers.
7 years is a very rough guess, I don't know. Japan is an extreme example, with high population density (though the UK surely should be far ahead on that compared to the US for obvious reasons). I hope it's much sooner, I just don't have any confidence at all in it happening fast enough to make Blu-ray irrelevant. Especially not so long as it's not in BT's interests to provide all their competitors with an infrastructure. Even their ADSL2+ plans only really improve connections for people who already have the fastest ones. There will be huge numbers of people left with slow connections for years to come yet, IMHO.
I think it's a point worth repeating, that while CDs still sell it's not credible to say discs for movies are near being dead. I can download music all I want (and do download music), but I actually choose the CD over the download quite often still, because of quality, price or their collectible nature.
These are your options
1. Stick to watching the 70+ BD discs that you willingly purchased; without really fully understanding the format that you've banked on, at home on your Bluray player + LCD.
Again, So patronising. I fully understand the Blu-ray format and personally already have my money's worth in enjoyment from it. I just want Apple to support it to give me even more value.
2. Purchase a Windows PC with a Bluray disc to watch your 70+ BD disc movies on its screen until it crashes on you half way through.
I don't like Windows any more than you do by the sound of it. I would really rather not have to use a Windows machine, and I'm not going to buy one just for Blu-ray support. I think Apple knows this, which sucks a bit really.
3. Move out of your area into a more developed town or city with 8mbps+ broadband speeds.
I actually might move soon, but it'd be a ridiculous suggestion to imply someone should move house because Apple won't support Blu-ray wouldn't it? And even IF I had the speed, to be honest I'd still be preferring Blu-ray to what iTunes currently offers. And being slightly geeky, access to to decent internet speeds WILL be a consideration when I look at places, but I'm not sure the average film fan would be doing that.
What we both seem to agree with is that downloadable content is the future. Apple are working on the best way to distribute downloadable content as of now. Let them do their work and you shall be happy once it's perfected.
Well, IF it's perfected. I rather suspect the restrictions of downloads will continue to be far more annoying than those on disks ever were... but sure, assuming that one day in the future Apple get it all perfect great, they can not offer Blu-ray support THEN, not NOW. In terms of mass-adoption, Downloads are still the FUTURE, Blu-Ray is the PRESENT!
You still never told me what you'd do if you had a Blu-ray you wanted to finish watching on your mac. Buy it again? Buy and install Windows and buy an external drive just for that?
I thought many/most Blue-Ray discs were coming with digital copies for download onto your computer anyway. Seems like a simpler solution than lugging the discs around, anyway. Even if not, it's not that big of a deal to buy an external Blue Ray disc and rip the movie and save it your HDD. Do you really carry an armful of Blue Rays around with you in case you feel the need to watch one?
The vast majority of Blu-ray (no 'e') discs here in the UK don't have 'digital copies' or DVDs included. I have over 70 titles now, and I think I have three, and they discs are US imports meaning I can't use them anyway! Ironically (given Steve Jobs' er, jobs), Disney are the best at including a DVD copy with the BD, which is fine and if they all did that it would go some way to alleviating the problem.
I started watching a BD at home the other day, it'd be nice to have been able to take it with me to finish, that's all.
There are two main reasons why people want to watch BD (it's "BD", not "BR") movies...
- They already own the BD movies for their home big screen, and want to be able to watch the same discs on the go. They don't want to have to buy a lower quality DVD, or buy a much, much lower quality download. They paid once.
- The 2 MPixel 1080p BD image downscaled to the laptop screen will be much sharper and clearer than the 300KPixel DVD movie upscaled to a laptop screen.
Yes. Quoted for truth, as they say.
Apologies to all for a semi-thread de-rail, but I think it's a discussion worth having, especially while people still don't get why those who would like Bu-ray support would like it. We have discs we know the mac is powerful enough to play, so we want Apple to give us the
option. I don't think that is unreasonable.