Well gee, those all have higher capacity batteries there don't they? I see the original meaning of your post was that Apple should develop magic batteries, thanks for clarifying.
Got a tip for us?
Let us know
Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Apple Watch 2 Said to Feature FaceTime Camera, Expanded Wi-Fi Capabilities and New Models
- Thread starter MacRumors
- Start date
- Sort by reaction score
Well gee, those all have higher capacity batteries there don't they? I see the original meaning of your post was that Apple should develop magic batteries, thanks for clarifying.
Look at the second iPhone, that's terrible by today, too!
What I think: Gps chip and Gps-only mode for sufficient battery life is what the watch needs to become long lasting for many people.
Just so you get it right platinum couldn't possibly come in between $1,000 and $10,000.
Apple is planning a second-generation Apple Watch with new features including a front-facing FaceTime video camera, expanded Wi-Fi capabilities and possibly additional models based on new materials, according to 9to5Mac. The report claims the so-called "Apple Watch 2" is likely to be introduced in 2016 following the release of WatchOS 2 and native Apple Watch apps in the fall.
The new FaceTime camera will reportedly be built into the Apple Watch's top bezel and enable users to make and receive FaceTime calls on their wrists. Apple previously announced at WWDC that WatchOS 2 will have a new FaceTime Audio feature for Wi-Fi-based calling, and the new software also enables Apple Watch users to answer or reject FaceTime video calls through a paired iPhone.
A new Wi-Fi chip inside the Apple Watch 2 will expand the wrist-worn device's iPhone-free Wi-Fi capabilities for basic tasks, possibly including text messaging, emailing and up-to-date weather data. The new wireless chipset will also enable Find my Watch for tracking a lost, stolen or misplaced Apple Watch using Wi-Fi router triangulation technology as opposed to GPS.
Despite gaining several new features, the Apple Watch 2 will likely have similar battery life as the original model. The report claims that Apple has conducted market research and determined that, despite early concerns, most customers are satisfied with their Apple Watch's battery life, allowing Apple engineers to focus their efforts on other areas besides battery improvements.
Apple is also said to be exploring different Apple Watch variations beyond the Sport, Watch and Edition models currently available, in an effort to attract customers at price points between $1,000 and $10,000. The report claims it is possible, but not certain, that Apple may release new Apple Watch models based on metals such as titanium, tungsten, palladium or platinum.
Article Link: Apple Watch 2 Said to Feature FaceTime Camera, Expanded Wi-Fi Capabilities and New Models
Apple is planning a second-generation Apple Watch with new features including a front-facing FaceTime video camera, expanded Wi-Fi capabilities and possibly additional models based on new materials, according to 9to5Mac. The report claims the so-called "Apple Watch 2" is likely to be introduced in 2016 following the release of WatchOS 2 and native Apple Watch apps in the fall.
The new FaceTime camera will reportedly be built into the Apple Watch's top bezel and enable users to make and receive FaceTime calls on their wrists. Apple previously announced at WWDC that WatchOS 2 will have a new FaceTime Audio feature for Wi-Fi-based calling, and the new software also enables Apple Watch users to answer or reject FaceTime video calls through a paired iPhone.
A new Wi-Fi chip inside the Apple Watch 2 will expand the wrist-worn device's iPhone-free Wi-Fi capabilities for basic tasks, possibly including text messaging, emailing and up-to-date weather data. The new wireless chipset will also enable Find my Watch for tracking a lost, stolen or misplaced Apple Watch using Wi-Fi router triangulation technology as opposed to GPS.
Despite gaining several new features, the Apple Watch 2 will likely have similar battery life as the original model. The report claims that Apple has conducted market research and determined that, despite early concerns, most customers are satisfied with their Apple Watch's battery life, allowing Apple engineers to focus their efforts on other areas besides battery improvements.
Apple is also said to be exploring different Apple Watch variations beyond the Sport, Watch and Edition models currently available, in an effort to attract customers at price points between $1,000 and $10,000. The report claims it is possible, but not certain, that Apple may release new Apple Watch models based on metals such as titanium, tungsten, palladium or platinum.
Article Link: Apple Watch 2 Said to Feature FaceTime Camera, Expanded Wi-Fi Capabilities and New Models
Tungsten would be the perfect choice. It doesn't scratch, has a unique color and has heft so it feels substantial. The only issue is that it shows every kind of fingerprint which they could address in the design.
Some things to remember:
- I doubt they'll end support for the first generation of Watch any time soon. Your watch will still have value and features.
- Yearly refreshing isn't that surprising. iPhone 6 (out of contract) starts at ~$650 and and Macbook Pro starts at ~$1,300, yet there's better tech and/or new models coming out yearly.
- As long as your first gen watch isn't **** by then, you could sell it and pay for most of an upgrade.
The official IP rating allows the watch to be submerged up to 3 feet for 30 minutes. While Apple doesn't recommend it, I started doing laps in the pool with it on and so far so good. Even the sports band is holding up like a champ.
What's cool is, it even tracked my heartbeat very accurately (it needs to be very tight around your wrist).
I don't know about the long term implications but I'll have Apple Care Plus if it craps out.
There's definitely a sizeBle market for watches in the 1k-10k range, think Omega and Breitling. Plenty of people, myself and most family included would spend 3 or so grand on a watch with relative ease, but never 10. A titanium watch with sapphire display would be a perfect hybrid of the existing steel and aluminum models. It would be great to see a fully waterproof watch. When I saw the MagSafe charging method I thought, "Great! It'll be fully waterproof since there's no ports" Until we learned that there's the diagnostic port which is probably a main contributor to its' lack of waterproof-ness. My watch went black yesterday with what looks like a shorted-out pixel despite never getting wet in any way other than sweat and some sink splashes.
I don't understand the direction Apple is taking. They are focusing on the fitness aspect of the Apple watch and instead of rumors being
"Apple has plans to add a stand alone GPS module to it's Apple watch to compete with the likes of Garmin"
it turns into
"Apple follows <add a camera> formula for gen 2 Apple watch"
I can see it now:
Gen 3: Apple adds LTE radio to Apple watch instead of bio sensors
Gen 4: Apple watch now available in 46mm and special dbag 48mm edition.
Gen 5: Apple watch C. unapologetic-ally plastic.
If the 2nd gen increases onboard storage, allows for video playback on the watch itself, and improves its standalone capabilities, I may very well be a convert.
Honestly don't think I will ever buy another Apple Watch, in my opinion they are overpriced. I chose to buy an Apple Watch to add to my collection rather than upgrading my iPad to a newer model. My watch is really handy don't get me wrong , but it's not a device so much but an accessory which I find myself not wearing and using even less!
Lack of Face Time was seriously the only reason I didn't buy one this year, and will not buy one until it is included in the newer model. Why spend $500+ ($1000 for the model I want) for something that had features purposely held back? I know Apple is a company and know how and want to make a profit... But consumers need to learn to vote with their dollars and not purchase things with features purposely held off, only to be included in the next model to increase sales because consumers want the "new shiny iThingy"
You have a good point. I think Apple does what they do because it's worked for them in the past. If a feature works and people use it, why not incorporate it into another product? The iPad is a perfect example of this with the FaceTime camera, Retina display, Touch ID, etc.
Neat... They don't even need to widen the bezal to do it
Why can't they do this on the Mac ,, then the viewable screen area will be larger at a psychical form factor.... aka 13' will give u 15' viewable area if the bezel is hardly there.
Eliminate a few screen sizes right there ....
Why can't they do this on the Mac ,, then the viewable screen area will be larger at a psychical form factor.... aka 13' will give u 15' viewable area if the bezel is hardly there.
Eliminate a few screen sizes right there ....
I can't say I'm too surprised it's going to be a yearly refresh. Initially I thought the watch may follow the Cycle the computers are on.
However, I'm surprised they would release details this quick after the launch of the first one. For sure fulfill all the orders before you start leaking details of the second gen. Just my opinion. In the end though, it is just a rumor.....
However, I'm surprised they would release details this quick after the launch of the first one. For sure fulfill all the orders before you start leaking details of the second gen. Just my opinion. In the end though, it is just a rumor.....
From the article: "38% of the users surveyed said they’d recommend it to their peers". Further "A majority of users (68%) said the watch was making their lives easier, primarily because of convenience of the notification system that decreases how often users pull out their iPhones to look at them.Only 1 of 10 people recommends the Apple watch
http://www.forbes.com/sites/aaronti...s-not-yet-a-home-run-with-users-survey-shows/
I love the digital crown and use it quite a bit. My data is transferring to the Health App on my iPhone.
Most of the people who bought an Apple Edition could buy one every month and still be .... golden.
People who can afford the Edition model won't mind this one bit. Probably have multiple traditional watches that cost 3-4 times as much or more.
Bravo! The world has changed. Some folks can probably still drive their 57 Chevy. For years, less and less people have been purchasing and wearing watches. I hadn't worn one for over 20 years until I got the Apple Watch because it's a "Smartwatch". Get it? Times, needs and functionality change. The Apple Watch does so much more and it serves more purposes than getting the time or date.
To those who keep bringing up the "Edition" watch and persons who spent $10,000 or more: 10 grand is chump change to persons who could purchase anything at this price without a second thought. I am sure that none of them will miss a car, mortgage or yacht payment because they bought an "Edition".
Apple Can upgrade the watch as often as they like, I don't care, its not as if my watch is going to stop working, I can choose when and if I want to have a watch with newer features.
Phones come out every year and I don't upgrade mine every year.
I knew I was stupid to think the apple watch would be on a 2+ year product cycle. I haven't even had mine for 2 weeks and its already obsolete? Thank you, capitalism.
