Selecttive huh, or maybe you fail to remember the comments so heres the thread, and well hear is some of the comments i must of selectively remembered
https://www.macrumors.com/2013/09/04/samsung-unveils-299-galaxy-gear-smart-watch-with-one-day-battery-life/
POST 15
"1 day battery life, are they freaking serious? This is not a smart phone; it is a watch, and I don't want to be plugging it in every 24 hrs!
Massive fail, as usual wait for the real McCoy from Apple. This is a prime example of why Samsung copy, their original ideas suck!"
POST 18
"Fail on so many levels... 300 and yet another device you have to charge EVERY day? No thanks!!"
POST 32
"One day battery life? No thanks.
I won't get something like this until we are talking 2~4 weeks battery life."
POST 37
"A watch thats got "up to one day of battery life"?! What a joke..."
POST 38
"Trust Samsung to rush out another half-baked product just because they think that's what Apple is doing whilst putting no thought or effort into design or functional. Laggy and basically no battery life?"
POST 43
"Too pricey, bulky, laggy and crap battery life... total concept fail."
POST 45
"Seriously, this is why we don't have a smart watch/wearables device from Apple yet. They would never release one that got a day (or less) battery life"
POST 59
"1 week battery life would be ideal at this point, but 1 day is just pathetic.
Would Samsung really sell such a product to their own friends and family, and feel good about it?"
POST 70
"I thought it looked pretty sweet, until I saw the 1 day of battery and price"
there were 32 pages, so i guess you selectively missed them although the last post is telling of what people thought and what they would say when Apple came in more expensive and with the same battery life
"Of course you know what the responses to those will be after the release. We've already heard them..
1. The Apple watch is a fashion statement. It's a luxury watch. People pay premiums for fashion. $350 is not expensive.... etc
2. What's the big deal? I charge my phone every night. Non-issue.
3. Apple's solution is elegant. Once you've used it - you can't imagine how you have lived without it.
...and so on.."
Again, i have no gripe i just think Apple have rushed this to satisfy shareholders, and it would be be bad form but i think they will release a better version later on in Q4, this is what i was trying to point out
The Watch has been almost 5 years in development. There is no such rush. Your comment is utterly baseless. The watch is as good as it can be with existing technology. They have to enter the market now while the other watches have no traction; waiting would be foolhardy. They're entering the market last with the most mature product of the current lot; just as they always do.
Also, you want me spent my time to classify each posts by argument posters made to demonstrate that comments about battery life were not the main complaints against those other watches (except maybe the initial Moto360 which had terrible reviews about battery life)? Cherry picking doesn't prove your point AT ALL.
That's like saying the whole 2008 presidential election is about Obama being a Kenyan if I can find I can find a few thousand people/articles to say so...
If I spend time, I can find a very large bunch that just found the watches and their interface BUTT UGLY. That was the main argument against those watches.
People whine about lots of things here, finding a whine on one particular subject isn't too hard.
One thing you forgot is that commented about those non Apple watches actually knew their performance, while the comments about the Apple watch having a crap battery life are in the several hundred (if not thousand!!) without no one having ANY real clue. The number of threads on this subject alone is higher than the number of posts you listed above (yes, that large).
If you think those countless comments are "fair". Then' I'd question you bias.
My own main comment about those watches are that their UI is bad and the watches ugly.