The person you'd be pointing at is yourself.Just had to get my two cents in here. FaceTime? On a watch? Seriously?
I can't even think of a comfortable, convenient way to use a camera on a watch unless it's mounted in the digital crown so you can point at the person whose picture you're taking.
I can see why a camera may be useful for apps like Snapchat, but seriously, who wants to take a FaceTime call on their watch? Hold your arm up to face-level for 30 seconds and see how it feels, and now imagine talking to someone for minutes like that. Madness.
First of all, the type of people who paid 10k+ on Apple Watch 1 are not the type to care about knowing a new model would probably come out in a year. Regardless, they'll buy that one too.
Second, what idiot actually thinks Apple wouldn't release a new version of a product within 12-18 months, because you know, <sarcasm> it's not like they do that WITH EVERY OTHER PRODUCT THEY SELL. </sarcasm>
I need to get past Mrs. TheQuik first, and that's the obstacle.Hardly at the least for the iPhone (in the US) if you are on JUMP/NEXT or other installment package - you can upgrade every year at no cost if you wish.
It's the price of a first class international flight. That's not a weighty decision for some people...i would bet that is a minority of purchasers. but i have no evidence, true. my opinion.
A phone is usually held with the upper arm down, lower arm bent up, and wrist turned so that your palm is facing yourself. This is definitely more comfortable over prolonged periods than holding the upper arm up and palm facing away, as you have to do with a watch.Do you feel the same way about FaceTime calls on your iPhone? If not, how do you hold that up if not with your arm?
Like many things the watch does that the iPhone can also do, I think the idea is that it's sometimes more convenient for quick interactions. A FaceTime call just to say hi or a quick check in on your day (as opposed to a 30 minute catch up call) would be great on the wrist as you make your way through your day.
You don't need to buy it every year.Hmmm, yearly refreshes.... For a watch... Ugh Apple!
Apple Watch 2 will be out during the iPhone/iPad launch later this year just in time for Christmas. Why should they hold off on releasing new features. No one is forcing someone to be an early adopter of Apple Watch 2.I think this is a mistake. What about those people who spent $10K on the first generation Apple Watch? They get obsolete just like that? Apple Watch 2 should come out in 2018. People are still finding about its existence. At the end, it's just a watch, not a smartphone which we need to be buying every now and then.
Didn't get see it coming?Is it too late to return my Apple Watch![]()
finally A Rumor!
Apple is planning a second-generation Apple Watch with new features including a front-facing FaceTime video camera, expanded Wi-Fi capabilities and possibly additional models based on new materials, according to 9to5Mac. The report claims the so-called "Apple Watch 2" is likely to be introduced in 2016 following the release of WatchOS 2 and native Apple Watch apps in the fall.
![]()
The new FaceTime camera will reportedly be built into the Apple Watch's top bezel and enable users to make and receive FaceTime calls on their wrists. Apple previously announced at WWDC that WatchOS 2 will have a new FaceTime Audio feature for Wi-Fi-based calling, and the new software also enables Apple Watch users to answer or reject FaceTime video calls through a paired iPhone.
A new Wi-Fi chip inside the Apple Watch 2 will expand the wrist-worn device's iPhone-free Wi-Fi capabilities for basic tasks, possibly including text messaging, emailing and up-to-date weather data. The new wireless chipset will also enable Find my Watch for tracking a lost, stolen or misplaced Apple Watch using Wi-Fi router triangulation technology as opposed to GPS.
Despite gaining several new features, the Apple Watch 2 will likely have similar battery life as the original model. The report claims that Apple has conducted market research and determined that, despite early concerns, most customers are satisfied with their Apple Watch's battery life, allowing Apple engineers to focus their efforts on other areas besides battery improvements.
Apple is also said to be exploring different Apple Watch variations beyond the Sport, Watch and Edition models currently available, in an effort to attract customers at price points between $1,000 and $10,000. The report claims it is possible, but not certain, that Apple may release new Apple Watch models based on metals such as titanium, tungsten, palladium or platinum.
Article Link: Apple Watch 2 Said to Feature FaceTime Camera, Expanded Wi-Fi Capabilities and New Models
Do you feel the same way about FaceTime calls on your iPhone? If not, how do you hold that up if not with your arm?
Like many things the watch does that the iPhone can also do, I think the idea is that it's sometimes more convenient for quick interactions. A FaceTime call just to say hi or a quick check in on your day (as opposed to a 30 minute catch up call) would be great on the wrist as you make your way through your day.
Am I using FaceTime wrong? I always hold the phone up in front of me. And I'll take long calls on it.
Maybe it's just me? I thought that was normal.
And a long message is hard to dictate on the watch. Which is why you would only use it for short messages. And short facetimes.Explained previously, but it's to do with the position of the forearm. An iPhone or iPad is held with elbows down; a watch is held up with the elbow at ninety degrees. It's a big difference and massively affects usability.
Hold your arm up as if you were holding a phone: it's quite comfortable. Now rotate your arm as if you were looking directly at your wrist: it's very hard to sustain.
Honestly, unless I have a Bluetooth earpiece in I don't really want to have a long phone conversation on it either.You use completely different muscles though. I agree with the other poster. I can't imagine myself using FaceTime on my Apple Watch. It'd be too strenuous and awkward.