was really surprised to start seeing reviews this morning. only read the Verge's review so far (though I don't typically since they banned me lol)
I typically Find that The Verge's writers have Apples...
err
they're constantly extremely biased towards Apple in most reviews. (for example, they'll penalize one device for being too large at 5", but then say how apple's move to large device revolutionizes the industry).
I was expecting Nilay to have almost a sexual fascination with it.
But even he didn't. He looked like he was trying to dress it up as pretty as possible, but even couldn't get around a few of the glaring problems that many people have worried about.
UI interaction is sometimes confusing, cumbersome and doesn't always make sense.
interaction isn't as simple as it could be because of the button and crown not always responding the same way in every situation
laggy performance. (though Apple promising a fix)
slow to update apps.
the thing that interested me was what the "fashion" side of The Verge said about it. Which seems to be the biggest problem. Fundamentally, Apple made a device that is well built, and extremely well crafted, but a fashion accessory it is NOT, despite Apples marketing efforts. it still looks like a square screen on a watch band, even if done well, it's not a piece of fashion
the question now is did Apple overreach in what they expected the market for this to be? are they really going to be able to sell a million of these "gold" versions at 10,000? are they even going to be able to sell the normal version at $500 when fundamentally, it doesn't do anything really different than $300 alternatives?
time will tell. V2.0 will likely be a much much better product. But Nilay makes a great point whether you think he's biased or not. If its still quicker to pull otu your phone to do something, then the watch doesn't offer a real solution to any problem.