It is a failure, still
I have a s2 ceramic amd love it. But only use it while swimming and sometimes für paying.
It’s a useless piece of art to me!
Love the solo loop
Guess in between it’s also being used as the timepiece, right?

It is a failure, still
I have a s2 ceramic amd love it. But only use it while swimming and sometimes für paying.
It’s a useless piece of art to me!
Love the solo loop
About 5 billion in watch sales with total Wearables/Acc/Home sales topping at 7.8 billion. That doesn't look outlandish with no new Home Pod or Apple TV in that quarter.This estimate is completely wrong. Wearables/Acc/Home grew only 20% for that QTR as reported by Apple. You cannot have Watch sales that high and back into the reported numbers
How do these people have jobs?
Larger screen.What would you like to see different?
Yes, should be a huge jump. Daughter has a S3 I have a S6, there was a good jump from 3 to 4, the jump from 3 to 6 is impressive.In terms of speed. If I upgrade from a S3 to S6, will the improvement be noticable? I am talking about loading apps and apps loading their content. Seems rediculously slow on the s3
They probably back into it with the wearables category total sales and just subtract revenue based on estimates for Airpods. It’s probably not a terrible guess, but it’s still just a guess.Wet finger in the air?
you ain't kidding - one of the guys that used to work there say most of the numbers are made upI’m sure the numbers are good, but IDC just guesses.
Yes, you will experience a noticeable difference in speed and performance.In terms of speed. If I upgrade from a S3 to S6, will the improvement be noticable? I am talking about loading apps and apps loading their content. Seems rediculously slow on the s3
Just moved from an S3 to an SE (which is equivalent to the 5 more or less). Definitely faster in every regard and noticeable.In terms of speed. If I upgrade from a S3 to S6, will the improvement be noticable? I am talking about loading apps and apps loading their content. Seems rediculously slow on the s3
I see what you did there. 😂I am happily using my S4 SS, while the wife is using SS S6 and my older daughter is still using my old SS S2. We are very happy with Apple Watch and suckers for stainless steel - once you go stainless steel, you cant go backWe tend to skip few generations to offset the costs of SS - works just fine for us.
Mine isn't. I only wear it when working out (which is still a solid one hour a day), otherwise it's permanently in nightstamd mode.Guess in between it’s also being used as the timepiece, right?
Mine isn't. I only wear it when working out (which is still a solid one hour a day), otherwise it's permanently in nightstamd mode.
Xiaomi's Mi Band does that and lasts about 15 daysI have Series 2 and personally I really cant see any functionality or improvment that justifies paying 399$ for a brand new Series 6. Yeah, bigger screen, faster CPU, two additional health sensors but the bottom line is that I want a full week of battery life under very casual use, just checking notifications and recording health data day and night.
Pretty much yes. I run (indoor and outdoor) and do yoga, the Apple Watch does a good job tracking both. Combined with the Fitness app or one like Habitify it's easy to track how I'm doing, without any extra effort.Wow, so you really just bought it as a fitness tracker?
I would like to see Apple creating a real ''pro'' version of the watch that offer same functionnality AND accuracy as garmin/polar/suunto.
-Accurate GPS
-Support for accessories
-All the running features from Garmin (pacing, recovery, ...)
-Maybe innovate by adding glucose/sweet monitoring.
I would happily ditch my Garmin (which is the best watch i've ever own) since it's a perfect runner watch but really lack when it come to smartphone integration.
The Apple watch isn't meant to be used to diagnose any condition and they state that. The o2 level was just implemented and will need to be improved to actually be accurate (possibly constructing straps with a reflective surface on the band opposite of the sensor so the beams can be reflected back to the watch. I read that the reason the watch isn't as accurate is because finger tip sensors clip around the finger so the beam can go through the finger and reflects back to the sensor which gives a much more accurate reading. Using the wrist is problematic considering how thick it is and nothing to reflect the beams back to the watch.. I personally have never had a reading below 98% which is consistent with my finger tip dedicated o2 sensor but, I've also had times when it couldn't get a reading.. I've noticed all the sensors work best if the band isn't too looseSo far nobody's mentioned the seemingly low blood oxygen level reading one what looks like the arm of a young person...