Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
There are some suggestions here that it is the EU that is at fault, however, it is the national jurisdictions of (at least three) member states that have prompted Apple to issue this warning. None of that is down to the EU itself.

Further, it would seem that there is at least one other major US company that has been acting to influence policymakers in Europe to adjust the balance of regulation so that it would be detrimental to Apple's policies.

Who really is at fault here?
 
Maybe it’s been enough time on this and not worth fighting it anymore at this point.

Judging by the comments of many of the EU fellows here over the years, they seem to really get behind all the EU rules, fines and whatnot imposed on Apple and American tech companies in general.
This is a case of a “cake having and eating” problem, and the cake has been eaten.

So, maybe Apple should just follow through, respect the EU people’s decisions and enable all the at risk features and services.

The EU having access to its citizens or backdoor’s data, seems more like a problem to Apple and not the EU as a whole.

(of course, none of that should make it to the other side of the ocean)
 
Maybe it’s been enough time on this and not worth fighting it anymore at this point.

Judging by the comments of many of the EU fellows here over the years, they seem to really get behind all the EU rules, fines and whatnot imposed on Apple and American tech companies in general.
This is a case of a “cake having and eating” problem, and the cake has been eaten.

So, maybe Apple should just follow through, respect the EU people’s decisions and enable all the at risk features and services.

The EU having access to its citizens or backdoor’s data, seems more like a problem to Apple and not the EU as a whole.

(of course, none of that should make it to the other side of the ocean)
I would point out that the EU is not involved in this so far. Further, the article is about a USA company making a threat to withdraw a service in some European jurisdictions.
 
Maybe it’s been enough time on this and not worth fighting it anymore at this point.

Judging by the comments of many of the EU fellows here over the years, they seem to really get behind all the EU rules, fines and whatnot imposed on Apple and American tech companies in general.
This is a case of a “cake having and eating” problem, and the cake has been eaten.

So, maybe Apple should just follow through, respect the EU people’s decisions and enable all the at risk features and services.

The EU having access to its citizens or backdoor’s data, seems more like a problem to Apple and not the EU as a whole.

(of course, none of that should make it to the other side of the ocean)
EU might get involved if either Apple or said nation thinks the ruling is counter to EU law. Or equivalent to Texas, Florida and California prosecuting Apple over something. The federal government isn’t involved…
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: Fara82Light
"Prevent cross-site tracking" is not a full block for third-party cookies but it does disables most cross-site cookies. Assuming it works properly for the site you are visiting it should make the cookie notices mostly irrelevant.

Note that you can try to disable cookie notices with a content-blocking extension. I use uBlock Origin Lite and there are a couple of filter lists dealing with cookie notices.

In general, having a good content blocker is a must if you want to prevent as much tracking as possible as many tracking techniques are not addressed by the browser's default protections.
Thanks, I'll try uBlock. I read that Adblock Plus has a paid version that blocks cookie notices, but haven't tried it.
 
Thanks, I'll try uBlock. I read that Adblock Plus has a paid version that blocks cookie notices, but haven't tried it.

You are welcome. Most content blockers use similar lists or allow to enable similar lists, e.g. on uBlock Origin you can choose the EasyList or AdGuard cookie notices filter lists. I don't think you need a paid product.
 
Did not expect this…

I thought the EU was all about online privacy?

Guess they have just been paid off by big business?
EU antitrust law tends to favour smaller business. Moves like this make more sense when viewed through this lens.

Sometimes, what’s good for consumers isn’t good for businesses and vice versa.
 
Maybe it’s been enough time on this and not worth fighting it anymore at this point.

Judging by the comments of many of the EU fellows here over the years, they seem to really get behind all the EU rules, fines and whatnot imposed on Apple and American tech companies in general.
This is a case of a “cake having and eating” problem, and the cake has been eaten.

So, maybe Apple should just follow through, respect the EU people’s decisions and enable all the at risk features and services.

The EU having access to its citizens or backdoor’s data, seems more like a problem to Apple and not the EU as a whole.

(of course, none of that should make it to the other side of the ocean)

how is this supposed to give EU, of all bogeymen, access to citizens' data?

also, compare and contrast Apple groveling in China, and threatening to throw all toys out of pram in EU, which isn't even at fault here.
 
And yet you choose to use an Apple device. I think there is a clear determination people make when they choose between Apple or android, one of the factors being ‘who do I trust more with my data?’ My personal response to that is nobody but Apple.
With the recent reports of Apple saying they'll add advertisements to Maps, to me it's another sign to not take Apple's marketing at its face value. (and it could change at any time when they decide the line must go up, but steeper)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Boeingfan
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.