LOL But was it the extended version?What do you mean? I watched The Lord of the Rings from start to finish on my Apple Watch...
LOL But was it the extended version?What do you mean? I watched The Lord of the Rings from start to finish on my Apple Watch...
LOL But was it the extended version?
That’s a pretty big assumption to say that “literally almost everyone” uses what’s app. I don’t know a single person who uses it.
Well, to be fair, Whatsapp is bigger than huge. It's big mostly outside of the US, with more than 1.3 billion users, and is used in more than 109 countries (55.6% of the world). Over half the population of the country uses it in Germany, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Mexico and Brazil. Believe it or not, many of these stats are from 2 years ago.
Traveling around the world, I've seen ultra cheap plans that give you nothing but Whatsapp usage. I even have this sim sticker thing I picked up for travel that has no monthly fees, but allows you to use Whatsapp on 3G networks pretty much anywhere in the world.
It actually is a big deal if there isn't a Watch app, because it is the biggest, most used messaging app in the world. I think it sucks, but to keep in touch with friends around the world, I do need to keep it installed.
You can't deny that Whatsapp is a big deal, and I think it's unfortunate that there's no watch app for it. But calling that a "limitation" of the watch itself is going a step too far I think. There are other messaging services that do have watch apps. Probably the most relevant to this conversation is Facebook Messenger. So Facebook owns two messaging services, one with a watch app and one without. That right there tells you that there are other factors at work here, and classifying it as a limitation of the watch itself is unfair.Well, to be fair, Whatsapp is bigger than huge. It's big mostly outside of the US, with more than 1.3 billion users, and is used in more than 109 countries (55.6% of the world). Over half the population of the country uses it in Germany, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Mexico and Brazil. Believe it or not, many of these stats are from 2 years ago.
Traveling around the world, I've seen ultra cheap plans that give you nothing but Whatsapp usage. I even have this sim sticker thing I picked up for travel that has no monthly fees, but allows you to use Whatsapp on 3G networks pretty much anywhere in the world.
It actually is a big deal if there isn't a Watch app, because it is the biggest, most used messaging app in the world. I think it sucks, but to keep in touch with friends around the world, I do need to keep it installed.
You wouldn't want to listen to music from the AW speaker, it would be terrible. The speaker is so tiny that all bass and most mid-range will be inaudible. So be thankful you're not able to pester your surroundings with a truly horrible music experience.1: By default cannot listen to video/music from the AW speaker (headset listening only)
But I still think it’s unfair to expect Apple to call this out on their website.You can't deny that Whatsapp is a big deal, and I think it's unfortunate that there's no watch app for it. But calling that a "limitation" of the watch itself is going a step too far I think. There are other messaging services that do have watch apps. Probably the most relevant to this conversation is Facebook Messenger. So Facebook owns two messaging services, one with a watch app and one without. That right there tells you that there are other factors at work here, and classifying it as a limitation of the watch itself is unfair.
Agreed. Unless there is some policy or API reason that prevents an app from being written, that’s not really on Apple.But I still think it’s unfair to expect Apple to call this out on their website.
Perhaps there’s a reason WhatsApp haven’t developed a watch app or perhaps because people are moaning at Apple rather than telling WhatsApp they don’t understand how key it is to their user base
If Facebook Messenger has a watch app, then I don't see why Whatsapp can't.Agreed. Unless there is some policy or API reason that prevents an app from being written, that’s not really on Apple.
I don’t either, but it’s at least conceivable.If Facebook Messenger has a watch app, then I don't see why Whatsapp can't.
You can't deny that Whatsapp is a big deal, and I think it's unfortunate that there's no watch app for it. But calling that a "limitation" of the watch itself is going a step too far I think. There are other messaging services that do have watch apps. Probably the most relevant to this conversation is Facebook Messenger. So Facebook owns two messaging services, one with a watch app and one without. That right there tells you that there are other factors at work here, and classifying it as a limitation of the watch itself is unfair.
Can you expand on that? I go back and forth on LTE if i get a Watch.I agree, not a limitation of the watch.
Things I don't like about the watch:
Cellular is useless for travel.
I probably do this 2-3 times a week. Keeps me from having to pull out my phone.what is lacking on whatscrap? last time i checked i can receive and reply to messages on the AW
You can't deny that Whatsapp is a big deal, and I think it's unfortunate that there's no watch app for it. But calling that a "limitation" of the watch itself is going a step too far I think. There are other messaging services that do have watch apps. Probably the most relevant to this conversation is Facebook Messenger.
What do you mean? I watched The Lord of the Rings from start to finish on my Apple Watch...
Can you expand on that? I go back and forth on LTE if i get a Watch.
stainless has poor build quality (worse than the aluminum)
Button and crown lack quality tactile feel
I'm curious why you complain about steel's build quality. I've only handled a S3 steel watch in a store (I don't own one), but it felt far, far superior in touch/feel compared to my OG Sport watch, and particularly because of the ceramic/sapphire backpiece. The plastic back looks alright when it is new, but at well over 3 years old now mine is slightly fuzzy and never had the smooth, hard, dense feel when tapped that the black zirconia back has to begin with. The steel body is also nicer overall compared to aluminium. IMO.Aluminum is too soft a metal, stainless has poor build quality (worse than the aluminum)
Steel's sapphire crystal is basically fake
Can you expand on that? I go back and forth on LTE if i get a Watch.
These are not true in my experience. My S0 SS build quality is great. For example crown is super smooth. Much smoother than all other aluminum I had. It gave good feeling when you turn. Almost relaxing like touching AirPods case. (Yeah I do that many times a day)
I'm curious why you complain about steel's build quality. I've only handled a S3 steel watch in a store (I don't own one), but it felt far, far superior in touch/feel compared to my OG Sport watch, and particularly because of the ceramic/sapphire backpiece. The plastic back looks alright when it is new, but at well over 3 years old now mine is slightly fuzzy and never had the smooth, hard, dense feel when tapped that the black zirconia back has to begin with. The steel body is also nicer overall compared to aluminium. IMO.
Alu does have lightness in its favor tho. The steel watch is a hefty lump in comparison, especially if equipped with a rubber band versus a sport loop on the alu watch. And hardness? Never managed to scratch my alu watch, visibly anyway. I've banged it into stuff plenty times, but no marks. (Maybe under a microscope, but /care. sheesh lol)
Pretty sure the complaints about the sapphire crystal have been debunked. From what I recall reading most of them were based on the erroneous idea that something can only be scratched by materials of equal or higher hardness, which is not true.
So, return your watch and buy what you want. Nothing preventing that.
I love that people really try to defend their opinions with nail and tooth here.
- Regarding the speakers, just leave this topic if you keep whining about it not being good audio, the fact remains it is not supported by apple to listen music from the speakers. I elborated already where i come from on this point.
- The fact people disregard whatsapp and other major chat apps, is just dumb, most of those complainers here have it themselves on their iphone. There is no excuse for not having a dedicated version of whatsapp for the AW.. they are for every other mobile apple platform, the AW sells well enough. This is not a apple problem, and people miss-read into my OP to interpertate their own trolling agenda here, that is NOT what i mean with not shown on the apple site..
For lots of people its a expectation that major apps are also available for the AW itself but its not.
This is a opinion on its own yes, but whatsapp/facebook is part of our society as we know it these days, its a very real part of our online communication lines.
Sorry for coming off harsh, but i try to keep the list factual, there are lots of strong opinions here, and the occasional "troll" therefore, i try to keep this topic on the right path as i intended it.
I love it when people start topics but then ask people to leave if they offer a discussion the thread starter doesn’t like.
Simply because thats the whole reason of this post to list out factual things you can`t do with the AW, instead of lots of people coming here with opinions why items should not be listed.. Because in their opinion this or that reason....especially when the thread starter also defends his opinion with nail and tooth too.![]()
I love it when people start topics but then ask people to leave if they offer a discussion the thread starter doesn’t like.
Simply because thats the whole reason of this post to list out factual things you can`t do with the AW, instead of lots of people coming here with opinions why items should not be listed.. Because in their opinion this or that reason..
While that has nothing to do with the fact of the matter why it`s listed. Because those are facts, that`s what we try to gather here, factual limitations. Not your reason, why in your opinion it should not be listed. That does not apply for this topic, it`s that simple.
[doublepost=1536299752][/doublepost]
Because, i did not ask for a discussion on the items listed, you and others are arguing about things listed accordingly to the OP rules and you want to let your opinion heard why it should not be listed for other reasons then it clearly is stated why its listed. but regardless you keep nagging, because you need to keep forcing your opinions upon people.
That`s the difference. I reply because i don`t want to get this topic polluted with your opinions on the list itself.
I think the real problem is that people constantly need to have a opinion on anything even if its a FACT, it needs to be debunked somehow with a opinion.
So is it a fact the Apple Watch has a limitation in no whatsapp app? Or is it a fact that it’s a limitation of the service? What are the facts?