Not mine. Cigna.Actually there several insurers that do cover an Apple Watch through employer paid plans
Not mine. Cigna.Actually there several insurers that do cover an Apple Watch through employer paid plans
Type 1 is a term used widely. The vast majority of diabetics agree.None taken, but I do (although “vast majority” is an Internet forums term used when the poster wants to make a point but doesn’t know the stat). As I said, there are more diabetics who do not require CGM than those who do, and the AW may be a good solution for them. For people who make little to no insulin (i.e. Type 1, which is actually an older and a little misleading term, but that’s another topic) that vigilance is important and CGM is a valuable and sometimes critical tool.
Ooooooh… I hadn't even considered that. Good point!I hope it works for children and not just adults. It will be a game changer for not only kids with Type 1, but for better understanding ADD, ADHD, and Autism, and for helping kids (like my son) with sensory processing issues to understand when they are hungry and to do something about it.
Why?As someone who has used an insertable Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) for about 10 years, I promise you this will not be accurate enough to be medically useful. Some of the existing (FDA Approved) inserted CGMs are off so wildly that they need to be calibrated every 4 hours. Even with recalibration, they can be significantly off. This may be a fun toy, but will not work well enough to be relied upon. I would love it if it actually worked, but the thing is, the objection people have with CGMs is not that they need to be inserted. It's the accuracy. Anyone who depends on one would be happy to continue to insert one if it could be relied upon as an accurate tool. Making it non-inserted, but inaccurate, is no better, and in fact worse, than what currently exists. I guess we'll soon see, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Did a quick google search and TGA is changing their policies on february 25th 2021 to allow devices like an Apple Watch to get approved. I still don't see how Apple is to blame for ECG not being available in Australia yet.Yes they are to blame for Australia,..Apple need to apply to the TGA for approval in Australia & as of late last year, still had not.
The biggest mistake they made, was that they launched ECG as a "medical device" feature.
Jesus mate settle down!How?? It was never advertised in Australia as having ECG. You paid for an Apple watch, not for ECG. You should have returned it to Apple of you weren't happy with your purchase!
I see your point, but that's just the way it is right now, and you knew that going in.Jesus mate settle down!
Just stating ECG is a feature of my Apple Watch model. Therefore, a bit of the production cost of my Apple Watch, went towards the ECG hardware, which is disabled atm.
So I paid for something which I cannot use right now.
Indeed. That's why Apple should not over-complicate this feature. It should be simple - send me a notification when you detect that my blood sugar is very high and after several such notifications, advice me to see a doctor and make a formal testing. Including different graphics, variables and adding all sort of different variable just makes it too complicated for the general public. I want the Apple Watch to look out for me in the background and do its measurements without me having to make any input or interact with the device apart from wearing it. That is by the way the problem with the EKG. If you dont do it often, its is like to having it at all. It should be more seamless but I guess we are still not there with the technology and you need to hold the crown to get a reading.Hmm, from that example, it seems the purpose would be to prompt the doctor that a formal test might be warranted.
I agree with everyone that it likely won’t be as accurate as pricking your finger… BUT I’m not sure it has to be in order to be a game changer. The “game changing” aspect is that, unlike a finger prick test, this could monitor your blood glucose constantly throughout the entire day and night. It could take a measurement every 30 minutes or whatever.
Sure.And these trends of course also get captured in the health app making the data more accessible and integrated with all your other health data, etc.
Yeah I didn't quite understand that one either. LOLType 1 is a term used widely. The vast majority of diabetics agree.
Good lord, calm down.
hey man, if you lived with T1D and were into the tech, you would be just as skeptical. I love tech! If this is true it will literally change my life dramatically and I will explode with happiness. The skepticism for this particular tech is likely because we know how hard it is to do what this article is suggesting. Dexcom and Abbott have been at this forever.I love the people that crap on technology they haven’t even seen yet. You’d be the person saying “it’s ridiculous to think that thing can fly” when the first plane took off. Wait and see what they have before deciding it can’t possibly work. We are talking about a lot of very smart people and a lot of funding in R&D here.
I'm not saying that's not an admirable goal. I'm saying they're not going to be able to achieve that goal. I am confident they haven't, nor will they have, achieved that goal (of having a non-inserted, accurate CGM) by the time the next watch comes out.Why?
We were always going to get there one day? Why not now? There were companies dedicated to researching accurate non invasive methods of measuring blood glucose and didn’t Apple buy a couple of them?
Constant monitoring doesn't do you much good if it's inaccurate. It would just be getting more of something worthless.I agree with everyone that it likely won’t be as accurate as pricking your finger… BUT I’m not sure it has to be in order to be a game changer. The “game changing” aspect is constant monitoring built into your watch.
I understand your point, but this comment made me laugh, "Tech should be mature now." They've been telling us (t1d) that we would have an artificial pancreas any day now for over 30 years. This tech is much more complicated than people realize. What seems superficially simple is much more complex than anyone (including researchers) thinks. The Pancreas is an AMAZING machine. I wish I had a working one.The concept about using smartwatches to diagnose diabetes began more than a decade ago. Tech should be mature now. It's the right time for Apple to do it. Can't wait.
Actually… it does; or at least it can.Constant monitoring doesn't do you much good if it's inaccurate. It would just be getting more of something worthless.
CJ - not trying to be snarky in the least but why on earth do you still prick 10-12x a day if you have a G6? Again, YDMV, but man I have not pricked my finger at all since going on the G6.As a type one diabetic since 12 I still test 10-12 times a day even with a Dexcom G6 CGM and keep my A1C in the 5 range (non-diabetic). I’ve been waiting for a non-invasive CGM system since testing various ones in the 90’s. If this comes to market, it will be a game changer. I‘m old fashioned and still wear swiss timepieces but I’ll gladly wear an Apple Watch 7 with CGM on another wrist.
My father was a type 1 since 6 and never took care of himself. He was an investment banker who worked between London and NYC - he put his work and our ”lifestyle” above everything else. Towards the end he lost he legs from infection and was in a wheelchair for years then lost eyesight in his left eye and could barely use his hands. All the money in the world can’t save oneself from self destruction.CJ - not trying to be snarky in the least but why on earth do you still prick 10-12x a day if you have a G6? Again, YDMV, but man I have not pricked my finger at all since going on the G6.