I care so your claim is false.
He doesn't care so noone else should care either. That's how the world should be in his view.
I care so your claim is false.
Battery life of 1 week MINIMUM needed before i touch any "smart watch",
its not a usable device if i NEED to carry a charger around for my watch when i go overnight for business
Still undecided on this.... its one of the best smart watches to look at and the UI looked fantastic but 1 day battery life for me is the killer..... its a little but thick as well.
I'll probably ended up with the v2 which will last half a day but at least it'll be thin![]()
Sorry to say but the Apple Watch will be a monumental flop.
iPoop... iCry. I was so hoping for something more.
Great just what the world needs, another freaking MP3 player. Go Steve! Where's the Newton?!
Sounds very revolutionary to me.
hey - heres an idea Apple - rather than enter the world of gimmicks and toys, why dont you spend a little more time sorting out your pathetically expensive and crap server line up? or are you really aiming to become a glorified consumer gimmicks firm?
I still can't believe this! All this hype for something so ridiculous! Who cares about an MP3 player? I want something new! I want them to think differently! Why oh why would they do this?! It's so wrong! It's so stupid!
All that hype for an MP3 player? Break-thru digital device? The Reality Distiortion Field is starting to warp Steve's mind if he thinqks for one second that this thing is gonna take off.
Not exactly "revolutionary". With the economy in its current state, You'll be able to pick up MP3 players for peanuts soon. The Archos Jukebox does the same thing and it's not blowing off the shelves either. $399 is just too much for an MP3 jukebox. Sorry Steve, this isn't it...
Although nice there is nothing "magical" or "revolutionary" about the device. I was expecting so much more from apple on this one.
This is a giant iPhone, there's no other way to put it. You can love it, you can hate it but in the end it is a giant iPhone. Not revolutionary at all.
Just an oversized Ipod Touch. This will not sell well no need for this device.
Will not be good for reading books neither not using the ink technology.
Its basically a big iPod touch.
I wanted to get excited over this, but all I can muster is a resounding "meh." Looks like it does everything an iPhone does...only less. Big screen and no-contract data is very cool though. So 140 something million iPhone and iPod touch owners already know how to use it...that's how many people have little use for this thing since they already have a device with the same functionality.
Consider me disappointed. What is the purpose of the device that the iPhone/iTouch can't do?
Every Mac device has a stature of something unique to it. This iPad felt like a iPod touch just made bigger. I see no advantage of the bigger screen, when one can spend a $999 and get a multitasking laptop with all the features you need without the touch.
This device needed something to set it apart, and they failed on that front. It needed a front facing camera for video chats. It could of had multi tasking since if this is a netbook killer, all netbooks can multitask. Sorry Jobs, you failed. You made a picture frame with an iPhone OS. Come back to me when you put the i5 in the laptops, I wanna upgrade.
the keynote could have been 5 minutes long. "Hey we took the iPhone and made it bigger, booya!" I can't believe this is it.
Yeah - epic disappointment. Was really hoping for front facing camera & iChat; multi-tasking; e-ink for i-books; larger storage capacity. Magical??? More like "pedestrian".
I sort of feel the same way I did about the MacBook Air. Meh. Nice product but hardly revolutionary.
cellphone makers - are just trying for dear life to create a new category that nobody cares for.
Steve jobs once said not to chase the trends but to create them
Apple has failed![]()
I see zero value in owning one, except for 'owning one'. If you do end up finding a decent reason, please let me know.
You'll be waiting 10 year, or until battery tech improves immensely with the current use cases of the Apple Watch, whatever comes first. If your usage is quite light, you could see something within 5-6 years even without new battery tech just because SOC efficiency is improving.
----------
Considering they didn't even distinguish in saying 1 day between the big one and the small one, I'd wager the bigger 42mm watch lasts close to 1.5 days of pretty intense use, 1 day for the smaller 38mm one.
I can see neither utility, nor beauty in these watches.
I also haven't worn a watch in years, but I really want to try this thing out.
I want to get one for my girlfriend and do that sending of heartbeats and drawing stuff instantly on her wrist - the ultimate geek romantic toy kinda thing.
I don't think any of us can really make definite negative predictions. I remember people not wanting a phone without buttons very clearly.
Who knows what coolness will develop from Apple watch workflows? There may be a killer app that makes more people realize they want it. It's loaded with cool sensors, that appeals to me!
Sorry to say but the Apple Watch will be a monumental flop.
Steve jobs once said not to chase the trends but to create them
Apple has failed![]()
They are pretty ugly IMO. And the prices make me laugh. Pay $500 for something that needs to be upgraded every two years? No thanks.
I hope they will at least produce the detachable bands in advance. Imagine waiting so long for the watch, only to discover that your preferred band is sold out. They better build that inventory well in advance.
True, but with all wireless tech (Apple products included), that 1 - 1.5 days of battery life when the devices are brand new, easily slips to maybe .75 - 1/1.25 battery life after a year.
----------
They are pretty ugly IMO. And the prices make me laugh. Pay $500 for something that needs to be upgraded every two years? No thanks.
They are pretty ugly IMO. And the prices make me laugh. Pay $500 for something that needs to be upgraded every two years? No thanks.
When did Apple say you have to upgrade every two years? We know nothing about this device except that the cheapest model will start at $349.
Gearing up. #
Interesting. Figuring out the preferred band ahead of time will be hard for Apple. That said, the bands should be easy to build, especially the plastic ones. Of course I've seen Apple run out of cases at iPhone launch. So who knows.
I'm guessing the steal watch goes for $500. If it is $400, then that is the price without the band. Some of the bands for the steal watch are really nice. The bands alone are worth the jump from $350 to $400, they are that nice.
LINK BRACELET
Crafted from the same 316L stainless steel alloy as the case, the Link Bracelet has more than 100 components. The machining process is so precise, it takes nearly nine hours to cut the links for a single band. In part thats because they arent simply a uniform size, but subtly increase in width as they approach the case. Once assembled, the links are brushed by hand to ensure that the texture follows the contours of the design.
MILANESE LOOP
A modern interpretation of a design developed in Milan at the end of the 19th century. Woven on specialized Italian machines, the smooth stainless steel mesh wraps fluidly around your wrist.
MODERN BUCKLE
A small French tannery established in 1803 produces the supple Granada leather for this elegant band. The smooth top-grain leather is lightly milled and tumbled to maintain its refined texture.
LEATHER LOOP
The Venezia leather for this band is handcrafted in Arzignano, Italy. With an artisan heritage spanning five generations, the tannery has a history of partnership with some of the most prestigious names in fashion.
CLASSIC BUCKLE
From the renowned ECCO tannery in the Netherlands, the Dutch leather used for this band is milled to give the grain a subtle, distinctive texture.
because it WILL be updated every year. You're forgetting that this is not a classic mechanized watch, its a digital device and in this day and age, 1 year old product is already technologically obsolete. Its not like some Rolex that maintains its value, this watch will already lose 20% of its value after purchasing it. Thats just how it is with digital things. Apple and some folks are expecting too much from this.
I think the delays probably had to do with the failed sapphire but I'll betcha the Apple watch will be release with Gorilla glass and not sapphire.
Here's what Apple says about some of the bands on their website: