Is it too late to buy the Apple Watch Series 2 now? Or is it still a long time until the new one get’s released?
I got a series 2,and I'm not so convinced that the next one will be different enough to be worth waiting for,I would buy the 2.
Exactly as I thought,an LTE option is not really useful for most users,as they normally have the watch connected to the phone.The only rumors (Aside from the battery/processor) thus far for 'Series 3' is an LTE option and a glass film display that has unknown benefits (Likely cheaper).
https://www.macrumors.com/2017/02/21/apple-watch-series-3-glass-film-touchscreen/
Series 2 should last for quite some time with the S2 processor. I personally am waiting for a major overhaul, as the same physical design purported for Series 3 won't likely warrant an upgrade for me.
Exactly as I thought,an LTE option is not really useful for most users,as they normally have the watch connected to the phone.
Yes,tjats a part of what i medan.When I run without my phone 3-4 times a week, I do NOT want to be bothered with calls or texts from my Watch. Running time is time to get away from all the hub-bub of our connected lives.
The usefulness of using my Watch for calls when my phone is in range is somewhat limited. I have to keep my wrist up close to my face in an unnatural pose to hear and be heard. I normally only use it in a quiet environment for short calls or to give me time to grab my phone if I know the call is going to last for more than 30 seconds.
I also do not want to pay for a second LTE service on my Watch, so I will pass on the S3 if that is all it has to offer over my S2. In my opinion, I would get the S2 as it has the key features to make it a worthwhile purchase today. (GPS, waterproof, fast launch with the dock, etc.)
TxWatch
Exactly as I thought,an LTE option is not really useful for most users,as they normally have the watch connected to the phone.
I'll buy Series 3 for fashion purpose if it has another cheap Edition like NIKE+ for Series 2.
Can't see myself getting expensive Editions like Hermès or Ceramic for a few years yet, sadly.
Well,not everybody buy a watch to use it as jewelry... If I want a timepiece as an attention catcher,I got other options than the Apple Watch,I would probably go for my old Rolex submariner or my great grandpas old Seth Thomas engineer watch,that he received from his work at Durango and silver ton railway.I'll buy Series 3 for fashion purpose if it has another cheap Edition like NIKE+ for Series 2.
Can't see myself getting expensive Editions like Hermès or Ceramic for a few years yet, sadly.
Well,not everybody buy a watch to use it as jewelry... If I want a timepiece as an attention catcher,I got other options than the Apple Watch,I would probably go for my old Rolex submariner or my great grandpas old Seth Thomas engineer watch,that he received from his work at Durango and silver ton railway.
If I want to check things up,I use my non-jewelry everyday watch I bought in the Apple Store.But then how can you check in places with Swarm?
Btw, I think LTE will happen .. one reason being I just don't see how music on the watch can be useful with slow syncing through Bluetooth. With LTE, Apple Music (or Spotify or whatever) will come alive for the watch.
If I want to check things up,I use my non-jewelry everyday watch I bought in the Apple Store.
And yes,LTE is the future,but for most normal users it's not very useful if you cannot use it as a total phone replacement.
That's obvious,but in the future,our internet habits may change. Gear like google glass or similar will make the need for a phone screen obsolete when on the go,and for use at home,or when traveling with public transport an iPad is far better. Ever tried serious photo editing on a phone screen? I have,and it's no hit.I think the watch will never be a total phone replacement. If it has LTE you will surely be able to place call, send text messages etc. (easier still with AirPods) but people also use phone for web & photo and with very small screen, the watch won't be able to fully replace a phone for those functions.
That's obvious,but in the future,our internet habits may change. Gear like google glass or similar will make the need for a phone screen obsolete when on the go,and for use at home,or when traveling with public transport an iPad is far better. Ever tried serious photo editing on a phone screen? I have,and it's no hit.
That's a long future. I only talk about immediate one when the watch will have LTE, supposedly next version and I think with AirPods it's already happening. The most complaint from using the watch as a phone is its speaker and AirPods will definitely solve that.
The speaker on the Apple Watch to me is not to bad. I have used it a few times for calls and it's adequate for what it's worth. But yes, Apple could enhance the speaker quality for future models.
Yeah. It's not bad. Works better than some of the in-car mic's.
It could use some improvements though. Probably some advanced noise reduction too.
I think @Relentless Power and I talking about speaker.
The small speaker forces you to have the watch close to your face to listen which isn't natural, & looks a bit ridiculous, when making call. With AirPods (or any Bluetooth headphone) you don't have to do that.
I'd say microphone on the watch is very fine. Most of times SIRI & Dictation works better than on my iPhone. :O