Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
While phone calls via Apple Watch aren’t perfect nor ideal, I’ve used the feature a lot more than I thought I would — sometimes it’s more convenient to take or make a call on the watch, such as when driving with my iPhone in my pocket. I use voice calling on my watch many times / week.

But what I love are AirPods. Wouldn’t go back to EarPods for anything!
I agree totally with the above comment.
 
They should make it compatible with Android. I'm sure the deep integration can be achieved if they really wanted to ;)

I think It would be a good Trojan horse in the android market and get back users as we know that andriod is the most used mobile operating system (i'm just talking by the numbers here).

That's a good idea. It could be where the iWatch is to Android what iPhone was to Windows, and look how that's turned out.

Never gonna happen though. Apple doesn't need nor want my money. iPhone is the single best-selling phone there is, and the watch is an accessory for that.
 



The third-generation Apple Watch, set to launch this fall with LTE support for the first time, is unlikely to support phone calls, KGI Securities analyst Ming-Chi Kuo told investors in a note shared this morning.

According to Kuo, while a voice service that replaces the iPhone's calling functionality is "feasible," he believes Apple must first work on improving the "user experience of data transmission." As a result, he says the Apple Watch "probably" won't support traditional phone calls "this year."

apple-watch-series-2-2-800x395.jpg

The watch could, however, support VoIP services like FaceTime and Skype, as FaceTime audio calling is already supported on current Apple Watch models.Kuo also says that based on a lack of internal space, the LTE Apple Watch is likely to use an eSIM instead of a physical SIM slot, with the device set up to share the same phone number with an iPhone. He warns that LTE connectivity in the Apple Watch could be limited to specific countries and markets as not all mobile operators support that particular business model.

Rumors have already suggested that the major carriers in the United States, including Verizon, AT&T, and T-Mobile, will support and sell the upcoming LTE Apple Watch.

Though Apple is currently embroiled in an ongoing patent dispute with Qualcomm, Kuo believes Apple will use Qualcomm chips in the Apple Watch because Qualcomm's technology is superior to Intel's with smaller chips that consume less power.

Finally, Kuo predicts Apple has no intention of developing an Android app for the Apple Watch at this time, given that it would be difficult to have the same deep integration between Apple Watch and an Android phone that's possible with the Apple Watch and iPhone.

The third-generation Apple Watch is expected to be introduced in September alongside new iPhones. LTE connectivity is expected to be the main selling point for the device, and while there were some rumors pointing towards major design changes, Kuo has previously said there will be no "obvious change" to the form factor.

Article Link: Apple Watch Series 3 Unlikely to Support Direct Phone Calls, but VoIP Calling a Possibility
 
Honestly, Apple should delay the release of the AW3 until it has more features in the way of improved and new health sensors, including UV, altimeter, blood pressure and a better heart-rate monitor with improved Bluetooth and battery life to go along with LTE capability.

I'm not sure there's enough there right now to get the consumer excited.
 
Anyone who's answered a call on their watch knows the experience is less than ideal so I'm not sure they'd want to make it a self contained phone unless threads was going to be a headset or headphones with mic option with it
 
I think a lot of people are missing something important: If the watch is completely untethered from the phone, then that means that the watch is going to have 100% native apps and will likely be much faster than previous models. It will be like a micro iPad with a data plan.

As for the data plan, I really hope it is something virtual where your watch just shares the same data plan as your phone. I'm not willing to buy a data plan for my watch, lol. That's crazy. Maybe someday when the watch can do a lot more if it's only $5/mo. But considering the limited data it would use anyway, it should just be included with service. If AT&T and Verizon charge for it, I could see T-Mobile offering it free with service to compete, which I would be fine with since I switched to them earlier this year.

Exactly. Potentially bigger than phone calls or LTE/cellular I think is the possibility of the Watch acting as an independent device (even on wifi) with 3rd party apps not needing the phone to run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macduke
I want my next Apple Watch to work 80 hours on one charge and always display the time during the day.

"Sorry, but you'll need a regular watch for that" :)

Btw.. what the hell is an eSim.... The Apple watch with LTE, would get better value, if no sim required at all.... Mobile carrier deal with the serial number of the watch when get it. but at least u can save space by incorporating the electronics within the watch itself.

Since its gonna be limited by mobile carrier anyway, that makes better sense.. Think CDMA, expect its not a CDMA at all.. its GSM.
 
Last edited:
Anyone know what other countries "support this business model"? Canada?

Being that it’ll likely use an eSIM, I think at this point we’ll have to wait and hope that carriers in Canada support eSIM for add on devices. If I had to guess, I’d say it’ll be a US only launch at first (cellular connectivity).
 
Man are they really going to do Series 3 this year? I was thinking it would be every 2?

I don't know if we have confirmation of a fall launch?

I don't think the watch will follow the iPhone path of annual upgrades, but more the iPad or AppleTV of every 18-24 months.
 
Kinda bad news. A truly standalone Watch needs to be able to support calls IMO. Otherwise I can not leave my phone at home without compunction.
And phone calls on the Watch will not suck as long as you use AirPods.
 
  • Like
Reactions: koigirl
Kinda bad news. A truly standalone Watch needs to be able to support calls IMO. Otherwise I can not leave my phone at home without compunction.
And phone calls on the Watch will not suck as long as you use AirPods.

You can't expect all people to use Airpods just to make a phone call... even if they did come in the box.
 
Two things:

I am ok with LTE only, I would think the "calls on other devices" on iPhone Settings will allow regular calls to go over VOIP on LTE just as it does on wifi

If it shares the same number, curious as to what happens for customers on a corporate plan (where the company pays the bill). I know mine will not jump through any hoops to add a device to my subscription even if it were free.
Yep. No way work is adding Apple Watch data to my plan.
 
Sure, that's why there won't be Android app for Apple Watch. :rolleyes:
My prediction is because Apple wants to keep their customers in their ecosystem. :D

If you would like to quote me, please refer to me as "respected and esteemed MacRumors Forums member shyam09".
 
You can't expect all people to use Airpods just to make a phone call... even if they did come in the box.

If you don't want to use the Watch (or AirPods) for phone calls, simply don't do it. But a lot of people, including me, would be happy with that feature.
 
That's a good idea. It could be where the iWatch is to Android what iPhone was to Windows, and look how that's turned out.

Never gonna happen though. Apple doesn't need nor want my money. iPhone is the single best-selling phone there is, and the watch is an accessory for that.

So true, I always thought the real name of the Apple watch was "Iphone Watch" "
 
They should make it compatible with Android. I'm sure the deep integration can be achieved if they really wanted to ;)

I think It would be a good Trojan horse in the android market and get back users as we know that andriod is the most used mobile operating system (i'm just talking by the numbers here).

I believe that the Watch eventually will, when it becomes its own hub for Apple's own line of wearables. Just not today, as the Watch is still functioning as an accessory designed to drive iPhone sales and improve retention rates.
 
Kinda bad news. A truly standalone Watch needs to be able to support calls IMO. Otherwise I can not leave my phone at home without compunction.
And phone calls on the Watch will not suck as long as you use AirPods.
So the cost of the watch+ $160 just so the experience doesn't suck. Got it
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.