How is it laughable to compare the battery life of the Apple Watch to a conventional watch?
The fact is if you forget to charge the Apple Watch even once you will not be using it the following day. This is a huge drawback for the biggest feature of the watch: Telling you the time.
Remember when Steve showed off the iPhone and he said the killer feature was making calls? Well the killer feature of a watch is being dependable in always telling you the accurate time when you look at it. If the battery is dead because you forgot to charge it before you went to bed the night before it has failed in its most important faculty.
I was going to point out the 72-hour reserve, but I see someone else did and you responded appropriately.
I want to the Watch mainly for telling time. So I think I will have no issue getting more than a day, especially with the reserve. The notification feature is great, as I love it on my Pebble and the Watch has way more functionality.
Maybe "laughable" wasn't the right approach, and I'm trying to find a good analogy here, but it's like comparing a bicycle to a motorcycle. They're both 2 wheeled transportation, but one needs gas every so many miles, while the other might need a repair or two once a year. But you wouldn't talk about a Fixie when reviewing a Ducati, now would you? That's more along the lines what I was getting at. It just doesn't make sense to compare them. Their differences of purpose, and thus their differences in longevity, are so obvious that their is no need for comparison.