Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
65,619
34,218


The Apple Vision Pro headset comes with an external battery pack with a capacity of 3,166 mAh, compared to the 3,274 mAh battery found in the iPhone 15 Pro, although the voltages are different so the measurement alone can't be considered equivalent. Reviewers have also reported that there are significant size and weight differences between the two.

vision-pro-battery-pack.jpg

According to Daring Fireball's John Gruber, the Vision Pro battery is about the width and height of an iPhone 15 Pro, but thicker. Weight-wise, it is also heavier: About 325g, compared to 187g for an iPhone 15 Pro. "It's closer in thickness and weight to two iPhone 15's than it is to one," according to Gruber.

Marques Brownlee in his unboxing video also described the battery as "pretty heavy," and compared it to phones with larger capacity 5,000+ mAh batteries that feel "much lighter." We'll probably have to wait for a teardown to find out what the additional weight can be attributed to.

The external battery pack that comes with the Vision Pro is silver, has a proprietary connector for attaching to the headset, and a USB-C port for charging via the included 30W wall charger. The proprietary connector is connected to the Vision Pro by rotating it a quarter turn to lock it into place.

For those considering buying an additional $200 battery pack, one thing to bear in mind is that Vision Pro batteries are not hot-swappable: As Gruber notes, there is no built-in reserve battery in the headset, so when the power cable is disconnected, Vision Pro immediately powers off. A manual reboot is therefore required to switch batteries.

Apple says the Vision Pro provides up to two hours of battery life overall, and up to 2.5 hours for 2D video playback specifically. However, several reviewers claim to have gotten up to three hours out of a single charge in general use, with one reviewer saying they were able to watch a three-hour movie on a single charge.


In terms of battery life, it doesn't make sense to compare the Vision Pro to the iPhone 15 Pro, given that the former undoubtedly draws a lot more juice to power an array of much more sophisticated cameras, sensors, displays, speakers, and microphones.

Apple Vision Pro launches in the U.S. on Friday, February 2. Apple has said the Vision Pro will launch in additional countries later this year.

Article updated to remove phrasing that implied mAh measurement alone is equivalent without an indication of voltage. Apologies for the error.

Article Link: Apple Vision Pro Battery Isn't Hot-Swappable, Switching Requires Restart
 
Last edited:

Muero

macrumors newbie
Sep 20, 2016
29
131
Ohio
This article is awful. Watt hours (Wh) is a more accurate and consistent way to compare the total amount of energy that similar types of batteries can store. The iPhone 15 Pro's battery is 12.7Wh, while the Vision Pro's battery is 35.9Wh. This article's headline is a lie.
 

jclardy

macrumors 601
Oct 6, 2008
4,232
4,567
Everyone is upset about not being hot-swappable. But to me this is a great thing - if it was hot swappable, this headset would have a tiny battery, constantly being charged up/discharged to ensure it is always ready. That means the headset itself has a very finite lifespan, however long that tiny battery lasts. Then you would have to pay apple for a $700 battery swap because of how delicate the procedure would be. With this - the Vision Pro can be used 10 years from now by just buying an eventual third party battery with a cloned connector.
 

BarrettF77

macrumors 6502a
May 24, 2015
922
1,273
What I don’t understand is is why is this enclosure so incredibly large versus the size of what the battery pack is in an iPhone 15 and how skinny that is and yet it’s bigger on the phone. I feel like there’s additional stuff in there or they’re not using the space very well.
 

wikiverse

macrumors 6502a
Sep 13, 2012
733
1,136
It's funny watching everyone correct the MacRumours article, and completely ignore the fact that the correction is still pretty garbage. Most people are gonna end up tethered to a power outlet, at which point you may as well just have a monitor at a desk.

Honestly, Apple should have withheld this for a couple more years and removed a lot of the limitations people are mentioning in the early reviews. No one was in desperate need of this product.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.