Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I HATE that the Mac App store still doesn't let you download old versions of apps.

Things that downloaded fine on 10.6, 10.7, 10.8, etc now refuse to download/install, because they now "Require a newer version of OS X."

On of my MacBook Pro systems goes up to 10.7.

Some of our older systems (32-bit Core Duo) and ones required to run certain PowerPC apps can only go up to 10.6. I used Twitter on one to send outage notices, and it was updated and dropped 10.6 support a long time ago.

I can load old iWork '09 and iLife '11 apps from disc, but I cannot get much of the other software I use to be able to get.

Interesting. I was able to download old versions of iApps when I went back to Mountain Lion.
 
Hope they take their time with it and not make it half-assed like 90% of their current software is

not gonna disagree with that but am quite anxious to know if i have to look outside of apple for my photomanaging needs
 
I hope Apple continues to make Aperture compatible with OS X going forward. Even if they don't add any new features.

I have all my photos since 2005 in Aperture. Over 30,000 of them, most of them in RAW format.

Does Apple really expect us to upload all our photos to the cloud? That would be insane.

I sure as hell hope the "Photos" app has a local storage option, with backups. Ideally you'd be able to then choose a subset of your photos to put on the cloud if you wish. That would be the right way to do it.

Their keeping us in the dark about how the Photos app will work is frustrating. The least they could do is explain how it all works, especially storage management and backups, so we can stop worrying and just look forward to it.

I am waiting on the Photos App from Apple....and wishing they'd offer more info on it.
I have at least the same amount of Photos and probably a good several thousand RAW files too held within Aperture.

I believe I read on the Apple.com site a few months back that we don't HAVE to put our images on the Cloud. BUT it might not be easy to distinguish which ones go there. I would LOVE a rating system (like current with 1-5 STARS) then to say onlyupload 4 & 5 STARRED images to the cloud.

I am thinking after using the new Photos Editing on the iPhone that the Photos for Mac will be similar. You can do "Smart Edit" and it'll do it all for you; you can do Quick edits (a la iPhoto) and simply hit how much color boost you want based on easy filters; OR you can adjust deeper into manual controls.
PLUS, I think they will let App developers create plugins that we can Buy from the App Store to adjust further and deeper. Allow Pixelmator (and any others on the App Store) to be able to edit our images within Photos using their add-ons.

I think the new Photos will be robust as-is but fully customizable based on how much you'd want to buy on the App Store as Plugins.


again, that's a lot of my HOPES.

I am sticking with Aperture until I find out otherwise if Photos cannot work (or will work and switch to that and hopefully all edits/adjustments flow into it). Jumping ship to Lightroom now means either losing non-destructive edits or starting all over.
 
I can't update any app :mad:#

Screen%20Shot%202014-10-17%20at%2016.28.44.png
 
Why is the article calling them 'compatibility updates'. They are clearly 'incompatibility updates' since they won't work in Mavericks

Are you serious?

Obviously, you don't need to apply these updates for Mavericks compatibility. The prior versions were already compatible with Mavericks. The updates are for compatibility with Yosemite.
 
Are you serious?

Obviously, you don't need to apply these updates for Mavericks compatibility. The prior versions were already compatible with Mavericks. The updates are for compatibility with Yosemite.

No, they are not 'for compatibility with Yosemite'. Especially in the case of Aperture that's just a smokescreen. They are for breaking compatibility with Mavericks. Of course I don't have to update them yet, but how long before something comes along to force our hands, like iCloud suddenly not supporting older versions? I give it three months.
 
I thought iPhoto was going to die yesterday with 10.10 coming out.

Was super curious to get the Photo app.

It's only a "compatibility" update that changes some version numbers. Other than that, it's on life-support until the new Photos app is released.
 
Is this the first version of GarageBand 10 that allows AU effects on a per track track basis (like previous versions of GarageBand)? It seems like this was gone in the initial release of GarageBand 10. It is a no-brainer that the feature has been brought back. It should never have been removed in the first place!
 
I wonder when Xcode and Apple Remote Desktop will be updated?

I expect Xcode 6.1 to land on Monday alongside iOS 8.1 final. Never understood how Xcode 6.1 can be a Golden Master released to the devs, but it carries an iOS Simulator with iOS 8.1 Beta 2. I hope more changes will be made in 6.1, because the SourceKitService is crashing a lot when writing Swift.
 
No, they are not 'for compatibility with Yosemite'. Especially in the case of Aperture that's just a smokescreen. They are for breaking compatibility with Mavericks. Of course I don't have to update them yet, but how long before something comes along to force our hands, like iCloud suddenly not supporting older versions? I give it three months.

Here's your hat (and one for your cat):

th


;)
 
Considering they're selling subscription services for online storage now, yes, I imagine they want all your data on iCloud no matter how big it is.
"Have you considered our terrabyte plan?"

(as someone with a 200gb iTunes library and 20k iPhoto files)

When iCloud first started music and photos didn't count toward your storage plan. Is that still the case?
 
Excuse me hater but I believe you are in the wrong thread. Please take your ignorant hate comment to the nearest hater thread or Anti-apple forum.

Oh no, brain-washed Applezombies approaching! #

Seriously though, given Apple's recent track record of software updates (starting with Lion and FCPX), one is naturally hesitant if not outright negative about new developments. Especially when it comes to crucial software, like an Aperture replacement in this case.
 
I was hoping with the release of Yosemite they would finally revamp the Mac App Store and make it more functional and remove some of those stupid policies which makes dev's not wanting to submit their app to it unless they want to drop a bunch of features and all that.

The apps from the Mac App Store is so limited, it's a shame really.
 
Oh no, brain-washed Applezombies approaching! #

Seriously though, given Apple's recent track record of software updates (starting with Lion and FCPX), one is naturally hesitant if not outright negative about new developments. Especially when it comes to crucial software, like an Aperture replacement in this case.

I'm not leaving Aperture. They can't make me.
For me Snow Leopard, Lion and Yosemite were very stable.
 
I HATE that the Mac App store still doesn't let you download old versions of apps.

Things that downloaded fine on 10.6, 10.7, 10.8, etc now refuse to download/install, because they now "Require a newer version of OS X."

On of my MacBook Pro systems goes up to 10.7.

Some of our older systems (32-bit Core Duo) and ones required to run certain PowerPC apps can only go up to 10.6. I used Twitter on one to send outage notices, and it was updated and dropped 10.6 support a long time ago.

I can load old iWork '09 and iLife '11 apps from disc, but I cannot get much of the other software I use to be able to get.

You're not trusting the cloud enough.

/s

Are you serious?

Obviously, you don't need to apply these updates for Mavericks compatibility. The prior versions were already compatible with Mavericks. The updates are for compatibility with Yosemite.

He is serious.

Try downloading Aperture from the MAS on a Mavericks equipped computer right now for instance.
Also, the update is clearly showing more than a compatibility fix in the change log.
It says, and I quote: "This update addresses compatibility with OS X Yosemite and stability improvements" [emphasis mine]
Source: Mac App Store > Aperture > changelog

Glassed Silver:mac
 
Considering they're selling subscription services for online storage now, yes, I imagine they want all your data on iCloud no matter how big it is.
"Have you considered our terrabyte plan?"

(as someone with a 200gb iTunes library and 20k iPhoto files)

Sorry, but the terabyte plan, while too expensive makes me nervous. I have enough space now, but I wonder what's going to happen in a year, two years, three years down the road. I am not going to stop taking pictures, and I don't want to have to start worrying about culling my photo collection.

I bought one of my iMacs 4 years ago, and I put a 2TB drive in it at the time. Not because I had the data to fill it up right then, but because I didn't want to run out of space later on.

I believe Apple's cloud storage sizes and pricing is short sighted.
 
I thought iPhoto was going to die yesterday with 10.10 coming out.

Was super curious to get the Photo app.

They will keep iPhoto alive until Photos releases early next year.

iPhoto looks horrible on Yosemite anyways like it always has on any OS X release to be honest.. I wonder if they will keep the iLife name for the suite with iPhoto being taken away, considering iWork and iLife has always contained 3 apps.
 
Sorry, but the terabyte plan, while too expensive makes me nervous. I have enough space now, but I wonder what's going to happen in a year, two years, three years down the road. I am not going to stop taking pictures, and I don't want to have to start worrying about culling my photo collection.

I bought one of my iMacs 4 years ago, and I put a 2TB drive in it at the time. Not because I had the data to fill it up right then, but because I didn't want to run out of space later on.

I believe Apple's cloud storage sizes and pricing is short sighted.

I just don't bother with it as the alternatives are much better. Dropbox for sharing files between clients, friends, whatever. Or services like Crashplan and Backblaze for giant, cloud backups.
 
I just don't bother with it as the alternatives are much better. Dropbox for sharing files between clients, friends, whatever. Or services like Crashplan and Backblaze for giant, cloud backups.

Understood, but the reason I use Apple products is for the ecosystem. Because it just works (usually).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.