I also have a series 8 SS and I may upgrade only because the battery is trash.I have the Series 8, so I think this is a good upgrade to Series 11, so I’ll be upgrading
except, there are plenty of folks out there with a S5 or S6 (some even older) for whom the S11 would be a very meaningful upgrade, and next year it goes on.
Sure, the year-over-year Changs are not big changes but for those who keep their watches (or devices) for 4-5 years ...
I would argue that the previous smallest generational change was the Series 8 (compared to the previous Series 7), which had the same design, screen and chip but added a temperature sensor and Bluetooth 5.3 (and new colors). Most of the focus was on the introduction of the 1st gen Ultra though so the Series 8 was mostly overlooked at the time.Before the Series 11, the smallest generational upgrade arrived with the Series 5
No, it is the exact same CPU/GPU/NPU as the S9Absolutely. But there is near zero difference from 10 to 11. Legit just sliver more battery and improvement in coating on the glass.
I get it. But if there was at least continual SoC improvements every year then at least that would justify it a bit more. This time they literally just kept the same S10 SoC. Did the CPU within the S10 even change much, if at all from the one used in the S9?
we have been "brainwashed" for like 40 years of CPU performance improvements year over year, and we look at all computing tools that way, watch, phone, tablet, laptop/desktop ... and we've reached a point where those upgrades are becoming more and more marginal. computing devices from 5 years go are still "good enough" for more and more people ...Absolutely. But there is near zero difference from 10 to 11. Legit just sliver more battery and improvement in coating on the glass.
I get it. But if there was at least continual SoC improvements every year then at least that would justify it a bit more. This time they literally just kept the same S10 SoC. Did the CPU within the S10 even change much, if at all from the one used in the S9?
Yep, I never quite understand the fascination of seeing whether immediate upgrades are needed. I don't think any in recent years has been close to it. There are obviously usually some sort of improvements, but with Apple continually using 2-4 generations back as the benchmark for a new product, we know that even they can't justify it.With the watch, the better way to do this is to go back a few generations and give advice on which generation makes sense to upgrade. For me, Series 7/8 look like good upgrades to series 11, especially if you have an aluminum watch. But I guess Series 10 is also a good choice for those users - depending on how much more durable the front glass is.
I would argue that the previous smallest generational change was the Series 8 (compared to the previous Series 7), which had the same design, screen and chip but added a temperature sensor and Bluetooth 5.3 (and new colors). Most of the focus was on the introduction of the 1st gen Ultra though so the Series 8 was mostly overlooked at the time.
No, it is the exact same CPU/GPU/NPU as the S9
For what its worth, last year was supposed to be the big redesign, then this, and I think with the Apple Watch Ultra we are seeing strict limits on what they can do. I wouldn't bank on any big changes anytime soon.I have a series 6, and was considering upgrading, but I’m waiting for next year’s rumored big redesign. I don’t want to buy a new watch every few years, even if marketing tries to convince me otherwise.
The expected redesign will make it worth for me. Meanwhile, I’m thinking of changing the battery.
Don’t take me wrong -it’s not a money issue. I just don’t want to enter a spiral of consumption just because something looks cool. And next year I will regret it if I upgraded this year instead of waiting.
we have been "brainwashed" for like 40 years of CPU performance improvements year over year, and we look at all computing tools that way, watch, phone, tablet, laptop/desktop ... and we've reached a point where those upgrades are becoming more and more marginal. computing devices from 5 years go are still "good enough" for more and more people ...
As for the watch, I still have my S7 and upgraded from a U1 to the U2 when it was introduced 2 years ago.
s7 is noticeably slower when it comes to watchOS upgrades as well as boot time, and it is slightly slower launching apps but it does everything my U2 does just as good.
Where does the current CPU lack? I honestly don't know the answer to that question. Maybe not upgrading it is an indication that apple does not see the need for AI on the watch (which would be a good thing imho), or, they have something way bigger planned for next year, who knows?
Having said that, I was not impressed with the upgrades this year, there just isn't much, I had really hoped to see some new health sensors and would have upgraded, but that didn't happen...
News like this make me pretty confident it will happen this time: https://www.macrumors.com/2025/08/19/new-apple-watch-with-touch-id-and-more-uncovered/For what its worth, last year was supposed to be the big redesign, then this, and I think with the Apple Watch Ultra we are seeing strict limits on what they can do. I wouldn't bank on any big changes anytime soon.
With the Series 11, it is very clear that virtually no users should upgrade from a Series 10 – especially those with a titanium model, those who do not use cellular connectivity, and individuals in countries where the 5G upgrade isn't available.