Good luck with that! There's zero chance that anyone can be efficient and proficient in Excel using this headset as is. Maybe in 5-10 years, maybe.
This may have been answered but the Power Glove did not provide haptic feedback. The Power Glove pretty much sucked a__! But it looked cook, that is for sure.not impossible, just requires extra hardware, Nintendo even had the power glove for this use in *1989*, I think Apple would prefer to avoid making such things though - maybe we'll get third party hardware.
EDIT: not sure the power glove actually had haptic feedback come to think of it, but other simillar hardware that's followed since have
Good luck doing real work on this thing as is. Imagine trying to create/modify large Excel spreadsheets with hand gestures, or God forbid using Siri. Or creating a large Word document by air-typing or using your virtual keyboard on a hard surface. No thanks. I'll take my physical hardware all day long and I will out perform anyone using this thing when it comes to getting real world work done. Of course you can add a physical keyboard and mouse but that means more hardware right off the bat. That takes away from the whole experience.This. People are not seeing this in the right way... it's an ultraportable laptop with infinite screens.
I do imagine I'd want a bluetooth keyboard.
It will be interesting going forward to see how it breaks down. As physical keyboards become less prominent, speech to text will probably become the standard but there will always be holdouts that cling to physical and virtual keyboards too.I don’t strictly do ten-finger typing either, more like 6-8-finger typing, but the same still holds. In any case, I was addressing the office/replacement scenario, where this is certainly relevant if you do any significant typing.
Certain apps do require more hand-eye manipulation but many of these same apps will also become obsolete. I don't use Excel much but I've seen assistants like ChatGPT make the creation by humans of large spreadsheets and formulas completely unnecessary. A few quick prompts does in seconds what it can take minutes for a skilled data manager to do. And since it's pure data and not internet-based "facts" or opinions, there is little chance of incorrect data or AI hallucinations.Good luck doing real work on this thing as is. Imagine trying to create/modify large Excel spreadsheets with hand gestures, or God forbid using Siri. Or creating a large Word document by air-typing or using your virtual keyboard on a hard surface. No thanks. I'll take my physical hardware all day long and I will out perform anyone using this thing when it comes to getting real world work done. Of course you can add a physical keyboard and mouse but that means more hardware right off the bat. That takes away from the whole experience.
Er…. yeah. Let’s talk again about that in a couple of years.Certain apps do require more hand-eye manipulation but many of these same apps will also become obsolete. I don't use Excel much but I've seen assistants like ChatGPT make the creation by humans of large spreadsheets and formulas completely unnecessary. A few quick prompts does in seconds what it can take minutes for a skilled data manager to do. And since it's pure data and not internet-based "facts" or opinions, there is little chance of incorrect data or AI hallucinations.
So you want to use ChatGPT to do your work for you, got it. I honestly weep for our future. By the way, you still have to enter in most of the data for the columns and rows into ChatGPT, so you're really not saving nearly as much time as you'd think in the scenario you've mentioned. You can still save some time overall though, that I won't argue. Asking ChatGPT to create complex spreadsheets and having it done properly is something that isn't going to happen for many years, if ever. Good luck asking ChatGPT to create a detailed spreadsheet of tens of thousands of users containing PPI or any HIPAA related info. For grins, I recently asked ChatGPT to create an Ansible playbook for shutting down PeopleSoft app servers and its output wasn't even close to what you'd need to make it work.Certain apps do require more hand-eye manipulation but many of these same apps will also become obsolete. I don't use Excel much but I've seen assistants like ChatGPT make the creation by humans of large spreadsheets and formulas completely unnecessary. A few quick prompts does in seconds what it can take minutes for a skilled data manager to do. And since it's pure data and not internet-based "facts" or opinions, there is little chance of incorrect data or AI hallucinations.
So does your computer do your work for you? ChatGPT is just another tool. Those who understand it will use it to get the job and do the work. Those who walk into the job interview and say that they are the best at making spreadsheets and don't have any use for something like ChatGPT are not going to get the job. Just common sense job tech industry stuff.So you want to use ChatGPT to do your work for you, got it. I honestly weep for our future. By the way, you still have to enter in most of the data for the columns and rows into ChatGPT, so you're really not saving nearly as much time as you'd think in the scenario you've mentioned. You can still save some time overall though, that I won't argue. Asking ChatGPT to create complex spreadsheets and having it done properly is something that isn't going to happen for many years, if ever. Good luck asking ChatGPT to create a detailed spreadsheet of tens of thousands of users containing PPI or any HIPAA related info. For grins, I recently asked ChatGPT to create an Ansible playbook for shutting down PeopleSoft app servers and its output wasn't even close to what you'd need to make it work.
Haha, funny you mention "tech industry stuff" because I work in software. Yes, ChatGPT is a tool, but you made it sound like it was going to do your job for you. If that is the case, you won't have a job for long now will you? Back to the original point, good luck getting serious work done with this headset, as is. Not to mention the fact that wearing it for several hours a day, multiple days every week is going to cause you vision problems over time at best. We don't know the worst case scenario yet, but this device isn't bringing anything healthy to 95+% of the population. That I can assure you.So does your computer do your work for you? ChatGPT is just another tool. Those who understand it will use it to get the job and do the work. Those who walk into the job interview and say that they are the best at making spreadsheets and don't have any use for something like ChatGPT are not going to get the job. Just common sense job tech industry stuff.
I run a small wireless tech company with my brother so I'm all for giving employees the most tools to get the job done. But if they cannot justify their position, their position is in peril. They won't be replaced by AI in my lifetime, but they will be replaced by a person who has a better grasp of AI tools in the next few years. As far as the headset goes, I think we will be seeing many alerts for people using it for more than 1 hour to take a break. I also think we'll see some medical integration constantly scanning your eyes for fatigue and even potential vision problems. That's a very Apple-like precautionary measure.Haha, funny you mention "tech industry stuff" because I work in software. Yes, ChatGPT is a tool, but you made it sound like it was going to do your job for you. If that is the case, you won't have a job for long now will you? Back to the original point, good luck getting serious work done with this headset, as is. Not to mention the fact that wearing it for several hours a day, multiple days every week is going to cause you vision problems over time at best. We don't know the worst case scenario yet, but this device isn't bringing anything healthy to 95+% of the population. That I can assure you.
On this we agree. 🙂I run a small wireless tech company with my brother so I'm all for giving employees the most tools to get the job done. But if they cannot justify their position, their position is in peril. They won't be replaced by AI in my lifetime, but they will be replaced by a person who has a better grasp of AI tools in the next few years. As far as the headset goes, I think we will be seeing many alerts for people using it for more than 1 hour to take a break. I also think we'll see some medical integration constantly scanning your eyes for fatigue and even potential vision problems. That's a very Apple-like precautionary measure.
☝🏻 Mark up! See it in action here. Seems pretty accurate. 🎯
Make me laugh so hard. It's just a goofy device with no useful use cases at all, just a thing in a drawer collecting dusts or being used to show off in front of your friends once a year...
You can get everything done easily on your computer or tablet. This goggle thing is nothing but complicating the simple tasks.
Thanks for the link! That is amazing tech!no, but if you're willing to spend even bigger bucks - check these guys out: https://haptx.com/
now that combo rocks!
Try to rationalize with some of your limited functional part of your brain. You are comparing between 2 completely different products with completed different nature of the products. You should remind yourself of visiting a doctor specialized on brain disfunctionality.Reminds me of all the posts predicting that people would only wear their new Apple Watch for a week before they tossed it into a drawer and never wore it again.
Nothing about haptics so far, but it would be interesting when using the virtual keyboard if you could hear key clicks! 🤞🏻I wonder if the virtual keyboard contains Haptic Feedback. If it does that would be amazing. Otherwise, it's going to feel like you are typing in the air.
It was revolutionary but Gen 1 iPhone was hampered and lacked a lot of features phones on the market already had. It was obvious iPhone would be the way of the future but its first model didn’t sell that well and lacked features. The same goes for VisionPro.But that iPhone had the best display and multitouch... best browsing experience... before iPhone you had resistive touch screens... iPhone was revolutionary device
A bit off topic, but I disagree with your comment that the original iPhone didn’t sell that well and lacked features of phones on the market. It actually sold very well, considering it was only available through AT&T (in USA), and more to the point it was a singular item in a market filled with all manner of cell phone form factors and features.It was revolutionary but Gen 1 iPhone was hampered and lacked a lot of features phones on the market already had. It was obvious iPhone would be the way of the future but its first model didn’t sell that well and lacked features. The same goes for VisionPro.
Good Gawd, no. The spreadsheets I deal with are too complex for this to work. Mispronounce a syllables and ever cell could end up #REF.😰 It's bad enough that Excel misinterpret everything as a date.😏Can you imagine working on a spreadsheet using voice commands?
And this is different than sitting at a desk to work on your computer, or a couch to watch a movie on a TV?And this is when man made the decision to live and exist on the couch, eventually losing his legs, developing short arms, and giant bug eyes.
Archeologists will gaze in wonder at the new evolution that ultimately destroyed the homo sapien species…
That may be so, but I’m curious:I can’t shake off this feeling that this will be like every headset ever, buy it, put it on, try out all the cool stuff, after some time get bored, throw it somewhere in the corner and never remember to put it on again.