Another person who didn't get his pre-order in on time.
Give him some iFreebies and he will shut up.
Another person who didn't get his pre-order in on time.
Many of these questions actually seem to pertain more to Apple's HealthKit APIs, and several of the answers to Jepson's questions are detailed in Apple's Review Guidelines for developers that was updated in June.
In the document, Apple says that HealthKit information will not be stored in iCloud and that apps attempting to store health data in iCloud will be rejected. It also states that apps will not be able to share data with third parties without express user consent and that all apps that provide diagnoses or treatment advice will be rejected.https://www.macrumors.com/2014/09/15/apple-watch-privacy-concerns/
Why would express consent be approved at all? Can't we just block "sharing" period? Medical data is one of the MOST important private information to a person....
Connecticut Attorney General makes publicity grab. Next.
What about JANE... his wife?
Give him some iFreebies and he will shut up.![]()
t has gone down at Apple with iCloud, and then all these other big institutions getting hacked, there is going to be concern for how Apple will solve this problem, or at least try to prevent less. Apple is one of the biggest companies for having a track record of delivering exceptional products, anytime they slip up, you know eyes will be on them like a hawk and be al over it. ...asking several questions about how the Apple Watch will operate and requesting a meeting with Apple representatives.
Funny how a government can ask questions, but then someone like Lois Lerner and the IRS can lose an entire hard drive with valuable and likely incriminating evidence without most people caring.
Apple has all the incentive to keep peoples data secure. The government does not and that's not good.
Why would express consent be approved at all? Can't we just block "sharing" period? Medical data is one of the MOST important private information to a person....