[doublepost=1537763173][/doublepost]Series 5 will have Autumn detection.
So only people 65 or older can fall down and need this.... condiscending at best ... insultingSeries 5 will have Autumn detection.
I mean you realized these videos were the ones cited in this article on macrumors right? And by every indication, it's a gimmick and barely works. Heck in the last test, both the guy and kid slap the ground hard just to try to get it to activate and only one worked! Lol
Those are not tests, for actual falls. You know it yet you go blah blah blah blah.
Yeah keep moving the goal post. If slapping your wrist hard doesn't create enough g force to detect a fall then yeah 100% a gimmick. Apple knew they couldn't demonstrate this on stage. That's why all they did was show a cartoon picture. They aren't stupid.
Source?
https://nam-auth-dev-cdn.awspreprod...tch-shows-tech-companies-finally-considering/
https://www.theverge.com/2018/9/19/17875882/new-apple-watch-series-4-review-ekg-bands-screen-price
Probably said it on stage since it's reported in ALL REVIEWS.
Next time, I'm not doing your job buddy. Got that.
" Again, Apple’s health claims are not that the Watch will detect these falls, but simply that it could."
This is literally from the verge review lol. So again, if it's not reliable then it's a gimmick at best. And by every single review, including the verge review, they couldn't get it to work.....
I am going to go out here on a limb and state my obversations on this feature and AppleWatch Series 4. Generally most elderly people have poor eyesight/vision, not all however most. Even with the increased size of Series 4, an elderly persons hand and finger dexterity can be less than precise (not all however most). Given that WatchOS is simpler than most to navigate, it still has quite a bit to go to make it elderly friendly. Many elderly people do not understand new/er technology advances (there may be some exceptions to this). Fall detection is great for certain age groups (most can benefit), however given the above how quickly will an elderly person even dismiss false positives.
Granted that usually some tech enthusiast family member or an Apple Store employee will configure these devices, my understanding is that most elderly people end up confused or lost in mobile technology. I am having a hard time understanding who this feature and device is really for. People who are genuinely fit, don’t require a device to get them moving (which includes me), for those who need some digital encouragement great, however would that not be better suited for a larger device such as a phone or even something smaller like a FitBit at a fraction of the cost.
If you are an elderly person the technology has to seamlessly integrate into your lifestyle with zero or minimal learning curve, most will not even use half the power of what Series 4 will offer let along prior models. If it was a simple device with a single button that has this algorithm built into it that would be great. Press button for help, press twice to cancel, has a red light that falshes when activated for help and can detect Falls and provide a voice prompt.
It is not great to age, your vision, hearing, dexterity, balance, etc take a severe hit. Cognition may also be affected, though that is not always the case. Usually the elderly do not have time to invest in complex technology, most will try if their cannot figure it out, their tend to forget and not try again.
Though Apples marketing tells us that every elderly person is some Apple tech enthusiasts and raves about the AppleWatch, in reality most don’t receive enough of a pension or social security and struggle on a daily basis to obtain food, housing, clothing, medical, dental, etc. I am sure the AppleWatch is not on their priority of things in their remaining years.
I am curious to hear people’s thoughts on this.
[doublepost=1537754463][/doublepost]
I concur, the G-force and length of fall would not trigger Fall Detection if the algorithm is good. Besides you can always turn it off when boarding these rides if it is of a concern.
[doublepost=1537754543][/doublepost]
I believe ECG is also not available until later this year. All this fuss over a larger screen with more complications. I have had some hard falls in my time, never required the assistance of feature or emergency such as this. Even light to moderate activity will strengthen the body to recover quickly. Which I guess is good for any wearable device to encourage a healthier lifestyle, however if you were already healthy prior to Series 0 introduction or even the FitBit, it may just offer an expensive encouragement at most.
The verge could not reproduce a fall, that's all they said.
.
So only people 65 or older can fall down and need this.... condiscending at best ... insulting
Coming next:
- Escape from home detection.
- Escape from taking the blue pill detection.
- Escape from updating iOS/WatchOS detection.
- Escape from the Watch detection.
- Escape from Google and Apple detection (in a joint effort between Google, Apple, and Governments across the World).
Even if you are fit and healthy you might still want to track your activity. Being able to visualise your achievements can provide a lot of encouragement to do more activity. Excersize is a lot about being motivated. Yes you can get a Fitbit but they are extremely limited I’d rather spend more and get a smart watch which allows me to do so much more. My husband had the same thoughts as you a few years ago and bought a Fitbit even though I told him to get a smartwatch. He said he didn’t need one. The following year he said he wished he’d got a smart watch and then bought one.I am going to go out here on a limb and state my obversations on this feature and AppleWatch Series 4. Generally most elderly people have poor eyesight/vision, not all however most. Even with the increased size of Series 4, an elderly persons hand and finger dexterity can be less than precise (not all however most). Given that WatchOS is simpler than most to navigate, it still has quite a bit to go to make it elderly friendly. Many elderly people do not understand new/er technology advances (there may be some exceptions to this). Fall detection is great for certain age groups (most can benefit), however given the above how quickly will an elderly person even dismiss false positives.
Granted that usually some tech enthusiast family member or an Apple Store employee will configure these devices, my understanding is that most elderly people end up confused or lost in mobile technology. I am having a hard time understanding who this feature and device is really for. People who are genuinely fit, don’t require a device to get them moving (which includes me), for those who need some digital encouragement great, however would that not be better suited for a larger device such as a phone or even something smaller like a FitBit at a fraction of the cost.
If you are an elderly person the technology has to seamlessly integrate into your lifestyle with zero or minimal learning curve, most will not even use half the power of what Series 4 will offer let along prior models. If it was a simple device with a single button that has this algorithm built into it that would be great. Press button for help, press twice to cancel, has a red light that falshes when activated for help and can detect Falls and provide a voice prompt.
It is not great to age, your vision, hearing, dexterity, balance, etc take a severe hit. Cognition may also be affected, though that is not always the case. Usually the elderly do not have time to invest in complex technology, most will try if their cannot figure it out, their tend to forget and not try again.
Though Apples marketing tells us that every elderly person is some Apple tech enthusiasts and raves about the AppleWatch, in reality most don’t receive enough of a pension or social security and struggle on a daily basis to obtain food, housing, clothing, medical, dental, etc. I am sure the AppleWatch is not on their priority of things in their remaining years.
I am curious to hear people’s thoughts on this.
[doublepost=1537754463][/doublepost]
I concur, the G-force and length of fall would not trigger Fall Detection if the algorithm is good. Besides you can always turn it off when boarding these rides if it is of a concern.
[doublepost=1537754543][/doublepost]
I believe ECG is also not available until later this year. All this fuss over a larger screen with more complications. I have had some hard falls in my time, never required the assistance of feature or emergency such as this. Even light to moderate activity will strengthen the body to recover quickly. Which I guess is good for any wearable device to encourage a healthier lifestyle, however if you were already healthy prior to Series 0 introduction or even the FitBit, it may just offer an expensive encouragement at most.
Yeah no one can reliably reproduce a fall. Oh except Apple "reports". And trust me, I can fall just like some person in assisted living. It's not some skill you learn with age lol
If it's not reliable then again, it's a gimmick.
Yes... And your gold standard for characterizing a fall, is falling on thick couch cushions laid out on the floor and "slapping your wrist hard."
Please, contact Apple and let their scientists/engineers/health professionals know they're going about this wrong and put them on the right track.
Exactly this.Cant recall ever seeing anyone over 65 with an Apple Watch...
Cant recall ever seeing anyone over 65 with an Apple Watch...
Does it though? It's a heavily advertised feature. Being disabled by default doesn't appear to be obvious or clear.
But most importantly, people of any age can fall and take advantage of this. If the algorithm is good enough and hard enough to fake, I don't see the disadvantage for always being on.