Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I didn't look at the actual study, so it may have given you more insight into their usage. But just imagining off the top of my head, I'd venture to assume that the more intuitive the UI/the smoother the performance/the more stable the AR/the more high fidelity and lag-free the image and video--the better the overall experience for the doctors. It's just general UX stuff, but I'd think it all comes into play if say they need to reposition floating displays, switch between different views, have multiple displays/views open, maybe multiple apps open, etc. I'm sure other headsets out there now can do these things, but the question is if it can do them as well as the VP, or well enough that the doctors would have no qualms switching devices. I'm not at all up to date on the headset scene, so maybe the VP has strong competition now. If they're at the same level now, I didn't know. But honestly, I don't why people seem to care about this so much. My only reason for doubting your statement was that to me it seemed to make presumptions about another profession's needs, possibly oversimplifying, in my opinion very unnecessarily. But maybe you are more familiar with that profession than me, or maybe reading the study gave you enough insight to justify your statement. But also it seems like many here are itching to agree with you without having done the research. All this strong hate for a tool is just odd to me.

I did not need to presume anything because familiarity with the surgery is not necessary to understand what was done here. It was nothing that couldn’t be done with another HMD.

Read the paper. Watch the video.
 
What’s your impression comparing certified monitors with Apples pro-model screens, like the iPad, macbook pro, maybe the studio display? A side-by-side comparison would be really interesting.
The last monitor I bought is the Pro Display XDR which is comparable to certified Monitors but not certified and it is not easy to calibrate - you need third party measurement tools and software ... a nightmare, not worth it.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Johnny London
One of those cases where you make a good product and it just snowballs into assisting so many tangent fields because it's... useful

Not sure Apple thought of medical professionals using this like they are now, but lower operating times is always a good thing
What in your opinion will this "snowball into"?
 
  • Like
Reactions: cgmeeks1
Hmmm….20 percent less time, means 20 percent less time under anesthesia, always a good thing, less OR time means more OR availability over the course of a day, and eventually, perhaps more long term, insurance may even cut the cost of reimbursement to the physician and facility or at the very least hold down insurance costs for awhile. Interesting to see how many other different types of providers try it in their practice.
 
The last monitor I bought is the Pro Display XDR which is comparable to certified Monitors but not certified and it is not easy to calibrate - you need third party measurement tools and software ... a nightmare, not worth it.
The newest Pro XDR monitors are medically certified now. Here are notes from their product page.

Reference Modes:

  • Medical Imaging (DICOM-350 nits)
  • Medical Imaging (DICOM-600 nits)

  1. The medical imaging presets should not be used for diagnostic purposes unless the display has been calibrated using the Medical Imaging Calibrator on macOS and paired with a compatible DICOM viewer. The presets are available on Studio Display XDR and are intended for use by medical professionals. Not intended for use in mammography.
 
  • Like
Reactions: apple020997
Early adoption by tech-savvy surgeons will ideally inspire the younger generation, whereas established surgeons who prefer traditional methods may face a steeper learning curve.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.