Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

MacRumors

macrumors bot
Original poster
Apr 12, 2001
66,335
35,393


Apple has released a report highlighting its concerns about how some companies could "weaponize" the EU's Digital Markets Act (DMA) interoperability requirements to access sensitive user data. The report came on the same day that the European Commission began consulting on the proposed measures for requesting interoperability with Apple's iOS and iPadOS operating systems.

European-Commisssion.jpg

The DMA, which came into force this year, requires major platform holders like Apple to provide third-party developers equal access to iOS and iPadOS system tools and features. One of the Commission's proceedings focuses on the process Apple has set up to address interoperability requests submitted by developers and third parties for iOS and iPadOS. While Apple says it is fully committed to complying with the interoperability regulations, which aim to create fair competition, it is worried about unintended consequences resulting from the law's interpretation that could have a negative impact on user privacy.

Apple's report specifically calls out Meta, which has made 15 separate requests "and counting" for access to Apple's technology stack. According to Apple, Meta's requests have included access to features like messaging capabilities, AirPlay, CarPlay, and the App Intents framework. If granted as requested, Apple warns that these permissions would potentially allow Meta's apps to access a range of user data spanning messages, phone calls, photos, app usage, and passwords on their devices.

"In many cases, Meta is seeking to alter functionality in a way [...] that appears to be completely unrelated to the actual use of Meta external devices, such as Meta smart glasses and Meta Quests," says Apple. The report continues:
"If Apple were to have to grant all of these requests, Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp could enable Meta to read on a user's device all of their messages and emails, see every phone call they make or receive, track every app that they use, scan all of their photos, look at their files and calendar events, log all of their passwords, and more. This is data that Apple itself has chosen not to access in order to provide the strongest possible protection to users."
Apple in the report is keen to emphasize its longtime support for developer access to device features through more than 250,000 APIs, but always with built-in privacy protections. The company points to historical examples like TouchID implementation and microphone access, where developers can take advantage of these features while maintaining privacy and control safeguards.

The report expresses particular concern about companies with previous privacy violations potentially circumventing GDPR protections through DMA requirements. Apple notes that while it processes data on-device whenever possible, other companies might use that information for their own gain. "Third parties may not have the same commitment to keeping the user in control on their device as Apple, and may prefer to move user information to their servers—where they can combine, profile, and monetize an individual's private data," Apple warns.

meta-interoperability-requests-apple.jpg

Apple's publication underlines its commitment to reviewing and implementing interoperability requests as per the DMA when feasible, but the company argues that solutions must preserve platform integrity and protect sensitive user data. As a way to achieve this, Apple outlines its four-step process for handling interoperability requests that includes initial assessment, project planning, development, and release phases.

"We will never abandon our bedrock commitment to our users' privacy and security," adds Apple. "We trust that the EC will seek to implement the interoperability requirements in a manner that respects the GDPR."

Meta yesterday responded to Apple's criticisms, claiming that "Every time Apple is called out for its anti-competitive behavior, they defend themselves on privacy grounds that have no basis in reality." However, Meta itself has previously come under criticism for privacy violations several times. Just this week, the UK's Ofcom said it was opening an investigation into Meta's Instagram for "turning a blind eye to ads for child sex abuse," while a new report by MLex said that more than half of UK scams involve Meta platforms.

Meta has also been fined €251 million ($265 million) by Ireland's Data Protection Commission for a 2018 Facebook breach affecting three million accounts in Europe, exposing names, contact details, locations, and children's data. Meta is expected to appeal the decision.

The Commission's interoperability proceedings began in September 2024 and are set to conclude within six months of opening.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple Warns of Privacy Risks in EU's DMA Interoperability Requirements
 
Last edited:
It's always about trust. Do I trust Apple more than Meta right now? Yes. Do I trust them for the next 10 years? Who knows.

But Apple is the one holding all your data and by keeping other companies out, they have a monopoly on that data.

It's like saying you mustn't buy 3rd party car replacement parts because now other companies could track on which parts are replaced. If you do not allow 3rd parties, the car company is the one having your data.

And saying "buy another car" is valid due to the number of manufacturers. But it's iOS vs. Android. So either be locked in the iOS ecosystem and fully trust Apple or let Google get your data but have more choice for 3rd party add-ons.

The only competition is Huawei's HarmonyOS but apart from that, all manufacturers rely on Google.

Apple's statement against the DMA is just them trying to maintain their monopoly. If you think it's about privacy, see where data is stored for Chinese users. And if the US requires Apple to stop end-to-end encryption, Apple will not hesitate to give governments your data. Privacy is just a convenience as Apple doesn't rely on data gathering like Google does
 
It's always about trust. Do I trust Apple more than Meta right now? Yes.

But Apple is the one holding all your data and by keeping other companies out, they have a monopoly on that data.
The way your bank has a monopoly on your money.
It's like saying you mustn't buy 3rd party car replacement parts because now other companies could track on which parts are replaced. If you do not allow 3rd parties, the car company is the one having your data.
It’s nothing like that.
Apple's statement against the DMA is just them trying to maintain their monopoly. If you think it's about privacy, see where data is stored for Chinese users. And if the US requires Apple to stop end-to-end encryption, Apple will not hesitate to give governments your data. Privacy is just a convenience as Apple doesn't rely on data gathering like Google does

Privacy and security is a primary selling point. Apple doesn’t make money from selling or abusing your data (you conspiracy theorists are welcome to take Apple to court for violating their well published privacy policies).

Meta? Your data and knowing everything about you, submitted, inferred, and bought from others, is LITERALLY how they make their money.

I get people want to both sides this, but Apple and all their “competitors” make money in two VERY different ways.

Apple is happy to sell you “expensive” hardware and not know who you are. The others are happy to sell you “cheap” devices and know you better than you know yourself.
 
It's always about trust. Do I trust Apple more than Meta right now? Yes. Do I trust them for the next 10 years? Who knows.

But Apple is the one holding all your data and by keeping other companies out, they have a monopoly on that data.

It's like saying you mustn't buy 3rd party car replacement parts because now other companies could track on which parts are replaced. If you do not allow 3rd parties, the car company is the one having your data.

And saying "buy another car" is valid due to the number of manufacturers. But it's iOS vs. Android. So either be locked in the iOS ecosystem and fully trust Apple or let Google get your data but have more choice for 3rd party add-ons.

The only competition is Huawei's HarmonyOS but apart from that, all manufacturers rely on Google.

Apple's statement against the DMA is just them trying to maintain their monopoly. If you think it's about privacy, see where data is stored for Chinese users. And if the US requires Apple to stop end-to-end encryption, Apple will not hesitate to give governments your data. Privacy is just a convenience as Apple doesn't rely on data gathering like Google does

How can a company not have data on its customers?

That's like saying BMW not wanting to share all their customer data with the world is proof of them wanting to hold a monopoly.

That's absurd.

The 1st party will always have data on its customers, because, well, they are one side of the exchange of value.

That isn't a monopoly, but rather the inevitable end result of doing business with someone.
 
Last edited:
It's always about trust. Do I trust Apple more than Meta right now? Yes. Do I trust them for the next 10 years? Who knows.

But Apple is the one holding all your data and by keeping other companies out, they have a monopoly on that data.

It's like saying you mustn't buy 3rd party car replacement parts because now other companies could track on which parts are replaced. If you do not allow 3rd parties, the car company is the one having your data.

And saying "buy another car" is valid due to the number of manufacturers. But it's iOS vs. Android. So either be locked in the iOS ecosystem and fully trust Apple or let Google get your data but have more choice for 3rd party add-ons.

The only competition is Huawei's HarmonyOS but apart from that, all manufacturers rely on Google.

Apple's statement against the DMA is just them trying to maintain their monopoly. If you think it's about privacy, see where data is stored for Chinese users. And if the US requires Apple to stop end-to-end encryption, Apple will not hesitate to give governments your data. Privacy is just a convenience as Apple doesn't rely on data gathering like Google does
It’s highly reminiscent of the Microsoft / Crowdstrike saga. Would it have been better if Microsoft were the only company with kernel level access to the OS? Sure, some people will cry “unfair”, like those seeking to hawk antivirus or anti-cheat software, and maybe users would actually have been better off in a less competitive market with a more dominant Microsoft where you know your computer system is far less likely to crash because of a software patch gone awry?
 
Maybe let users decide who they want to trust with their data?

The GDPR applies in any case, regardless of Apple’s privacy protections.
Because it's not just companies that can't be trusted, it's users too, (they make up companies remember).
 
  • Like
Reactions: DefNotAnLLM
European Union hasn't done anything for EU residents. Many decisions which they took only made our digital life difficult. Through GDPR, they force us to go though cookie settings every time we open a website. How hard it could be if they had only force websites to have a yes or no button once, until we close the browser or reset cookies?

Forcing Apple to use USB C on iPhones was good option as Apple, who started the era with USB on electronic devices didn't develop lightning in many years. If lightning (name doesn't comply with performance) had Thunderbolt 3 or 4 performance, I would never support changing to USB C as Lightning port always felt solid.

I moved from Android to iPhone as when I tried to block Meta to access other apps in Samsung, I had to use a guide from online and deactivate every access one by one manually. When I install a new app in iPhone, they always ask if I allow app to get access to other applications. I simply have to choose yes or no.
 
European Union hasn't done anything for EU residents. Many decisions which they took only made our digital life difficult. Through GDPR, they force us to go though cookie settings every time we open a website. How hard it could be if they had only force websites to have a yes or no button once, until we close the browser or reset cookies?

Forcing Apple to use USB C on iPhones was good option as Apple, who started the era with USB on electronic devices didn't develop lightning in many years. If lightning (name doesn't comply with performance) had Thunderbolt 3 or 4 performance, I would never support changing to USB C as Lightning port always felt solid.

I moved from Android to iPhone as when I tried to block Meta to access other apps in Samsung, I had to use a guide from online and deactivate every access one by one manually. When I install a new app in iPhone, they always ask if I allow app to get access to other applications. I simply have to choose yes or no.
This part, (at the very minimum), is pure uadulterated delusion.
 
European Union hasn't done anything for EU residents. Many decisions which they took only made our digital life difficult. Through GDPR, they force us to go though cookie settings every time we open a website. How hard it could be if they had only force websites to have a yes or no button once, until we close the browser or reset cookies?
that’s exactly what the GDPR asks for. A clear NO to deny any cookies, or a clear YES accepting the cookies. And to have the option to ether choose the kinds of cookies or to revoke the consent previously given.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.