Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Other than 5G, the main change is the LTPO3 display that allows for seconds hand on watch faces. I like that feature on my Series 10. Other than that I am not sure whether it is worth upgrading from Ultra 2.
 
getting the Ultra3 - yes, not a lot of new stuff with regards to the Ultra2, but after 2 years I'd like a fresh battery
 
getting the Ultra3 - yes, not a lot of new stuff with regards to the Ultra2, but after 2 years I'd like a fresh battery
£95 here in the UK for a new battery to be installed. Costco selling Ultra 3 for £724.99. Music magpie offering £220 for my old watch.
The only issue would be if you’ve not reached the minimum percentage on your battery that they’ll replace it, which is 80% or lower.
I think for me the £95 is the better option.
 
Last edited:
£95 here in the UK for a new battery to be installed. Costco selling Ultra 3 for £724.99. Music magpie offering £220 for my old watch.
The only issue would be if you’ve not reached the minimum percentage on your battery that they’ll replace it, which I think is 82% or lower.
I think for me the £95 is the better option.
totally fine - for me the upgrade is worth it - all things considered
 
  • Like
Reactions: Davelfc
my ultra 1 is working fine, im afraid they are fixin to depricate it now that 3 is out
 
There are worthwhile updates from my perspective but no “need to haves” and so I’ll keep my OG Ultra for another year or two. Probably buy a titanium band this year.
 
Watch is just something I can't upgrade yearly. I always been waiting for new health features. U2 to U3 has none. U2 will stay on wrist till it dies or apple gives us something that really could be life changing.
 
I run long distance and this summer every time I run a 10k it register a KM like about many meters afterwards.
From 40 meters to like up to a whopping 200M which ****s up my pace I believe when running.
I know it does since it happens on the track when I clearly did a full lap and it registers it later like what the ****.

I really hope this doesn't happen with my Ultra 3 or Timmy is a bum!
You’re probably better off getting a Garmin if you are a serious runner needing reliable gps and metrics + as a bonus you multiply your battery life
 
Watch is just something I can't upgrade yearly. I always been waiting for new health features. U2 to U3 has none. U2 will stay on wrist till it dies or apple gives us something that really could be life changing.
Well, it will be 2 years before we get U4.

I agree. There is no motivation to upgrade from U1 to U3 or U2 to U3 (Especially with the lower than expected trade in value).
 
I loved my Ultra 2 so much that I thought I’d absolutely skip the next version, but I placed an order for an Ultra 3 this evening. With my qualified discount of $719 plus my trade-in value of $335, it brings my cost to $384.

Considering that I also get a new Trail Loop out of this and an extra charging cable, that gives me even more value. I got two full years of 24/7 use out of my AWU2 (except for charging while showering) and while the battery in my AWU2 is still doing great at 96%…it is probably safe to assume that if I kept it another 2 years, then a $99 battery replacement would come due at some point in time, especially since I wear my watch around the clock.

I routinely run with just my watch and no phone, and I am routinely out of all cell phone range at least 8 days a month, so the satellite connectivity will be very handy for me. Excited about the upgrade!
If you don't mind me asking, what is your qualified discount, I am in similar boat as you.
 
I may just upgrade my s7 to a used u2. No need for u3 specific ones. Easy cash saved.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SFjohn
I am also thinking of upgrade from Ultra 1 to 3 because they will give me 280 Euro. I can not sell it on the market for this price. And like say from other people , I think next updates on the software will not include the ULTRA 1. Next reason is , there is a nice video on youtube of all watch battery life and the Ultra 1 is much much behinde Ultra 2 , so than it means for me the Ultra 3 is much better. I don't need 5G or satelite I like all the other function (just for fun)
 


The Apple Watch Ultra 3 replaces the second-generation model that was introduced two years ago in Apple's smartwatch lineup, but how different are the two successive smartwatch generations?

Apple-Watch-Ultra-2-vs.-Ultra-3-Feature.jpg

The two Apple Watch Ultra models share the overwhelming majority of their features, so should you consider buying or sticking with the second generation to save money? This breakdown serves as a way to see all the differences that the Ultra 3 brings to the table.

The Apple Watch Series 11 represents one of the smallest upgrades to the mainstream model ever, while the Apple Watch Ultra 3 provides a bit bigger but still modest change compared to its predecessor.

Apple Watch Ultra 2Apple Watch Ultra 3
OLED displayWide-angle OLED display
LTPO2 displayLTPO3 display
410 by 502 pixel display422 by 514 pixel display
1185 sq mm display area1245 sq mm display area (5% larger)
S9 chipS10 chip
LTE and UMTS connectivityLTE and 5G connectivity
Satellite connectivity
Emergency SOS via satellite
2.178 watt-hour battery2.313 watt-hour battery (6% larger)
Fast-charge 0–80% in about 1 hourFast-charge 0–80% in about 45 minutes


Overall, the Apple Watch Ultra 3 is a fairly minor upgrade over the second-generation model, with the most substantial changes focusing on the display. The new Apple Watch Ultra's display is a little larger, and it now features wide-angle OLED and LTPO3 for better viewing angles and a higher refresh rate when lowered, meaning there is a persistent ticking seconds hand on some watch faces.

It features 5G connectivity for the first time alongside Emergency SOS via satellite, bringing two iPhone features to the Apple Watch. Battery life is slightly better and the device charges to 80% 15 minutes faster, but there are few upgrades of substance.

It will likely not be worth upgrading from an Apple Watch Ultra 2 to an Ultra 3, even though they come two years apart. The Apple Watch Ultra 2 gains all of the same health features as the Ultra 3, and even its S9 chip has the same CPU as the S10; the S10 is simply a more compact version of the S9, so don't expect a performance boost. Owners of the first-generation Apple Watch Ultra from three years ago may have more reason to get the latest device, but it is far from an essential upgrade.

Article Link: Apple Watch Ultra 2 vs. Ultra 3 Buyer's Guide: 10 Upgrades Compared
What we needed from the Apple Watch Ultra 3 was all of the features that it received, and then a lot more. New health sensors, and a front facing camera on the side of the watch for pictures and video and a camera on the watch face for selfies, pictures, videos and both FaceTime and messenger video calls. This would be a complete game changer for the Apple Watch and make it totally worthwhile. Hopefully someone at Apple is listening!!!
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.